Re: The Bat! v2.11 Beta/9 is now available

2004-06-03 Thread Thomas Lieblang
Hi 9Val, on Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:08:55 +0300 you wrote: SmartBat.ini, I have mistaken Ensure that string [Options] doesn't contain any other symbol on it (nothing before '[', nothing after ']'), except CR Ok, no more problems, after I found the right place for this file. -- regards, Thomas

Smilies and Political Correctness (was: The Bat! v2.11 Beta/9 is now available)

2004-05-29 Thread Carsten Thönges
* writes: The Bat! v2.11 Beta/9 is now available from http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ I see there is a new images folder included in the archive. I also see that you removed the fu-smilie (so I guess it is legal again to write fu in e-mails). Well, I can still see the smilies gun.ico

Re: Beta/9 Performance Issue

2003-06-09 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Saturday, June 7, 2003, at 06:24:17 [UTC-0400] (Saturday, June 7, 2003 12:24 my local time) Bill McCarthy wrote: snip BM I retested on 1.62r and didn't see any performance problems for those BM two cases. There appears to be some regex evaluation slowdown in the BM Beta. The regexp

Re: 1.63 Beta/9

2003-06-07 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
involved, MDP there's no way of saying. RS This is what is affecting my AB templates: RS %IF:%ABToLastName=list:%TOFNAME:%- RS %ABToNamePrefix='%ABToFirstName=#%ABofromFIRSTNAME=.%TOFNAME.#'%- RS %TO=%TO='%ABofromNAME=''%TONAME'' %TOADDR' ,-/ ABN for beta 9 \ | %CAPITAL(%IF:%ABtoLastName=list

Beta/9 Performance Issue

2003-06-07 Thread Bill McCarthy
or not and in any order. I tested it with every possibility I could think of (21 test messages). I ran into two problems with Beta/9. The first is it didn't work for any of the 21 tests. Changing the ending `\n\n\z` to `\n\z` had it working fine in Beta/9 - something changed in Beta/9 wrt, I think, space

Re: 1.63 Beta/9

2003-06-07 Thread Allie Martin
=- | List Moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/9 on WinXP Pro SP1 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 1.63b9 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: 1.63 Beta/9

2003-06-07 Thread Bill McCarthy
')%- Z It works good with Beta 8 and Beta 9. Here, it _does_ keep the Re: in the subject line but in the instance where the subject contains words in square brackets (for example Re: [something] sth) it cuts out the bracketed phrase :( Check out the one I posted to this tread. To stop

Re[2]: PGP auto-signing with pgp dll definitely broken with beta 9

2003-06-06 Thread Cees
Hallo Allie, Op een vrijdag 6 juni 2003 om 13:25:35 schreef jij over Re[2]: PGP auto-signing with pgp dll definitely broken with beta 9: AM Let's see if the integrated pgp6 support works. AM Neither works, so this is a manual signature. Testing it too... btw 'Open PGP Key Manager' and 'Open

Re[3]: PGP auto-signing with pgp dll definitely broken with beta 9

2003-06-06 Thread Cees
Hallo Cees, Op een vrijdag 6 juni 2003 om 14:53:35 schreef jij over Re[3]: PGP auto-signing with pgp dll definitely broken with beta 9: C Hallo Allie, C Op een vrijdag 6 juni 2003 om 13:25:35 schreef jij over Re[2]: PGP C auto-signing with pgp dll definitely broken with beta 9: AM Let's see

Re[4]: PGP auto-signing with pgp dll definitely broken with beta 9

2003-06-06 Thread Cees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo Cees, Op een vrijdag 6 juni 2003 om 14:56:13 schreef jij over Re[4]: PGP auto-signing with pgp dll definitely broken with beta 9: AM Let's see if the integrated pgp6 support works. AM Neither works, so this is a manual signature. C Testing

1.63 Beta/9

2003-06-06 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Stefan, Friday, June 6, 2003, 11:29:08 AM, you wrote: ST What other things should be fixed ASAP ? I want to start new series ST of core changes, so I want to be sure this version is OK for you... Beta 9 still appends the text from a random Inbox-message to a predefined file, instead

Re: 1.63 Beta/9

2003-06-06 Thread Gene Gough
5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/9 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html

1.63 Beta/9

2003-06-06 Thread Ron Secord
create a new message using the Favorites pop up menu and there is a QT involved, the name will not be put into the To field. All that shows up is This doesn't happen in beta 7 either. -- Regards, Ron Secord Flying with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/9 Windows 2000 Pro 2195 Service Pack 2

Re: 1.63 Beta/9

2003-06-06 Thread John Thomas
the quoted text. If you take those out, it should work fine. -- Best regards, John Thomas Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current beta is 1.63b8 | Using TBBETA information: http

Re[2]: PGP auto-signing with pgp dll definitely broken with beta 9

2003-06-06 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Allie, AM Rather than hit CTRL-Shif-S to sign, I just use the macro %signcomplete AM or use the menu choice to sign when sending. Do you mean - the macro does not work? It works here... -- Cheers, Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...Learn from your parents

Re: 1.63 Beta/9

2003-06-06 Thread Allie Martin
Carsten Thönges, [CT] wrote: CT Here is the Quick Template bq that works on a v1.63 beta 9. I think CT the new variables are extremely cool. They make things a lot easier. Thanks. Now, except for some PGP problems, I'm sitting pretty here on beta 9. :) -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator

Re: PGP auto-signing with pgp dll definitely broken with beta 9

2003-06-06 Thread Allie Martin
Stefan Tanurkov, [ST] wrote: ST Do you mean - the macro does not work? It works here... If I sign with the integrated PGP support enabled, my signature always verifies as bad. I don't know why. If I sign using the PGP plugin dll and the %signcomplete macro or 'sign when complete' menu option,

%Subject is Still Broken [Beta 9]

2003-06-06 Thread Bill McCarthy
Hello TB Beta List, I've read that some say Clean Subject macros are working. Others say they're not. Here's a simply demo. Create a AB reply macro on your own address. I created a one liner: %Subject=Reply: %OSubject I then replied to a message to myself with subject: Ref Test The reply

Re[2]: Bug Report (Beta/9): S/MIME-Certs disappeared [was: Certificates Missing]

2001-09-21 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck On 20 September 2001 at 17:41:01 +0100 (which was 17:41 where I live) Marck D Pearlstone graced us with these comments MDP So they are! And yet they still work! I can S/MIME sign without a MDP glitch. Its is a good sig to me. Using

Re: Bug Report (Beta/9): S/MIME-Certs disappeared [was: Certificates Missing]

2001-09-20 Thread Thomas F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gerry, On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 15:47:10 -0400 GMT (21/09/2001, 03:47 +0800 GMT), Gerry Doyon wrote: JS But your signature appears invalid... GD Not to me they don't!!! They are completely valid for me. Markc's and your signature appeaar valid

HTML: was 1.54 Beta/9

2001-09-19 Thread Manfred Ell
On 19-09-2001 at 14:48:39 (GMT +0300) (which was 12:48 where I live) Stefan Tanurkov wrote regarding the subject of 1.54 Beta/9 Using: The Bat! (v1.54 Beta/9) Hello Stefan, ST [-] Floating tables in HTML viewer should be viewed correctly now. ST [-] Other HTML viewer bugs Look how the attached

Downgradable? was: 1.54 Beta/9

2001-09-19 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, what's the current status of downgrade problems from a beta to a non-beta? Does this still result in setting losses? I would like test beta 9 without losing something should I need to go back to 1.53. Regards, Markus -- Using The Bat! 1.53d under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6

beta/9

2001-04-20 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello All! http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb152b09.rar [+] It now accepts the help in HTML-help format (the_bat.chm). [-] (bug of previous betas) - PGP encryption errors must not allow the message editor to close (and to send the message or store it in Outbox) when "Encrypt when

Re: beta/9

2001-04-20 Thread Brian Clark
Hi Maxim, @ 5:27:27 PM on 4/20/2001, Maxim Masiutin wrote: ... MM [-] When looking for a recipient's public key, the addresses weren't matched correctly. Lord have mercy, thank you. :) -- Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Architect, Designer, and Programmer PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8

Re: beta/9

2001-04-20 Thread Brian Clark
to find the right key if the key is listed as belonging to: Fred R. Example [EMAIL PROTECTED] And the message is addressed to: Freddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weeping, -- Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Architect, Designer, and Programmer PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8 [TB! 1.52 Beta/9, Windows

beta/9

2000-12-02 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello TBBETA! http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb148b09.rar [*] %ABnnnPPP macros now can have the default value if used in form %ABnnnPPP="value" [-] "Gender bug" in the address book [*] A few changes/fixes to the Mail Dispatcher [-] Bug with the list addressing when an entry

Re: beta/9

2000-12-02 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Saturday, December 02, 2000, Maxim Masiutin wrote: [+] "Mass Mailing" menu in the Address Book's "File" menu I can't find this menu item in AB :-( -- Bye Marek Mikus Using the best The Bat! 1.48 Beta/9 under the worst Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 Intel Celero

Re: beta/9

2000-12-02 Thread Kari Jakobi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Peter, On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, at 19:16:24 h [GMT +0100] you wrote this about "beta/9": MM [*] %ABnnnPPP macros now can have the default value if used in form %ABnnnPPP="value" PH GREAT! What does that mean? What defaul

Re: Beta 9

2000-12-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Markus, On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:10:29 +0100GMT (01/12/2000, 17:10 +0800GMT), Markus Raitl wrote: MR i´ve seen that you use a new beta version /9. When it will go public MR for us to use? ROTFLMAO I was waiting for this. I sat here by my computer after I saw Stef's mailer and his

Re[2]: Beta 9

2000-12-01 Thread Markus Raitl
Hello, On 1. Dezember 2000; 10:15:23, you wrote: TF The answer is: the beta will be available as soon as Stef announces it TF on this list. Hopefull, it will be announced after he has uploaded it, TF not when he has started uploading it, but hey, it can't be long from TF now, can it? :-) i

Re: Beta 9

2000-12-01 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Markus, MR i´ve seen that you use a new beta version /9. When it will go public MR for us to use? Soon. Please be patient :-) -- Regards, Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...IBM: Its Being Mended --

Re: Beta/9

2000-07-18 Thread Tony Boom
:-) -- _ Best regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony. Using The Bat! 1.45 Beta/9 Windows 98 4.10 Build A Request PGP key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPKeyRequest S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re[2]: Beta/9

2000-07-17 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Monday, July 17, 2000 at 4:24 PM or thereabouts, Tony Boom wrote the following about Beta/9: -- [snip] --8 Tony With that done Open TB and open AccountProperties and edit your Tony vCard. Choose the Certfificates tab and import the pfx file from Tony the export you made. Okay

Re: Beta/9

2000-07-17 Thread Tony Boom
the Valid signature symbol without PGP signature in the email ?? It's OK, I cracked it! -- _ Best regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony. Using The Bat! 1.45 Beta/9 Windows 98 4.10 Build A Request PGP

Re: 1.42 Beta/9 is now available

2000-03-30 Thread Allie Martin
one was opened. I'm not using any explorer enhancing software either. -- © Allie .. Using TB! v1.42 Beta/9 Win2k Pro --- ** Runtime Error 6D at 417A:32CF: Incompetent User. ** -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http

The Bat! - bug report // group-handle list doesn't work correctly anymore in beta/9

2000-03-30 Thread Roel
Hello The Bat! developers, I'm using The Bat! Version 1.42 Beta/9 Serial Number UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A and would like to report a bug The bug description: when i send out a message to any group (addresses have always worked with 141

Re: 1.36 beta/9

1999-10-02 Thread George M. Menegakis
Saturday, October 02, 1999, 5:34:03 PM, Max Masyutin wrote: what's new in Beta/9 (comparing to 1.35) [!] New images designed by TV4 STUDIOS Ltd. To be honest I prefair the old ones... Is there any chance to get them back ? For example, folder icons are... too yellow, not easy

Re: 1.36 beta/9

1999-10-02 Thread Leif Gregory
Max, On Saturday, October 02, 1999, at 23:34 you wrote: MMwhat's new in Beta/9 (comparing to 1.35) MM [!] New images designed by TV4 STUDIOS Ltd. One word. BEAUTIFUL!!! A very appreciated update to the interface. MM [!] Perl-compatible Regular Expressions string matching when searching