Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello RS,
 
DC unless  there  is  some  reason  why  marking  it  read right away
DC interferes with what one wants to do with the message

 In  example you read or just scan a message but you don't have time to
 deal  with  it at the moment . In that way it stays in example in your
 main (cumulative) folder and waits for it's turn.

 Solution  would be creating additional VF and tag messages somehow but
 for instance in my TB! all VF values are reset to zero and in that way
 if  I  use  that  solution  I  will not know that there is any message
 pending to be handled...

I think it is a bit pointless to continue with this discussion, no one
is going to convince the other if there is a bug or not. Anyway, I will
tell you how I do things myself which, of course, to me, it seems a bit
more logic.

I hardly use any Incoming filters, just a few to sort messages for lists 
like this one and a couple of news letters. I mainly rely on Read and 
Reply filters.

This way, most of my incoming email just stays in the Inbox, where I 
will go to see if I have any new and 'unread' messages. I normally use 
Smart Space to browse/read a message and when I get to the end the 
message is marked as read and I'm automatically taken to the next. 
That's what Smart Space does.

Now, when I have one message selected in the Inbox Message List and 
displayed in the Preview pane, I may do several things with it if I just 
don't delete it:

1.- Just finish reading it and file it in appropriate folder

When message is marked as read by Smart Space, Read filters trigger and
one of them (most based on sender being in an AB Group) will move the
message to appropriate folder.

2.- Reply to it and then file it

As soon as I 'Send now' or 'Put in the outbox' the reply, Replied 
filters are triggered and one of them, with similar logic as Read ones 
(i.e. AB Groups) will move both the message being replied and the reply 
to appropriate folder.

3.- Keep it for later reply or further action

Before Smart Space marks it as read I flag it. Then, when marked as
read, a Read filter will move the message to my 'Action - Reply' folder,
which is the folder I will look at for pending actions/replies. When I
do reply/act on any of them, again Read and Replied filters will file
them appropriately.

Under 'Action - Reply' I have a VF which looks into it and with Advanced 
filter settings:
   Age is greater than 10 days
   AND Massage (attributes) is not replied 

And that is all. Have a good day.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:07 AM, MAU miguel.ur...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think it is a bit pointless to continue with this discussion, no one
 is going to convince the other if there is a bug or not. Anyway, I will
 tell you how I do things myself which, of course, to me, it seems a bit
 more logic.

Well, there is one thing I find pretty convincing: The old VF
behaviour (not removing the currently selected message) would not
destroy your process, while the current behaviour destroys ours.

So what's the argument against keeping the currently selected message
in the VF list until the user selects another? I haven't seen one. So
why don't we agree on that this should be fixed?


BRgds,
Carsten


 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello Carsten,
 
 So what's the argument against keeping the currently selected message
 in the VF list until the user selects another? I haven't seen one. So
 why don't we agree on that this should be fixed?

Forget it. Do you understand what 'pointless' means?

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread Rick
 Hello Carsten,
  
 So what's the argument against keeping the currently selected message
 in the VF list until the user selects another? I haven't seen one. So
 why don't we agree on that this should be fixed?

 Forget it. Do you understand what 'pointless' means?

Sorry to interject, but it seems to be working as DESIGNED. If you don't want 
read messages to show, then they DON'T. There WERE some refresh issues with VFs 
which I believe were fixed.

VFs don't show deleted emails. Perhaps that should be a feature request?

-- 
Rick
People are like stained glass windows:  They sparkle and shine when the sun is 
out,
But when the darkness sets in, their true beauty is revealed only if there is a 
light shining from within.

v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3
Using all POP accounts
I download all images

 



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Questions about Message Tags management

2012-05-22 Thread mse
Hello all,

I would like to raise two issues:

1) Do I understand it correctly, that at the moment it is not possible to 
delete Message Tags? You can create them and add them to a message, but you 
cannot delete them from the tag library.

2) Is it work by design, that it is not possible to change the name of a 
message tag?

Best regards,
mse
-- 
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 Pro on Windows 7 SP1 32Bit, without OTFE



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Questions about Message Tags management

2012-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello mse,
 
 1) Do I understand it correctly, that at the moment it is not possible to
 delete Message Tags? You can create them and add them to a message, but you
 cannot delete them from the tag library.

 2) Is it work by design, that it is not possible to change the name of a
 message tag?

Have you seen my mid:161337125.20120426120...@gmail.com?

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Rick,

Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 5:00:56 PM, you wrote:

R VFs don't show deleted emails. Perhaps that should be a feature request?

Maybe  we  are  not  talking  about  the  same thing, but I have a Virtual 
Folder for today's messages
[I   know,   this   might  sound strange to some :-)] and when I delete 
messages in there, they are still shown, except,
from then on, Trash is being mentioned as the folder they are in.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.6.2



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 3:11:24 PM, Mark Partous wrote:
 
 when I delete messages in there, they are still shown, except,
 from then on, Trash is being mentioned as the folder they are in.
 
empty the trash, and they will most likely no longer be in the virtual 
folder 
  
-- 
 Dwight A. Corrin 
 316.303.9385  phone ahead to fax 
 dcorrin at fastmail.fm 
 photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com 
 photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com 
   http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882 
 Using IMAP with The Bat! 5.1.6.2 on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service Pack 2)



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Questions about Message Tags management

2012-05-22 Thread mse
Hello MAU,

M Hello mse,
M  
 1) Do I understand it correctly, that at the moment it is not possible to
 delete Message Tags? You can create them and add them to a message, but you
 cannot delete them from the tag library.

 2) Is it work by design, that it is not possible to change the name of a
 message tag?

M Have you seen my mid:161337125.20120426120...@gmail.com?

I really should read more... I'll have a look at those threads later on. Thank 
you

Best regards,
mse
-- 
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 Pro on Windows 7 SP1 32Bit, without OTFE



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Questions about Message Tags management

2012-05-22 Thread Mark Partous
Hello mse,

Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 9:51:39 PM, you wrote:

m 1) Do I understand it correctly, that at the moment it is not possible to 
m delete Message Tags? You can create them and add them to a message, but you 
m cannot delete them from the tag library.

It seems so.

m 2) Is it work by design, that it is not possible to change the name of a 
m message tag?

I think that it is a feature for which programming has not been completed yet.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.6.2 





 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Questions about Message Tags management

2012-05-22 Thread Mark Partous
Hello MAU,

Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 10:06:20 PM, you wrote:

M Have you seen my mid:161337125.20120426120...@gmail.com?

I do not have that message anymore. Is that the one in which you said you had 
found a unconventional
trick to delete the tags, without further explanation of the procedure, or did 
you write a follow-up to that one?

Personally I have one tag, the first one I made when the feature became 
available, that doesn't show up when you
right-click  a  message  and  choose labels. The other ones were added after 
installing a more recent version (or beta
ftm) and they do show up.

I suppose that deleting, then recreating the tag (label) would make it show up 
in the right-click-list.


-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.6.2 
MyMacros 1.11a




 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Questions about Message Tags management

2012-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello Mark,
 
M Have you seen my mid:161337125.20120426120...@gmail.com?

 I do not have that message anymore. Is that the one in which you said
 you had found a unconventional trick to delete the tags, without
 further explanation of the procedure, or did you write a follow-up to
 that one?

It is actually a follow up with Subject: About Tags (II).  I do explain 
the 'dirty trick' for deleting tags and many other things.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v5.1.6.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
My photoblog: http://mau.aminus3.com



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 5.1.6.2 VF bug still there

2012-05-22 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Dwight,

Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 10:13:04 PM, you wrote:

DC empty the trash, and they will most likely no longer be in the virtual 
DC folder 

:-)  I would consider that to be a purged message.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.6.2



 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Questions about Message Tags management

2012-05-22 Thread Mark Partous
Hello MAU,

Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 11:19:13 PM, you wrote:

M It is actually a follow up with Subject: About Tags (II).  I do explain 
M the 'dirty trick' for deleting tags and many other things.

Oops, must have escaped me...

Could/would you send me a copy via PM?

Thanks in advance! [Or: No problem! if you can't/don't want to :-)  ]


-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 5.1.6.2




 Current beta is 5.1.4.0 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html