Re: Maxim - bugs fixed

2010-09-18 Thread Jens Franik
Am 18.09.2010 03:25, schrieb Gleason: Better to not have a published timeline. That way your critics can't fault you when you don't meet it. And you can't be rushed into release before you are prepared to meet the harsh criticisms of those same critics. Well, i have been bread to set myself

Re: Maxim - bugs fixed

2010-09-18 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Jens, Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote: Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline? What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when it will be ready. -- Best regards, Maxim

Re: 4.2.36.4

2010-09-18 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Saturday, September 18, 2010, 7:18:58 AM, Peter Hampf wrote: The Bat! v4.2.36.4 Professional Edition 21-Apr-2010 16 MB is offered for download. ?-} Couldn't tell you how long I've been running .4 -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo

Re: Maxim - bugs fixed

2010-09-18 Thread Gleason
Jens Franik wrote: Am 18.09.2010 03:25, schrieb Gleason: Better to not have a published timeline. That way your critics can't fault you when you don't meet it. And you can't be rushed into release before you are prepared to meet the harsh criticisms of those same critics. Well, i have

Re: Maxim - bugs fixed

2010-09-18 Thread Gleason
Maxim, Hello Jens, Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote: Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline? What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when it will be ready The problems of two people communicating through English when

Re: 4.2.36.4

2010-09-18 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Saturday, September 18, 2010, 10:03:01 AM, Peter Hampf wrote: It's the fact that my TB is detecting a version from April in September that amazes me. computers are funny. you'd think they would be more predictable, but we all know they aren't. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385

Re: Maxim - bugs fixed

2010-09-18 Thread Rick
Hello Jens, Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote: Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline? What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when it will be ready. How long do you think that it might be in Alpha testing. If I

Re: Maxim - bugs fixed

2010-09-18 Thread Gleason
Rick wrote: Hello Jens, Friday, September 17, 2010, 11:15:15 PM, you wrote: Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline? What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when it will be ready. How long do you think that it might be in Alpha

Re[2]: 4.2.36.4

2010-09-18 Thread Paul Van Noord
9/18/2010 1:37 PM Hi Peter, On 9/18/2010 Peter Hampf wrote: PH Answering a current message (Saturday, September 18, 2010, 15:42) PH Hello Dwight, DC Couldn't tell you how long I've been running .4 PH I am intentionally not running it due to the initial problems with that version. PH It's

Re: Maxim - bugs fixed

2010-09-18 Thread Jens Franik
Am 18.09.2010 14:14, schrieb Maxim Masiutin: Thank you, but did you read over my question about a rude timeline? What do you mean by a rude timeline? We will release the version when it will be ready. Well, that is not the answer, that i expected, but it is faithfully of course :-) --

Re: Maxim - bugs fixed

2010-09-18 Thread Jens Franik
Am 18.09.2010 21:07, schrieb Jens Franik: We will release the version when it will be ready. Well, that is not the answer, that i expected, but it is faithfully of course :-) And of course, i forgot to say: The translation will be made, if it is ready - do you agree? -- Jens

Re: Maxim - bugs fixed

2010-09-18 Thread Jens Franik
Am 18.09.2010 18:42, schrieb Gleason: How long do you think that it might be in Alpha testing. If I remember correctly at one point you though it would be in alpha for about 2 months - that was about a month ago. See what I mean? Yes, but my intention has been to push up some facts about