Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-19 Thread Gwen
Hello The,

On Tue, 19 May 2020, at 23:58:15 [GMT +0300] (which was 22:58 where I
live) Maxim wrote:

> Hello Tbbeta,

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> are seven new SSE-based instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for 
> SHA-256.
>
> You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to
> figure out whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for 
> example:
>
> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

My Intel i5-7500 Does not support.

-- 
Regards
Gwen

Using The Bat! Version 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) (32-bit) on Windows 10.0 (Build 18363 )

pgppSrycy4Ooa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-19 Thread Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA
Hello Stuart,

Wednesday, May 20, 2020, 5:06:52 AM, you wrote:

> 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.0014 seconds to process by SHA1 using
> CPU instructions (hardware), 1462.7576 Megabytes per second; 2.2528 seconds to
> process by software implementation, 650.2314 Megabytes per second

Your CPU is fastest amongst us. What is the exact model/make of your CPU?

-- 
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-19 Thread Gleason




Hello Tbbeta,

Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced 
on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for 
these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based 
instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256.

Does not.





You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to figure out 
whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for example:

thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by SHA1 using 
CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per second; 2.1496 seconds to 
process by software implementation, 681.4596 Megabytes per second
---
OK
---


Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.


--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-19 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Maxim,
Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 3:58:15 PM, you wrote:

> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced
> on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for
> these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based
> instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256.

--- SHA1 benchmark --- 

150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.0014 seconds to process by SHA1 using
CPU instructions (hardware), 1462.7576 Megabytes per second; 2.2528 seconds to
process by software implementation, 650.2314 Megabytes per second
--- OK ---


-- 
Best regards,
 Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re:Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-19 Thread Assad Baroot
Hello Maxim,
   
On Wednesday, 20 May 2020, Maxim Masiutin Via Tbbeta wrote and made
these points on the subject of "Does your CPU support hardware SHA1
acceleration?":


> ---
> SHA1 benchmark
> ---
> 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by
> SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per
> second; 2.1496 seconds to process by software implementation, 681.4596 
> Megabytes per second
> ---
> OK   
> ---

Here is my result:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
150  data  blocks  of 1024 bytes took 1.0910 seconds to process by
SHA1  using  CPU  instructions  (hardware),  1342.6752  Megabytes  per
second; 2.1275 seconds to process by software implementation, 688.5177
Megabytes per second
---
OK   
---

-- 
Best regards,
 Assad


Using The Bat! Version 9.1.18.3 (BETA) (64-bit)
under Windows 10.0 Build 18363 
Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Installed Physical Memory: 16.0 GB






'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Does your CPU support hardware SHA1 acceleration?

2020-05-19 Thread Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA
Hello Tbbeta,

Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions introduced 
on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in their processors for 
these instructions starting with Ryzen. There are seven new SSE-based 
instructions, four supporting SHA-1 and three for SHA-256.


You can run The Bat! with /SHA1_BENCHMARK command-line parameter to figure out 
whether your CPU supports SHA1 acceleration instructions, for example:

thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK

On my computer, running The Bat! as above gives the following results:

---
SHA1 benchmark
---
150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 1.3579 seconds to process by SHA1 using 
CPU instructions (hardware), 1078.7605 Megabytes per second; 2.1496 seconds to 
process by software implementation, 681.4596 Megabytes per second
---
OK   
---


Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.


-- 
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin



'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Future of TB* mailing lists

2020-05-19 Thread Joerg Schiermeier
MAU wrote:

> As  long as  the screenshot is less than 51 KB, which is the limit
> for bug tracker.

Uuups, I newer noticed this limitation there. And I uploaded a lot of
screenshots. Every image I uploaded into the bug tracker was proccessed
in my photo editor to get an exact shot of what I want to report.

You are right - until you told me about this limit I never saw this
little hint at the upload field "Maximum size: 51 KB".

-- 
Best regards,

Joerg Schiermeier
Bielefeld, Germany
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
productive: The Bat! pro v8.8.9.0 (32bit) - wine(at)Debian64
test environment (32bit + 64bit): The Bat! pro - latest beta
wine: v5.8 - Debian64/bullseye: v5.4.19-1 (2020-02-13)
emulated windows version (build number): v10.0 64bit (17134)




'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html