Hello Fabio
SR Nope, not here, no false positives here since installing it.
ven, gen 07 2005, 00:02:10, DNS-BLACKLISTED, Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], From: Sean Rima
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Subject: Re: BayesFilter 201: Much more
aggressive?, Score: 100, Reason: cached DNS request
Mon, Jan 10
Hello Graham!
On Monday, January 10, 2005 at 10:20:11 AM you wrote:
Dierk Ethan seem to have a problem about being blacklisted too :-(
It's not us or our domains specifically. After reading up on it I
guess it is pure coincidence if anyone - in this case me and Ethan -
get filtered; looks
Hello Dierk
To relieve oneself from too much false positives is to increase the
number of hits for classifying as spam from the default 2; I use 8
since 4 was still too low.
As the default install only comes with 8 blacklist sites, and the
message in the UI says is DNS count ABOVE n, then by
Hello Graham!
On Monday, January 10, 2005 at 11:12:46 AM you wrote:
As the default install only comes with 8 blacklist sites, and the
message in the UI says is DNS count ABOVE n, then by increasing it
to 8 are you really just disabling the blacklisting? (or have you
added more sites?)
Got
Dierk Haasis wrotes on 10/01/2005 at 21:25:30 +1100
subject BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive? :
Hello Graham!
On Monday, January 10, 2005 at 11:12:46 AM you wrote:
As the default install only comes with 8 blacklist sites, and the
message in the UI says is DNS count ABOVE n
if someone has problems with false sorted mails please send me the part of
the logfile so that i can see what happens, so that i can fix the possible
problems.
achim
Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
SR Nope, not here, no false positives here since installing it.
ven, gen 07 2005, 00:02:10, DNS-BLACKLISTED, Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
From: Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED], Subject: Re: BayesFilter 201: Much more
aggressive?, Score: 100, Reason: cached DNS request
--
Fabio
SR Nope, not here, no false positives here since installing it.
you may not believe this but your message was my first false positive.
--
Fabio
Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Reply to message sent 1/6/2005, @ 09:17:45 (2:17 AM Locally)
~~~
Hello Dierk,
Anybody seen something similar?
Yep. After I installed the update I noticed no mail had come in. I
check the junk filter and everything that had arrived
Hello Fabio,
Friday, January 7, 2005, 10:36:42 AM, you wrote:
SR Nope, not here, no false positives here since installing it.
you may not believe this but your message was my first false positive.
LOL, must be my sig :)
Sean
--
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM:
Hello TBBETA Members!
Yesterday I installed Achim's bug-fixed BF 2.0.1. Before that I
very, very rarely had a false positive (by 2.0 and predecessors),
all in all I can only remember four instances and they were easily
explainable.
This morning I polled my mail and four out of six
Hello Dierk,
Thursday, January 6, 2005, 3:17:45 AM, you wrote:
Yesterday I installed Achim's bug-fixed BF 2.0.1. Before that I
very, very rarely had a false positive (by 2.0 and predecessors),
all in all I can only remember four instances and they were easily
explainable.
This
Dierk,
On 06-01-2005 09:17, you [DH] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DH Yesterday I installed Achim's bug-fixed BF 2.0.1. Before that I
DH very, very rarely had a false positive (by 2.0 and predecessors),
DH all in all I can only remember four instances and they were easily
DH
Dierk Haasis wrotes on 06/01/2005 at 19:17:45 +1100
subject BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive? :
This morning I polled my mail and four out of six messages from this
list were suddenly deemed Junk. I didn't change any of my settings.
Anybody seen something similar?
no false
Hello Hendrik!
On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 1:59:10 PM you wrote:
no false positives here. Please look in the Bayesfilter-logfile if it
was the Bayesian or the Regex method that caused your false positives!
I went through the log with a machete to extract the significant
entries; here are
Dierk,
On 06-01-2005 14:26, you [DH] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ursache: gespeicherte DNS-Anfrage
DNSBL.
Ursache: dnsbl.sorbs.net list.dsbl.org
And again.
Ursache: gespeicherte DNS-Anfrage
And again.
So it is due to the fact that DNSBL finally works.
DH Curiously my own message was
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 2:36:58 PM you wrote:
I does not look like you are on lists (to any greater extent).
Hm, as far as I can interpret the results, I'd say it was pure
coincidence that my own message got filtered/blacklisted. Shouldn't
be; I just notched up the number
hello,
please check the logfile which filter catched the false sorted mails. if
it was the dns blacklist filter, try to increase the default value for dns
filtering. if it was the regular expression filter try to increase the
threshold value. alternative you can disable one of them or both!!!
Hello Achim!
On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 8:02:33 PM you wrote:
please check the logfile which filter catched the false sorted mails. if
it was the dns blacklist filter, try to increase the default value for dns
filtering.
At least the messages I found the lines in the log for showed DNS
Hello Dierk,
Thursday, January 6, 2005, 8:17:45 AM, you wrote:
Hello TBBETA Members!
Yesterday I installed Achim's bug-fixed BF 2.0.1. Before that I
very, very rarely had a false positive (by 2.0 and predecessors),
all in all I can only remember four instances and they were easily
2005-01-06|09:17 you wrote:
This morning I polled my mail and four out of six messages from this
list were suddenly deemed Junk. I didn't change any of my settings.
Anybody seen something similar?
Not here - on contrary: my plug-in seems to be overtained: ver 2.0 and
2.0.1 seems to be more
21 matches
Mail list logo
