Am 18.09.2010 03:25, schrieb Gleason:
Better to not have a published timeline. That way your critics can't
fault you when you don't meet it.
And you can't be rushed into release before you are prepared to meet the
harsh criticisms of those same critics.
Well, i have been bread to set myself
Hello Jens,
Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote:
Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline?
What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when
it will be ready.
--
Best regards,
Maxim
On Saturday, September 18, 2010, 7:18:58 AM, Peter Hampf wrote:
The Bat!
v4.2.36.4 Professional Edition 21-Apr-2010 16 MB is offered for download.
?-}
Couldn't tell you how long I've been running .4
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo
Jens Franik wrote:
Am 18.09.2010 03:25, schrieb Gleason:
Better to not have a published timeline. That way your critics can't
fault you when you don't meet it.
And you can't be rushed into release before you are prepared to meet the
harsh criticisms of those same critics.
Well, i have
Maxim,
Hello Jens,
Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote:
Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline?
What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when
it will be ready
The problems of two people communicating through English when
On Saturday, September 18, 2010, 10:03:01 AM, Peter Hampf wrote:
It's the fact that my TB is detecting a version from April in September that
amazes me.
computers are funny. you'd think they would be more predictable, but
we all know they aren't.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385
Hello Jens,
Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote:
Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline?
What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when
it will be ready.
How long do you think that it might be in Alpha testing. If I
Rick wrote:
Hello Jens,
Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote:
Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline?
What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when
it will be ready.
How long do you think that it might be in Alpha
9/18/2010 1:37 PM
Hi Peter,
On 9/18/2010 Peter Hampf wrote:
PH Answering a current message (Saturday, September 18, 2010, 15:42)
PH Hello Dwight,
DC Couldn't tell you how long I've been running .4
PH I am intentionally not running it due to the initial problems with that
version.
PH It's
Am 18.09.2010 14:14, schrieb Maxim Masiutin:
Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline?
What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when
it will be ready.
Well, that is not the answer, that i expected, but it is faithfully of
course :-)
--
Am 18.09.2010 21:07, schrieb Jens Franik:
We will release the version when it will be ready.
Well, that is not the answer, that i expected, but it is faithfully of
course :-)
And of course, i forgot to say: The translation will be made, if it is
ready - do you agree?
--
Jens
Am 18.09.2010 18:42, schrieb Gleason:
How long do you think that it might be in Alpha testing. If I remember
correctly at one point you though it would be in alpha for about 2 months -
that was about a month ago.
See what I mean?
Yes, but my intention has been to push up some facts about
12 matches
Mail list logo