On Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 16:02:09, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I see. The total concept looks like a very good idea then.
...and now countdown until those e-mail servers start deleting
messages retrieved with TOP :)
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >
[ The Bat! 4.
Hello Thomas,
Friday, March 13, 2009, 19:18:51, you wrote:
>>I never understood this one. Reading the RFC, I am no wiser about TOP
>>versus RETR. Can somebody kindly explain to me what I would need this
>>for?
TOP returns first N lines of a message, but if N is very large, it will return
the wh
Freitag, 13. März 2009 at 18:01, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Do you use Voyager when you're outside? If so, do you mean you use the
> Dispatcher?
Yes, thats true, both.
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat! 4.1.11.6 m
Hello Jens,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:40:07 +0100 GMT (13/Mar/09, 23:40 +0700 GMT),
Jens Franik wrote:
TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the
Lines
>> I see. And why again would I need that in TheBat?
JF> It is more Fast - the first or the second way (i do
Freitag, 13. März 2009 at 16:36, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>>> TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the
>>> Lines
> I see. And why again would I need that in TheBat?
It is more Fast - the first or the second way (i dont know).
And you need it, while you start up the
Hello NetVicious,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:22:41 +0100 GMT (13/Mar/09, 6:22 +0700 GMT),
NetVicious wrote:
>> TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the
>> Lines
I see. And why again would I need that in TheBat?
>> as far as i remember my last Telenet to SMTP :-)
I tho
jueves, 12 mar 2009 at 21:19, it seems you wrote:
> TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the
> Lines as far as i remember my last Telenet to SMTP :-)
Your memory it's ok, dot enter enter ;-)
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 4.1.11.6 Professional
/
Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 at 18:18, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I never understood this one. Reading the RFC, I am no wiser about TOP
> versus RETR. Can somebody kindly explain to me what I would need this
> for?
TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the
Lines as far a
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:57:59 +0200 GMT (16/Dec/08, 17:57 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM> The Bat! 4.1.1.5 RC1 (BETA) is available at
MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb4115.rar
[...]
MM> [+] /POP3FORCETOP command line option to use "TOP" command instead
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:51:35 +0200 GMT (16/12/2008, 21:51 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
>>>If I did, I would have to add the required "n" parameter too,
>>>wouldn't I?
MM> No, The Bat! does this automatically to retreive a full message.
I see. The total concept looks like a ver
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 16:08:17, you wrote:
>>If I did, I would have to add the required "n" parameter too,
>>wouldn't I?
No, The Bat! does this automatically to retreive a full message.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:m...@ritlabs.com
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:47:19 +0200 GMT (16/12/2008, 20:47 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
>>>Just asking: What is this good for?
MM> There are some servers (not quite usual) that remove a message
MM> that have been retrieved by RETR, so if you will get it from one
MM> computer , y
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 15:20:04, you wrote:
>>Just asking: What is this good for?
There are some servers (not quite usual) that remove a message that have been
retrieved by RETR, so if you will get it from one computer , you will be unable
to also get it on another. This opti
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:57:59 +0200 GMT (16/12/2008, 17:57 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM> [+] /POP3FORCETOP command line option to use "TOP" command instead of
"RETR" on POP3
Just asking: What is this good for?
>From RFC1725 we learn:
RETR msg
Arguments:
14 matches
Mail list logo
