AV at address 00404BEE
Hello, I have got this error on background. --- The Bat! --- Access violation at address 00404BEE in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 1980FE88. --- OK --- exceptions log: Date: 02 May 2012 10:33:03 OS: Windows 7 Service Pack 1 build 7601 PhysMemFreeTotal: 725/2047 MB VirtMemFreeTotal: 1589/2047 MB Address: 00404BEE ClassName: EAccessViolation Message: Access violation at address 00404BEE in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 28961E2A IsOSException: 1 Modules: 0040 20120423114424 K:\The Bat!\thebat.exe Stack: 00404BEE [0040] 0040548E [0040] 007F00A7 [0040] 0040648D [0040] 00405362 [0040] 00404FC1 [0040] 00410DA7 [0040] 00403044 [0040] 00405B84 [0040] 00411311 [0040] 00404D82 [0040] 004113BC [0040] 00405362 [0040] 004063A3 [0040] 00B086BC [0040] 00405416 [0040] 0040548E [0040] 007F00A7 [0040] 00405362 [0040] 00404FC1 [0040] 00410DA7 [0040] 00403044 [0040] 00405B84 [0040] 00411311 [0040] 00404D82 [0040] 004113BC [0040] 00405362 [0040] 00406386 [0040] 00BB494D [0040] 00B08604 [0040] 00AF34BB [0040] 00AF3668 [0040] 006E8CD6 [0040] 00405F8F [0040] 006EC2CE [0040] 006EBC91 [0040] 006EB25E [0040] 00AF36F2 [0040] 00AF31E0 [0040] 006EB0D3 [0040] 00B03E4A [0040] 00AFF778 [0040] 00467D72 [0040] 00405ADC [0040] -- Thanks and Bye, Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 5.1.2 under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.3.1.1 Notebook Thinkpad, Core2 Duo 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM Current beta is 5.1.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filters working in v5? (Securing your hardware) :)
Hello RS, Rest of the info was correct. It's about 2am here now and it's probably a high time for me to get to bed. Luckily, most of us don't live in China and have to worry about security to that extent. Do you have TrueCrypt set up for hidden volumes and plausible deniability? If you use a VPN to a trusted server in EU/US, aren't you better off leaving you email on the trusted IMAP server so if you do loose your laptop again, your email is easily recoverable? I do appreciate that some unlucky people have a real need to protect themselves from serious danger and to leave as little trace as possible. My TB installation on my laptop is password protected and 'On the Fly' encrypted. Any idea how secure that is? -- Best regards, Tonymailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk The Bat! 5.0.36.2 Current beta is 5.1.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
flags on IMAP
Hello Tbbeta, Using 5.1.2.2, flagging messages in IMAP (Gmail) accounts doesn't stick. I use a several virtual folders, but flagging mails in the VFs or in the actual folders doesn't consistently survive a restart of the program. I also mark messages, but if I go back to those folders within an hour, without a restart of TB, the flags are gone. Sometimes the flags disappear within 5 minutes. POP3 folders flagging seems OK. Best regards, Stuart Stuart Pye USA Mobile: +1-804-399-8303 Skype: stuartpye mailto:stu...@slicenet.net or mailto:stu...@nowire.us Current beta is 5.1.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filters working in v5? (Securing your hardware) :)
Hi Tony, TO Luckily, most of us don't live in China and have to worry about TO security to that extent. Do you have TrueCrypt set up for hidden TO volumes and plausible deniability? Only a small one for most important files (ex: passwords and user names file) but I made it rather as a test. There was a case of Brasilian banker that encrypted his HDD with TC (AES only) ; when police confiscated HDD they tried to decrypt it (with FBI help) for 18 month and failed. On my HDD (apart of OS) you have triple encryption on any container/partition with a keyfile so it's rather unbreakable within reasonable time. TC for me is rather to protect me when laptop is lost than to try to hide data from police (no matter if I think they have right to spy on us all the time ; ex: Google Drive, Dropbox, TuneIn, VoIP connection software on my Android phone and many more are already blocked in China because police can't control moved data). It's one of the reasons why apart of protecting my data against ordinary theft I do try to protect my privacy :) IMO hidden volume can be detected in the container even if you cooperate with police - there will be a size difference of data copied to a container and container size (unless I'm mistaken here). IMO, much better to claim plausible deniability is encrypting a raw clusters on the HDD (ex: external). In that way data on such HDD looks like a rubbish without any structure nor readable header to see what's there unless you know the password or a keyfile. Each time you connect such HDD to your system Windows is reporting unformatted drive and asks to format it. As for AES hardware encrypted USB it's possible that you might not know the password if ie. your kid for instance changed it long time ago :) Life is life ;P TO If you use a VPN to a trusted server in EU/US, aren't you better TO off leaving you email on the trusted IMAP server so if you do TO loose your laptop again, your email is easily recoverable? First is the size (over 6GB database), second is that I can do the same with TBK archive copied in TC container and burnt on DL DVD. Actually I have all e-mails doubled because every e-mail I sent and receive is saved on HDD as EML and I do make copies of it. I do burn on DVD TC containers so even if somebody gets it they can't read it. Last thing is that I do not have much trust in IMAP and leaving your data on some server ; even big companies lost customers data due to mistakes - you can call me old fashioned here but if it's lost I can only blame myself :) I do appreciate that some unlucky people have a real need to protect themselves from serious danger and to leave as little trace as possible. My TB installation on my laptop is password protected and 'On the Fly' encrypted. Any idea how secure that is? Sorry, I don't know. I would love to know what encryption is used by Ritlab. As for now I use non-encrypted TB! installed on separated TC container and it works good for me. I used on-fly-encrypted version first I installed TB! but had to switch to none-encrypted due to some problems I had with it (don't remember now what it was ; reported it on BugTraq but it's gone now). Tried to use Voyager that is on-fly-encrypted on my 32GB USB but it didn't work good. I mean here that Voyager worked good but sync to a my desktop failed 3 times in a raw so I just gave it up. At the moment I just use TBK to move it between laptop-desktop if I need to travel. -- Best Regards, RS (FEDARA) The Bat! 5.1.2 Windows 7 x64 Professional (7601 Service Pack 1) POP3 accounts (x5) Wednesday, May 2, 2012 (19:08 ; GMT+8) Current beta is 5.1.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Filters working in v5? (Securing your hardware) :)
5/2/2012 3:53 PM Hi RS, On 5/2/2012 RS (FEDARA) wrote: RF Last thing is that I do not have much trust in IMAP and leaving your RF data on some server ; even big companies lost customers data due to RF mistakes - you can call me old fashioned here but if it's lost I can RF only blame myself :) Agreed! RF As for now I use non-encrypted TB! installed on separated RF TC container and it works good for me. Me too! RF I used on-fly-encrypted version first I installed TB! but had to RF switch to none-encrypted due to some problems I had with it (don't RF remember now what it was ; reported it on BugTraq but it's gone now). For me it was unrecoverable corrupted mailbase files. RF Tried to use Voyager that is on-fly-encrypted on my 32GB USB but it RF didn't work good. I mean here that Voyager worked good but sync to a RF my desktop failed 3 times in a raw so I just gave it up. Same here. Thanks for the thorough explanation. It is comforting to know there is someone with similar experiences and similar solutions. - -- Paul The Bat! v.4.2.44.2 on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7601 No IMAP No OTFE Current beta is 5.1.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filters working in v5?
Hello Rick, Monday, April 30, 2012, 7:50:41 AM, you wrote: (Delayed sending already exists in v4). R Yes but it was finally FIXED by v5. No problem, I am not using this feature. R As for lesser bugs, ONE irritant is that when exiting templates (I R use a couple of folder templates) AUTOWRAP, AUTO FORMAT and JUSTIFY R ON AUTOWRAP are always on. If you deselect them, it doesn't R remember the setting Needs fixing. R The HTML editor could use some work and the way it handles R externally linked graphics needs to be totally rethought I hear that the HTML editor has improved from v4 to v5. I need it sometimes for business mails (to embed pictures or tables). -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 5.1.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [5.1.0.4] Still has timezone offset problem
Hello Tony, Monday, April 30, 2012, 5:36:01 PM, you wrote: If Tony is the only one having this problem, I might give it a try. TH Go on. I'm desperate for someone else to confirm the problem. You can TH always downgrade to 5.0.36.2 if you do have the problem. I'll check this first and will let you know. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 5.1.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Filters working in v5?
Hello Paul, Tuesday, May 1, 2012, 10:57:05 PM, you wrote: The message base is not local. R Is that not the nature of the beast? If you want security, us POP PVN Yup! Just picking this post to throw in another argument for POP you guys may not be aware of: Slow internet connection. I just came back from a province in Northern Thailand where my only access to the internet was GPRS (not even EDGE). So, I set TB! to download messages, and went to have breakfast. After that, all messages where on the computer, I could read and reply. With IMAP, only the headers would be downloaded. For each message and especially their attachments, I would have to download while waiting in front of the computer. Argument in favour of IMAP: I use IMAP on my iPhone. So I download only the headers when I'm travelling, reducing international roaming charges. If there is a message I need to read, I open that one only. However, this is not useful at my PCs, as I need to download all messages an attachments anyway. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.44 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 5.1.2.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
