Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-11 Thread Ethan J Mings
Hello Robert, Thursday, June 11, 2009, 12:43:35 PM, you wrote: > No Marek, it is not. I know it is very convenient for you in your > hopeless defense of the "we-are-not-going-to-make-any-commitments" > strategy but it is not enough for us. > So, either they deliver IMAP support or the discus

Re: Mod: DEAD HORSE (was: Again IMAP Support)

2009-06-11 Thread Gleason Pace
Robert, > As for kicking me/ others -- your choice, of course, this is your > list. In any case, it is interesting that you decided to only kick > Arjan. I wonder how many of us have been doing this sort of thing in one way or another since the days of Fido? Since time immemorial we have kn

Re: Again IMAP Support

2009-06-11 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 23:55:39, Marek Mikus wrote: > seems "You" care about IMAP only, but for example our customers requested > version without problem with DEP detection under Windows 2008 Server, What's the point of DEP detection at all? And if TB works fine with DEP, why doesn't it set it

Customers and No-Customers - Feature Requests

2009-06-11 Thread Jens Franik
Hello The Bat! Beta Tester, === I am very sorry, i first replied to the DEAD HORSE Thread, i did not recognize this in time - hope i will not be kicked out :-( ==

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-11 Thread Jens Franik
Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2009 at 18:40, Robert Tomanek wrote: >> version without problem with DEP detection under Windows 2008 Server, > Can you honestly say how many of your (pl.) customers have > requested this particular feature I have been silent, willing not to push this up... But i would ha

Re: delayed sending

2009-06-11 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 11:34:47 AM, Dwight Corrin wrote: > There is a second message, which was composed at the same time, and > set to be sent in 24 hours, by the custom setting. This message is > still sitting in the outbox, (it is currently about 11:35 am > Thursday). i

Re: delayed sending

2009-06-11 Thread Rick
> First of all, my sent mail is wierd, because it always shows the > received time an hour later than the created date, including when it's > not during daylight savings time. > Yesterday at 9:14 am, I sent myself a message, to be dispatched at 8 > am tomorrow (today). The message was sent

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-11 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:53:20 -0400, Vili wrote: >I dont know if you have to say anything. They know I think that the >help is old. Rewriting the help file is a time consuming and boring job. I think at Ritlabs there is a tendency to try to avoid and/or postpone boring and/or difficult jobs. That'

Re: Mod: DEAD HORSE (was: Again IMAP Support)

2009-06-11 Thread Robert Tomanek
Hello Marck, Thursday, June 11, 2009, 6:51:55 PM, you wrote: RT>> I never quote full posts just to add "Agree!" at the end but this is RT>> the first time I genuinely feel the urge to do so. > Well, you shouldn't. Especially not on a "Dead Horse" thread. Sheesh I apologize for responding to a

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-11 Thread Robert Tomanek
Hello Arjan, Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 12:19:48 AM, you wrote: >>Certainly those hopefuls are having too much fun to >>allow themselves to be run off. > In a way it is funny indeed, because everything is so > predictable. > Release 4.1 was an unpleasant surprise for many users, > because they

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-11 Thread Robert Tomanek
Hello Marek, Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 12:44:30 AM, you wrote: > I hope, this is enough now to stop imap-related discussion until anything > related to IMAP will be announced. No Marek, it is not. I know it is very convenient for you in your hopeless defense of the "we-are-not-going-to-make-any-co

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-11 Thread Robert Tomanek
Hello Marek, Monday, June 8, 2009, 11:55:39 PM, you wrote: > seems "You" care about IMAP only, but for example our customers requested ... > version without problem with DEP detection under Windows 2008 Server, ROTFL. Can you honestly say how many of your (pl.) customers have requested this

delayed sending

2009-06-11 Thread Dwight Corrin
First of all, my sent mail is wierd, because it always shows the received time an hour later than the created date, including when it's not during daylight savings time. Yesterday at 9:14 am, I sent myself a message, to be dispatched at 8 am tomorrow (today). The message was sent today, a

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-11 Thread Vili
>> I think I spotted a bug in TB! 4.2.4. When I tried to get Help on >> changing View Modes (Options -> Preferences -> Message List -> View >> Modes -> Edit) and clicked the "Help" button, I got >> this: "Missing context help topic 11026". > Confirmed.  I got the same error when I followed the ste

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-11 Thread Ethan J Mings
Hello Arjan, Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 9:33:46 PM, you wrote: > I think I spotted a bug in TB! 4.2.4. When I tried to get Help on > changing View Modes (Options -> Preferences -> Message List -> View > Modes -> Edit) and clicked the "Help" button, I got > this: "Missing context help topic 11026"

Re: OpenPGP Validation

2009-06-11 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi, HMdB> Can't confirm. I do not experience any problems using GPG 1.4.10 svn HMdB> 5042. If I may cut in for a moment - where do you get your public keys for signature checking? Do you only check known contacts or do you access a key server? Could you recomend some servers that are worth try