8/23/2007 11:39 AM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG ... is Not helpful nor realistic. That is what I was addressing
Can we agree that your dissertation on the merits of HTML did not
address the question? That is what I was addressing. I offered a
different point of view.
--
8/23/2007 4:25 PM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Outlook Express is now the unchangeable default. Something is broke! :'(
Maybe it is all that HTML mail? 8-]}
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
8/23/2007 10:06 PM
Hi Vilius,
On 8/23/2007 Vilius Šumskas wrote:
VŠ Who said that it's ACCEPTABLE? I understand HTML when people send
VŠ commercial newsletters or official goverment letters, but when every
VŠ folk on a planet uses HTML only to send a message in red (or whatever)
VŠ just to say
8/23/2007 10:09 PM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG It doesn't matter if it
RG 1) Takes more bandwidth
RG 2) Takes more processor power
RG 3) Is unacceptable and stupid
RG 4) Made default by Microsoft
RG THAT IS THE WAY IT IS WHETHER OR NOT WE LIKE IT!!
Only for the people
8/22/2007 1:05 PM
Hi Indie_Dev,
On 8/22/2007 Indie_Dev wrote:
I As someone else pointed out, that does not work if you have
I View/Attach Files (to Button) as the attachment setting, which is what I had
set.
It seems illogical for it to work that way with that view setting. It
seems you want
8/22/2007 2:14 PM
Hi Indie_Dev,
On 8/22/2007 Indie_Dev wrote:
I Well, that can be resolved by just not reading topics that don't
I interest you.
There was a great solution for this, the filter I just created sends
your messages to the trash. It allows me to focus on the contributors
who clean
8/22/2007 2:57 PM
Hi Rick,
On 8/22/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG but there ARE some inconsistencies with the way some
RG things are implemented. I have had issues (sorting and threading if I
RG remember correctly) where it did not work the way it SAID it should
RG work. Too many were quick to
8/18/2007 9:28 AM
Hi Roelof,
On 8/17/2007 Roelof Otten wrote:
MM [-] When replying to messages, caret was not placed into editor
RO Yes! That was a real bother.
If this is a caret [^] I propose this [] is a right-angle bracket.
True, or did I misunderstand?
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager
8/18/2007 9:33 AM
Hi Eddie,
On 8/18/2007 Eddie Castelli wrote:
EC Today, when rebooting TB!, I got this window coming up - for the first
EC time ever. The window filled the whole screen. I found it a bit
EC strange! Any idea what this is?
It seems something changed the file extension
8/18/2007 2:31 PM
Hi Eddie,
On 8/18/2007 Eddie Castelli wrote:
EC Is VCF a TB! file extension? I couldn't fine any in the prog folder.
See this link for explanation:
http://filext.com/file-extension/vcf
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
8/10/2007 11:04 AM
Hi Rick,
On 8/10/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
moderator on
You're using a very bad signature
delimiter.
You're using HTML without any apparent
reason.
moderator off
RG The delimiter I use and have not changed in months is --
RG All of a sudden it is not respecting that
7/31/2007 2:47 PM
Hi Stuart,
On 7/31/2007 Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC Ask for confirmation
SC Ignore Changes
SC Save
This applies to changes to the currently selected View Mode, not to a
change to a different View Mode.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP
7/31/2007 3:18 PM
Hi Rick,
On 7/31/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Thanks for the reply. THAT is not obvious though in preferences sice
RG you can manage your views there.
Agreed, it does seem to be somewhat ambiguous.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP
7/9/2007 11:58 AM
Hi Vili,
On 7/9/2007 Vili wrote:
V When I sent it and downloaded it, MY COMMENT DISAPPEARED. I would not
V believe that it happened, if I would not have the source in my sent
V mail and the source in my inbox... The comment is vanished...
V How could it happen??? I can
7/9/2007 12:14 PM
Hi Vili,
On 7/9/2007 Vili wrote:
V Thanks Paul. So, we can agree that it is a bug, right? If I write
V something into the body of an email, and that does not arrive, that is
V a bug...
Seems that way to me.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1
6/2/2007 9:23 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 6/2/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I was thinking about what Mr. D. said, and I couldn't come up with a
TF reason why there should be two versions and not only the Voyager
TF variety (if Voyager allowed the choice of whether to use OTFE or not).
TF He might have
5/17/2007 8:08 AM
Hi Vilius,
On 5/17/2007 Vilius Šumskas wrote:
VŠ Well, 5 last servers I built have IMAP only. The only difference user
VŠ can see is he must delete email twice :). POP3 was invented for
VŠ dialup users, where you just want to connect with modem download email
VŠ and
5/17/2007 9:45 AM
Hi Vilius,
On 5/17/2007 Vilius Šumskas wrote:
VŠ Why is that? You can store IMAP cache DB on local encrypted drive
VŠ just like you are storing POP3. From the filesystem perspective
VŠ point of view they are just ordinary files.
Explain that to a neophyte half way around the
5/13/2007 7:29 PM
Hi Rick,
On 5/13/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Even when you have to be able to carry the data in your pocket?:))
Mine fits there although heavier than I like. As Vili stated there is
value in flash drives. However, the discussion was on maintaining data
integrity which makes
5/12/2007 7:10 PM
Hi Vili,
On 5/12/2007 Vili wrote:
V No. I completely understand. And that is my WHOLE point: you have
V great experience with Voyager if you use a HDD, and not running from a
V USB stick. If you can. A _completely different_ experience. That is
V what I tried to say.
5/7/2007 2:35 PM
Hi Vili,
On 5/7/2007 Vili wrote:
V (What I observed is, that running Voyager from a USB stick is just not
V the way to go...)
Unless you use Win2K. 8-]}
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
4/13/2007 7:51 AM
Hi Axel,
On 4/12/2007 Axel wrote:
A Well, here i go again, answering in order, my OS is Win XP Pro, yes,
A MSOE and Thunderbird, yes the clicking works fine, my default browser is
A Opera, but i've also tried with IE, Firefox, Netscape and Flock, the
A problem started the
4/12/2007 10:10 AM
Hi Maxim,
On 4/12/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Marek Mikus has submitted 1000 bug reports to the bugtracker, and
MM has considerably contributed to The Bat! Development by
MM confirming, submitting and resolving bugs. Ritlabs honours Marek
MM Mikus with The Award (see
3/24/2007 1:30 PM
Hi Vili,
On 3/24/2007 Vili wrote:
V I would call it a bug, not an embarassment.
Depends on one's perception of value..
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Current
3/24/2007 1:52 PM
Hi Rick,
On 3/24/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG A bug yes, and embarrassment YES. It is the equivalent of coming to
RG visit and not flushing the toilet :))
Most folks can't even find this bathroom let alone the toilet. I doubt
they will recognize the contents.
However, it
3/24/2007 2:49 PM
Hi Thomas,
On 3/24/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF would expect Voyager to leave no traces.
Me too.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Current beta is 3.98.07 |
3/12/2007 7:21 AM
Hi Ian,
On 3/11/2007 Ian A. White wrote:
IAW Ctrl+C for Copy (because of the C for copy)
IAW Ctrl+X for Cut (because the X looks a bit like scissors if you squint)
IAW Ctrl+V for Paste (because the V looks like an arrow pointing to where
IAW I want the items placed)
IAW I
3/8/2007 4:45 PM
Hi Vili,
On 3/8/2007 Vili wrote:
V This is how it should be done.
A real cutie!
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
3/8/2007 5:02 PM
HTML
Hi Vili,
Creating an HTML file with any external editor and attaching it with
the graphics does work here. However, if the HTML text is not
duplicated in the text portion of the message nothing shows on the
test tab.
Take Care,
Paul
3/6/2007 8:32 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 3/6/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I'll do. When I redirect HTML messages (when they were sent to the
TF wrong department), the BCC copy to myself shows a blank email with an
TF HTML attachment. That's what triggered my theory.
Not so here. Check your
3/4/2007 7:37 AM
Hi Mark,
On 3/4/2007 Mark Partous wrote:
PVN History proves 80% of the people are wrong 80% of the time.
MP That's easily said but hardly proven.
Not so. A true historian can substantiate it.
PVN I want to remain with the 20%.
MP Since these 20% are purely fictional, you
3/4/2007 1:43 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 3/4/2007 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK I see that more and more companies switch from using HTML for formatted
ASK letters to a real business letter that comes in a PDF, attached to a
ASK simple plaintext message. The compressed format of PDF with embedded
ASK
3/4/2007 6:37 PM
Hi Thomas,
On 3/4/2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
PVN The US Dept. of Defense has banned HTML and Microsoft email clients
PVN and for good reason.
TF I'm not so very sure of this, because they are one of the clients
TF sending me HTMLs mails, the formatting - and even colouring
3/4/2007 1:25 AM
Hi Thomas,
TF Here is a wish for v4: Please let us use external editors. This wish
TF came up first, I think, already during v1 times. I do need to reply in
TF HTML to some messages in the office, and the TB! HTML editor produces
TF embarrasing results (starting from that blue
2/27/2007 7:31 AM
Hi Roger,
On 2/27/2007 Roger Phillips wrote:
RP 1. It seems only able only to look for an 'existing archive' in the form of
RP a file which has a name like 001.tbk; I presume this is to enable it to
RP increment the number. IMO it would be better if it could look for a
2/26/2007 1:52 PM
Hi Vili,
On 2/26/2007 Vili wrote:
V Hello Maxim,
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_pro_3-98-1.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/thebat_home_3-98-1.msi
V First installed and the autobackup is turned on by default. Not good.
V Default
2/26/2007 3:42 PM
Hi Maxim,
On 2/26/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
First installed and the autobackup is turned on by default. Not good.
Default should be tuned off.
MM What is the reason for this feature to be turned off by default?
What good is a backup on a local machine when the hard drive
2/26/2007 4:17 PM
Hi Simon,
On 2/26/2007 Simon wrote:
S definite No thanks option that disables the feature - no blame
S can then be levelled at the software or the developer if the user is that
stupid.
Declining an automated process is hardly stupidity. If done out of
ignorance it is
2/26/2007 6:22 PM
Hi Ian,
On 2/26/2007 Ian A. White wrote:
S ... and yes, those that don't backup are stupid, 'if' they have
S valuable content in their mail system and do not take adequate
S precautions; clearly that doesn't apply to you or I :)
IAW Yes, automatic backups are the only way to
2/24/2007 12:33 PM
Hi MAU,
On 2/24/2007 MAU wrote:
M I would agree to this if there was no Auto backup option in
M Preferences/System, just the task in Scheduler. But I think it is much
M more confusing and annoying for anyone if you disable an option in
M Preferences but you can still see
2/24/2007 2:27 PM
Hi MAU,
On 2/24/2007 MAU wrote:
I'm with you Miguel.
M Thanks. Let's go and have a beer ;)
Great idea! I'll be in North Africa late August. Where should we meet?
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
2/23/2007 9:42 AM
Hi Vili,
On 2/23/2007 Vili wrote:
V Hello Nick,
After starting Voyager, the very first time I click on an email to
write a new mail, it gives me a No disk in drive error.
Can't confirm, and I regularly use Voyager on three different
computers. (all using XP, should that
2/22/2007 2:16 PM
Hi MAU,
On 2/22/2007 MAU wrote:
Right-clicking on a folder and choosing Delete instead of Empty...
I know, been there done that.
M Me too. That's why I have used Customiser to 're-design' Folder Pop-up
M Menu.
A trick I use is to keep at least 1 parked message in the
2/21/2007 8:27 AM
Hi Martin,
On 2/21/2007 Martin Sebald wrote:
MS VERY time-consuming because you have to use several tools to sync the
MS folders in folder view and on the hard drive. I don't lie when I write that
MS this takes hours.
Right-clicking on a folder and choosing Delete instead of
2/21/2007 8:58 AM
Hi Martin,
On 2/21/2007 Martin Sebald wrote:
MS Hm and how does this help me with the problem? I don't want to delete
MS folders, I want to get folders back into the folder list.
Since prevention is the best cure it might be a possible explanation
for disappearance.
--
2/20/2007 2:32 PM
Hi Hendrik,
On 2/20/2007 Hendrik Oesterlin wrote:
HO Cees wrote on 21/02/2007 at 04:53:07 +1100
HO subject amount of email addresses :
is there a maximum amount of emailaddresses to one mail to sent (an
invitation) e-mail to? Can I write one message to for
2/20/2007 2:34 PM
Hi Cees,
On 2/20/2007 Cees wrote:
C been playing around a bit with that option.
C But that means that I would have to click on Send 1400 times! I'll go for a
C message with many addresses in the bcc-field.
If you look at the options you will see that TB will put the
2/20/2007 5:17 PM
Hi Cees,
On 2/20/2007 Cees wrote:
C created a test group in my addressbook, added just myself and started to
C play with it. One of the fellow organising members of the project group sent
C me a message as it should be but... that was in html including some
C
2/18/2007 1:28 PM
Hi Vili,
On 2/18/2007 Vili wrote:
V I see. Ok, I will upgrade. I use Voyager on Win98 only one month a
V year :), but now it would have been important :). Ok, upgrade. And
V thanks.
Voyager 3.95.06 has been rock solid. I only recall one minor complaint
that Max said would be
2/15/2007 9:23 AM
Hi Andreas,
On 2/15/2007 Andreas Rumpenhorst wrote:
Sure wish there was a Linux version of TB!
AR Already supported the wish on
AR https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3879 ?
Thanks! I just added my $.02.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1
2/14/2007 7:59 AM
Hi Alto,
On 2/14/2007 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
Well, he wrote this using Voyager 3.95.06, which seems pretty up-to-date.
AS No, the problem is indeed only seen with v3.0.1.33. In Voyager (current
AS non-beta) the virtual folders don't vanish - instead, they simply
AS don't
2/14/2007 5:12 PM
Hi Rick,
On 2/14/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
Why does that make me feel queasy?
You tell us.
RG Trust issues with Microsoft. :)) As long as you wear suitable armor -
RG make sure you have extra protection on the buttocks area. :))
Makes passing watermelons easy! Sure wish
2/13/2007 7:26 AM
Hi Alto,
On 2/13/2007 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
If only you are affected [...]
AS He is not.
AS However, here it only happens with Virtual Folders - create them,
AS close TheBat, open TheBat - poof, folder vanished into thin air. This
AS is completly reproducable.
AS (As
2/13/2007 1:26 PM
Hi Martin,
On 2/13/2007 Martin Sebald wrote:
MS But fact is, that people have problems with TB you don't have. Could you
MS please just accept that?
Perhaps different management techniques bring more positive results.
If this statement is true then it is also possible that
2/13/2007 3:00 PM
Hi Alexander,
ASK From you're directorylisting I can see that the folder configuration is
ASK named account.flb no matter if the installation is in OTFE mode or in
ASK plain mode.
Not here. The file is named account.efb and is encrypted.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager
2/13/2007 3:39 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 2/13/2007 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK Hello Paul Van Noord everyone else,
ASK on Tuesday, February 13, 2007 at 21:02 you (Paul Van Noord) wrote:
ASK From you're directorylisting I can see that the folder
ASK configuration is named account.flb no matter
2/12/2007 7:47 AM
Hi Martin,
On 2/12/2007 Martin Sebald wrote:
MS Or how do you call it when for example Windows is loosing folders from time
MS to time? Oh no problem, must be a user problem... Don't blame Microsoft!
Dunno' been using computers 20 years and consulting for 18 and am
still
2/12/2007 5:56 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 2/12/2007 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK Well, feel free to do so. Maybe it will spare us your unconstructive
ASK criticism. Everybody wants his/her bugs fixed first. I want *my* bugs
ASK fixed first.
ASK To start withm, your 1st problem could be that there
2/11/2007 1:27 PM
Hi Marck,
On 2/7/2007 Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP I don't know. I've said it before, I'm sure. It's quite a pain, trying
MDP to reply to an HTML message in plain text, my preferred format.
For me, a constant reminder why I choose plain text over HTML.
--
Take Care,
Paul
2/11/2007 7:49 PM
Hi Martin,
On 2/11/2007 Martin Sebald wrote:
MS Why
MS does this work for everybody exept me?
MS Again I am complaining about a serious bug (and again nobody of Ritlabs
MS will care about this). Loosing folders is bad, especially when having OTFE
MS enabled.
If only you are
1/30/2007 7:38 AM
Hi Bob,
On 1/30/2007 Bob Riley wrote:
BR Thank you MAU - and all the rest of you who have posed such creative
BR ideas about what the problem could be.
BR So far, so good!
BR Adieu,
BR Bob Riley
BR
BR Current beta
1/29/2007 2:29 PM
Hi Peter,
On 1/29/2007 Peter Gannushkin wrote:
PG That is not true. TB! generates tmp files when it compresses your
PG folders. They supposed to be deleted after the compression, but often
PG enough TB! either dies or the process is cancelled by the user. In
PG either of
1/29/2007 3:23 PM
Hi Peter,
On 1/29/2007 Peter Meyns wrote:
PM They don't appear in a message folder. Have a look at C:\Documents and
PM Settings\Username\Local Settings\Temp - that's where they
PM accumulate... :(
Peter Gannushkin said he had one in his Inbox folder. I do not get
them in
1/29/2007 4:31 PM
Hi Peter,
On 1/29/2007 Peter Gannushkin wrote:
PG What exactly is your point?
I guess my point is that management technique may impact the problem
of temp files remaining in message folders.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
1/22/2007 7:31 PM
Hi Eddie,
On 1/22/2007 Eddie Castelli wrote:
EC Yeah I know. I am not upgrading regularly. But still this is a Beta.
EC I do hope some of you who reports more regular than me and ad the same
EC problems (before) but now probably seeming to be ok, could voice out
EC on this.
1/17/2007 10:20 AM
Hi Stuart,
On 1/17/2007 Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC Makes you not want to click on a hyper link in an HTML mail ever
SC again. Maybe a window should pop up warning you that the underlying
SC link is not the same as the link you are clicking on.
Makes text messages seem a lot
1/13/2007 4:33 PM
Hi Martin,
On 1/13/2007 Martin Schoch wrote:
You start it by double clicking voyager.exe in the file manager, don't
you? What does the error message state?
MS I have to do more tests - at the moment it seems to me that the
MS described problem occurs on Windows 2000
1/10/2007 7:03 AM
Hi Peter,
On 1/10/2007 Peter Hampf wrote:
PH at work I am using Voyager which starts from an encrypted disc. I just
PH saw the file global.ini with a size of 160.000 bytes and found over
PH 4000 - fourthousand - lines like this in it:
PH
1/6/2007 7:54 AM
Hi Nick,
On 1/5/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND First thing I noticed was that this was the first ever version of TB!
ND to cause MS firewall to pop-up and ask if I wanted to allow TB!
ND access. Naturally I said yes. I ran it for quite awhile and never so
ND much as a hint of a
1/6/2007 8:23 AM
Hi Rick,
On 1/6/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Every time I upgrade the betas Zone Alarm catches the program change
RG and asks to verify that it is ok This is a good thing as long as you
RG are aware of the change and it is not some nefarious program changing
RG the executable
1/6/2007 9:00 PM
Hi Victor,
On 1/6/2007 Victor Star wrote:
VS No, I believe this is different bug. The bug you've quoted has
VS been there forever and still is very annoying. But the bug we're
VS talking about is something new. In this case there's no problem to
VS cancel POP-session. The
1/4/2007 3:59 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/4/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND It's nice to finally be of use to someone after all these years of
ND hanging around the community!
Don't worry, this is good stuff!
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
1/2/2007 12:04 PM
Voyager 3.95.06
Hi Max,
I have been using this version of Voyager for several days and I want
to thank you for an excellent release. It is very stable and
performance is very good. I have not yet found anything that does not
function flawlessly and quickly.
Thank You Very
1/2/2007 12:35 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND Am I the only one that has the Options|Preferences menu acting wacky
ND with everything below Other options are out of whack?
ND It's been this way with this and the release previous to this for me.
ND But fine with any version
1/2/2007 2:51 PM
Hi Peter,
On 1/2/2007 Peter Ouwehand wrote:
PO Hello Nick Danger,
PO on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:27:02 -0600 (2007-01-02 18:27:02 in .nl) in the
PO message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
PO [ND] wrote (at least in part):
ND Thanks for any confirmation or lack thereof.
1/2/2007 3:59 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND But are all the nested menus under there okay?
ND For at least three of us they are out of sync with smart bat functions
ND missing.
You are right, Character Sets dialog is missing and the others appear
one below where they belong
1/2/2007 4:02 PM
Hi Peter,
On 1/2/2007 Peter Ouwehand wrote:
PO Hello Paul Van Noord,
PO on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:32:27 -0500 (2007-01-02 21:32:27 in .nl) in the
PO message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
PO [PN] wrote (at least in part):
PVN It is available at [Other Options]. See
1/2/2007 5:22 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote:
ND https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158
ND Hopefully I didn't botch protocol too awfully bad.
Just added my .02.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
1/2/2007 5:45 PM
Hi Maxim,
On 1/2/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Thank you, we will take care of the bug
MM https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158
Thank You Very Much!
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
12/31/2006 9:44 AM
Hi Alto,
On 12/31/2006 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS this affair is also why I'm not recommending TheBat any more
AS neither for private nor for business use any more.
Sad for the others.
AS Not here: I have an installation on which the same message base files
AS are used by
12/30/2006 9:09 AM
Hi MAU,
On 12/29/2006 MAU wrote:
M Hello Thomas,
M I have never tried Vogager. Is there a possibility of doing so without
M using OTFE?
No, Voyager uses OTFE by default, and it cannot be turned off.
M I don't know why it shouldn't be optional. I hate it when someone else
12/30/2006 9:22 AM
Hi MAU,
On 12/29/2006 MAU wrote:
M Aside of that I understand that, when using OTFE, folders (and file
M names?) in disk have 'funny unrecognisable names'. If it is true, I
M don't like that at all.
Like using Windows, you gradually get used to it.
--
Take Care,
Paul
12/30/2006 10:16 AM
Hi MAU,
On 12/30/2006 MAU wrote:
M Please do not insist. _I_ want to decide if I want to be protected or
M not. Period.
I hear you _and_ I understand. However, you seem to miss the total
purpose of Voyager. It grew out of Secure Bat with security as a
primary purpose. If
12/30/2006 10:25 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 12/30/2006 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I've never had runtime errors with Voyager. I also find that the
TF reaction speed depends on the host computer.
Neither have I had errors. I find that Win 2K is significantly faster
than XP when using USB 2 even when the
12/25/2006 9:50 AM
Hi Maxim,
On 12/23/2006 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Hello Paul,
MM Saturday, December 23, 2006, 20:00:50, you wrote:
Sorry Max, not here. Focus stays with main window, etc. Earlier
versions are OK.
MM Which of the earlier versions are OK? What about 3.95.04?
Sorry for the
12/25/2006 9:49 AM
Hi Rick,
On 12/25/2006 Rick Grunwald wrote:
My guess is a poorly written folder template. Folder templates are
RG In the filder temlates it has the default %NLANK the address book
RG templates for this group is as follows (This is the reply the new
RG message of course does
12/23/2006 12:59 PM
Hi Maxim,
On 12/23/2006 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Hello Charlie,
MM Saturday, December 23, 2006, 19:26:09, you wrote:
I hope this includes voyager and it's decendents.
MM Voyager 3.86.03 is OK under Win98.
Sorry Max, not here. Focus stays with main window, etc. Earlier
12/21/2006 3:15 PM
Hi Peter,
On 12/21/2006 Peter Meyns wrote:
PM Hi all,
PM yesterday I upgraded my girlfriend's TB!. She has an old notebook
PM running Win98SE with a P2 processor at 233 MHz. TB! starts normally
PM (the Christmas splash screen found her approval), but the main window
PM
12/21/2006 3:17 PM
Hi Peter,
On 12/21/2006 Peter Meyns wrote:
PM Hi Maxim,
PM on Thu, 21 Dec 2006 20:03:23 +0200GMT (21.12.2006, 19:03 +0100GMT here),
PM you wrote:
MM Thursday, December 21, 2006, 19:42:28, you wrote:
yesterday I upgraded my girlfriend's TB!. She has an old notebook
12/21/2006 3:27 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 12/21/2006 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK If you're going to use Voyager from a USB device on Win98 you'll need a
ASK driver for the USB device first. :-)
True. However a minor problem when one carries the driver on a CD.
ASK TB is way more complex than it
12/14/2006 12:22 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 12/14/2006 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK Is there a reason to not use the local machine name?
ASK I think that disclosing the LAN IP without the need to do so might be
ASK considered a security issue by some people.
agreed.
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager
12/6/2006 8:07 AM
Hi Alexander,
On 12/5/2006 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK A lot of ISPs are blocking the connection if the sending SMTP client is
ASK sending a HELO of localhost, friend, 127.0.0.1, etc. because they
ASK are a typical identifier for botnet zombies.
ASK I just verified this. TB
11/16/2006 7:26 AM
Hi Rick,
On 11/16/2006 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG I may need a lesson then since I had this warning once before and DID
RG do something about it. I installed the Plain text editor as a button
RG and it SEEMS to be changing the message to plain text. If it was in
RG HTML to
11/1/2006 6:38 AM
Hi Vili,
On 11/1/2006 Vili wrote:
V Hello Roelof,
Please stop acting like a moderator, whether you're right or wrong
isn't the issue.
moderator off
V In my country, when my prime minister admits that he lied, and the
V party driven by him would not remove him
10/31/2006 5:05 AM
Hi Stuart,
On 10/31/2006 Stuart Hemming wrote:
V All of your issues are TBUDL issues... Please move your problems
V there.
SH I'm not subscribed to that. I just sat here struggling to get working.
SH I just want some help.
SH --
SH Stuart Hemming,
SH
10/31/2006 10:54 AM
Hi Stuart,
On 10/31/2006 Stuart Hemming wrote:
SH So, I create a new message (this one), I 'fix' the delimiter by adding
SH the trailing space. There is no evidence (in the MicroEd editor that
SH I'm using) that the space is there. Now, believe me, I've put it in,
SH let's
10/30/2006 12:22 PM
Hi Stuart,
On 10/30/2006 Stuart Hemming wrote:
SH On 30/10/06, Jernej Simonèiè [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SH
SH Eh? US has lifted the ban on exporting encryption technology to most
SH countries years ago. What application is that, I bet you can find it on an
SH
10/24/2006 5:15 PM
Hi Martin,
On 10/24/2006 Martin Schuster wrote:
MS Yes, but as I said: I don't like the thought of having to open a
MS flip-open menu three times to assign three labels to a message. I'd
MS prefer to have the menu open with checkboxes or something, or
MS a solution like
10/24/2006 10:18 PM
Hi Thomas,
On 10/24/2006 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF Some people prefer the mouse, others the keyboard, again others
TF tickboxes. Once the functionality is implemented, that's only a
TF question of the GUI, and I would suggest that the feature should be
TF accessible by all
10/23/2006 5:15 AM
Hi MAU,
On 10/23/2006 MAU wrote:
M Hello Thomas,
The colour groups are assigned by filters.
M Or just manually my friend, or just manually :)
The virtual folders are search results, a way of filtering just for
display, but filtering nevertheless. These filters also
301 - 400 of 765 matches
Mail list logo
