>> The sent from Outlook at 22:43.
> TB is definitely using the wrong offset. It's not my PC as Outlook is
> correct. I have rebooted and restarted TB.
> I have tried Optoions/Perferences/Message List/Date_Time Format to use
> Windows regional Settings
> Now the spellin checker has gone AWOL.
> The sent from Outlook at 22:43.
TB is definitely using the wrong offset. It's not my PC as Outlook is
correct. I have rebooted and restarted TB.
I have tried Optoions/Perferences/Message List/Date_Time Format to use
Windows regional Settings
Now the spellin checker has gone AWOL.
I am close
> I don't know why TB has the offset as -0100. I assume TB gets the
> timezone info from Windows. There was a lot of discussion a while back
> about timezone offsets and now I wonder if something got broken back
> then.
>
> This message sent at 22:00:11 BST
This reply sent from Outlook 22:5
> I don't know why TB has the offset as -0100. I assume TB gets the
> timezone info from Windows. There was a lot of discussion a while back
> about timezone offsets and now I wonder if something got broken back
> then.
>
> This message sent at 22:00:11 BST
The sent from Outlook at 22:43.
> I don't know why TB has the offset as -0100. I assume TB gets the
> timezone info from Windows. There was a lot of discussion a while back
> about timezone offsets and now I wonder if something got broken back
> then.
>
> This message sent at 22:00:11 BST
Apologies for the lack of quoting.
Hello Tony,
Tuesday, March 27, 2012, 12:10:59 AM, you wrote:
> I don't know why TB has the offset as -0100. I assume TB gets the
> timezone info from Windows. There was a lot of discussion a while back
> about timezone offsets and now I wonder if something got broken back
> then.
>
Hello Dwight,
Monday, March 26, 2012, 7:03:14 PM, you wrote:
> On Monday, March 26, 2012, 11:36:49 AM, Tony Hoare wrote:
>
>> I don't think TB has a clue about the time now. See the attached image
>
> why would it know anything about the time, beyond what it can learn
> from the syste
Hallo Thomas,
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:52:29 +0700GMT (26-3-2012, 16:52 , where I
live), you wrote:
yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any
body or attachment, they were decoded from TS-TNEF.
MM>> but I was wrong, it was implemented in 4.0 already :-)
T
Hallo Tony,
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:36:49 -0100GMT (26-3-2012, 18:36 , where I
live), you wrote:
TH We have just gone over to BST and now my new emails are showing that
TH they are created/received two hours into the future. It seems that the
TH offset has been added the wrong way.
TH
On Monday, March 26, 2012, 11:36:49 AM, Tony Hoare wrote:
> I don't think TB has a clue about the time now. See the attached image
why would it know anything about the time, beyond what it can learn
from the system clock?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin
TH>>> We have just gone over to BST and now my new emails are showing that
TH>>> they are created/received two hours into the future. It seems that the
TH>>> offset has been added the wrong way.
I don't think TB has a clue about the time now. See the attached image
--
Best regards,
Tony
Hello Marek,
Monday, March 19, 2012, 11:41:44 PM, you wrote:
MM> Hello all,
MM> Monday, March 19, 2012, Dierk Haasis wrote:
>>> yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any
>>> body or attachment, they were decoded from TS-TNEF.
>> In that case I sit enlightened.
Hello Marek,
Monday, March 19, 2012, 10:38:02 PM, you wrote:
MM> yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any
MM> body or attachment, they were decoded from TS-TNEF.
Guessing that you mean v5 of TheBat!, this is extremely good news!
Once they can guarantee that th
Hello Roelof,
Monday, March 26, 2012, 10:33:03 AM, you wrote:
> Hallo Tony,
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:41:47 -0100GMT (26-3-2012, 12:41 , where I
> live), you wrote:
TH>> We have just gone over to BST and now my new emails are showing that
TH>> they are created/received two hours into the fu
Hallo Tony,
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:41:47 -0100GMT (26-3-2012, 12:41 , where I
live), you wrote:
TH> We have just gone over to BST and now my new emails are showing that
TH> they are created/received two hours into the future. It seems that the
TH> offset has been added the wrong way.
My previous
Hallo Tony,
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:41:47 -0100GMT (26-3-2012, 12:41 , where I
live), you wrote:
TH> We have just gone over to BST and now my new emails are showing that
TH> they are created/received two hours into the future. It seems that the
TH> offset has been added the wrong way.
You do appe
Hello Tbbeta,
We have just gone over to BST and now my new emails are showing that
they are created/received two hours into the future. It seems that the
offset has been added the wrong way.
Confirmations?
--
Best regards,
Tony mailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk
The B
17 matches
Mail list logo