Hello Thomas Fernandez & everyone else,
on 29-Okt-2005 at 14:30 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote:
>>> A very p*ssed
TB>> That means your drunk. You need to put an "off" after it... Pis*ed off
TB>> :)
> Might that be a difference between AE and BE?
Indeed - at least according to dict.leo.org ...int
Hello Tony,
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:42:27 +0100 GMT (29/10/2005, 01:42 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
>> A very p*ssed
TB> That means your drunk. You need to put an "off" after it... Pis*ed
TB> off :)
Might that be a difference between AE and BE?
Cookidence!
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
There are a l
On Friday, October 28, 2005, 22:35:56, MAU wrote:
> See from 9Val at 17:52:30
> (where I live). 1 hour, 17 minutes and 27 seconds before your message at
> 19:09:57 (also where I live)
According to headers, Robert's message was sent 40 minutes before 9Val's.
--
< Jernej Simoncic ><><><><>< http
Hello Robert,
> I can't believe it. No announcement in this group, nothing.
See from 9Val at 17:52:30
(where I live). 1 hour, 17 minutes and 27 seconds before your message at
19:09:57 (also where I live)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.62.05 on Windows
Hello Martin,
Friday, October 28, 2005, 9:46:07 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Tony!
>>> A very p*ssed
>> That means your drunk. You need to put an "off" after it... Pis*ed
>> off :)
> "Drunk" is also ok because I must be drunk spending time here with beta
> testing...
LOL :)
--
Best regards,
Vilius
Hello Richard,
Friday, October 28, 2005, 9:46:22 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Vilius,
> Friday, October 28, 2005, 1:52:04 PM, you wrote:
>>> After all, there weren't many problems with 3.6201 beta.
VŠ>> You must be kiddin', right?
> Compared to 3.6203?
Compared to the 3.62.03 it has only one bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Oct 2005, at 20:18, Mary Bull wrote:
> Try an e-mail to this address:
You beat me to it.
- --
Tony Boom
PGP http://www.theboomclan.com/tbc.asc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.2 (Build 2425)
Comment: T.B.C. Imac G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Oct 2005, at 20:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You must be new here.
Best answer I've seen yet :)
- --
Tony Boom
PGP http://www.theboomclan.com/tbc.asc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.2 (Build 2425)
Comment: T.B.C
On 28 Oct 2005, at 20:09, Francis Segond wrote:
Where can I sign in? :-)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tbot/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subj
Bonjour Mary,
MB> Try
MB> Or click
Done!
Thank you
--
FRANCIS J. SEGOND
Webpage: http://faustroll.net, http://butsu.org
PGP-Key: http://www.segond.de/pubkey/segond.asc
Current beta is 3.62.03 | 'Using
Hello Francis!
On Friday, October 28, 2005, 2:09 PM, you wrote:
> Where can I sign in? :-)
Try an e-mail to this address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or click on the tbudl info link at the bottom of every post to a TB!
list, scroll way down, and click on the button for subscribing to
TBOT.
--
Best reg
A Bat-fellow, Robert van der Hulst,
wrote on Friday, 28th October 2005 at 19:09:57 (GMT +0200),
which was ditto in Bratislava --
> I have asked for comments, but everybody at RitLabs plays deaf.
> I really can't believe you released this.
You must be new here.
--
Yours,
Alex. of Slovakia
www.av
Bonjour Tony,
TB> Best place is TBOT... Talk about anything you want as long as it's
TB> not The Bat! That way you don't get too depressed.
Where can I sign in? :-)
--
FRANCIS J. SEGOND
Webpage: http://faustroll.net, http://butsu.org
PGP-Key: http://www.segond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Oct 2005, at 19:59, Mike Rourke wrote:
> Not anymore, I'm done...
Best place is TBOT... Talk about anything you want as long as it's
not The Bat! That way you don't get too depressed.
- --
Tony Boom
PGP http://www.theboomclan.com/tbc.as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Oct 2005, at 19:51, Francis Segond wrote:
> (I know that they don't care for one licence,
> but I might not be alone) ;-)
They don't care for any license once they've had your money.
- --
Tony Boom
PGP http://www.theboomclan.com/tbc.asc
Dimitry Andric wrote:
I've migrated to Thunderbird for some time now. Even the so-called
"unstable" nightly builds are far more stable than The Bat has ever
been. In some cases, The Bat is a bit faster, in other cases
Thunderbird is.
I find the same here. I always am on the latest nightly, j
Bonjour Tony,
>> A very p*ssed
TB> That means your drunk. You need to put an "off" after it... Pis*ed
TB> off :)
True! I'm titally possed off too!
--
FRANCIS J. SEGOND
Webpage: http://faustroll.net, http://butsu.org
PGP-Key: http://www.segond.de/pubkey/segond
Bonjour Martin,
MS> They deal with us like you deal with cattle. Thank you Ritlabs. I can
MS> remember several releases where I as a betatester was very surprised when I
MS> saw the final on the website a couple of days after the release. This is no
MS> good behaviour! The people here are volunte
Hello Tony,
TB> Do you really think they give a damn?. As long as Joe Public keep
TB> paying them money for crap do you really think they give a damn
TB> about any of us?
What makes you think that TB even has a significant amount people
buying the product? I so rarely even see it mentioned anywher
Hello Vilius,
Friday, October 28, 2005, 1:52:04 PM, you wrote:
>> After all, there weren't many problems with 3.6201 beta.
VŠ> You must be kiddin', right?
Compared to 3.6203?
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
---
Using The Bat!
Hi Tony!
>> A very p*ssed
> That means your drunk. You need to put an "off" after it... Pis*ed
> off :)
"Drunk" is also ok because I must be drunk spending time here with beta
testing...
Regards,
Martin
--
The Bat! v3.62.05 powered by Windows 2003 5.2 Build 3790 Service Pack 1
ConCarne cooks
On 28 Oct 2005, at 19:01, Martin Sebald wrote:
A very p*ssed
That means your drunk. You need to put an "off" after it... Pis*ed
off :)
--
Tony Boom
PGP http://www.theboomclan.com/tbc.asc
Current beta is 3.62.03 | 'Using TBBETA
On 28 Oct 2005, at 19:00, Vilius Šumskas wrote:
A week may sound like a vacation for RIT guys. Let's aim for three
months :).
Two possible scenarios.
One... You all stay on the list, post as normal and just as always
you'll be totally ignored by any RL employee.
Two... You all stop posti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Oct 2005, at 18:53, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> Oh, I'll do this, no kidding!
They've already had your money so it's pretty damn certain and
blatantly obvious they don't give a sh*t what you or any of the rest
of us do!
They'll soon get th
On 28 Oct 2005, at 18:37, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Lets go on strike. Don't post anything for one week on any of the
TB lists.
Do you really think they give a damn?. As long as Joe Public keep
paying them money for crap do you really think they give a damn about
any of us?
--
Tony
Robert van der Hulst wrote:
> I am seriously considering moving to a new email client.
I've migrated to Thunderbird for some time now. Even the so-called
"unstable" nightly builds are far more stable than The Bat has ever
been. In some cases, The Bat is a bit faster, in other cases
Thunderbird i
Hi all!
> It has happened again...
> Build 3.62 has been released to the public today, with new features and
> new bugs. I can't believe it. No announcement in this group, nothing.
Always the same. I cannot believe this, too! :-(
They deal with us like you deal with cattle. Thank you Ritlabs. I
Hello Alexander,
Friday, October 28, 2005, 8:37:38 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Robert van der Hulst & everyone else,
> on 28-Okt-2005 at 19:09 you (Robert van der Hulst) wrote:
>> I really can't believe you released this.
> Lets go on strike. Don't post anything for one week on any of the TB lists.
Hello Francis Segond,
28-Okt-2005 19:41, you wrote:
ASK>> Lets go on strike. Don't post anything for one week on any of the TB
ASK>> lists.
> Quite agree! TB-customers of all countries, unite!
Oh, I'll do this, no kidding!
:)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 2381539
Hello Richard,
Friday, October 28, 2005, 8:36:42 PM, you wrote:
> After all, there weren't many problems with 3.6201 beta.
You must be kiddin', right?
--
Best regards,
Vilius
Current beta is 3.62.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
ht
Hello.
Here's what Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed on
Friday, October 28, 2005 at 10:36:42 AM:
> After all, there weren't many problems with 3.6201 beta. No one saw
> a 3.6202 beta. Just about everyone had problems with AV and exiting
> errors with the 3.6203 beta. And then no one asked us
Bonjour Alexander,
ASK> Lets go on strike. Don't post anything for one week on any of the TB
lists.
Quite agree! TB-customers of all countries, unite!
--
FRANCIS J. SEGOND
Webpage: http://faustroll.net, http://butsu.org
PGP-Key: http://www.segond.de/pubkey/seg
Hello Robert van der Hulst & everyone else,
on 28-Okt-2005 at 19:09 you (Robert van der Hulst) wrote:
> I really can't believe you released this.
Lets go on strike. Don't post anything for one week on any of the TB lists.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
S
On 10/28/05, Robert van der Hulst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It has happened again...Build 3.62 has been released to the public today, with new features and newbugs. I can't believe it. No announcement in this group, nothing.Rather unbelievable . . . but it is Friday and they must have wanted to fi
It has happened again...
Build 3.62 has been released to the public today, with new features and new
bugs. I can't believe it. No announcement in this group, nothing.
My issue of Tb corrupting attachments (introduced during the current beta
cycle) is still open. I have asked for comments, but ev
35 matches
Mail list logo