Re: Doesn't stop flapping - Re: 4.0.24.11
Hello Max, I used Reply to all for this message. My name was on the TO field, yours in the CC, both with the TBBETA address. I ctrl-X'ed your name (with the TBBETA address) from the CC field and crtl-V'ed into the TO field, it showed your name with the TBBETA address as desired. The moment I click into the body, the TO field is changed as above. That happened three times in in row. Can anybody confirm? I've never seen this odd behaviour before. On Mon, 26 May 2008 21:31:21 +0700 GMT (26/05/2008, 21:31 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF Hello Maxim, TF On Sat, 17 May 2008 00:14:31 +0300 GMT (17/05/2008, 04:14 +0700 GMT), TF Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM The Bat! 4.0.24.11 is available at TF I just created a new account. The taskbar icon started flapping when TF the test mail was sent to the Outbox. That's not right. The flapping TF indicates new unread messages that have arrived. TF Flapping stopped when the message was sent. TF It started again when the BCC copy was received. Normal. TF But the flapping didn't stop when the mail was read! Closing and TF reopening TB! helped. TF This only happens with the newly-created account under beta 11, not TF with the old and established accounts. Voyager 4.0.18.4 also has a flapping problem with a new account. I created the account and downloaded the messages that had already arrived and marked all as read. The flapping (well, compass moving) didn't stop. Closing and reopening Voyager helped. I think the flapping code has a problem with newly created accounts. TF Comfirmations? Anybody, please create a new account with a free provider, send some messages to it, create the account in TB! and Voyager, download and mark the messages as read, or put a message in the Outbox and see what happens when it gets send. If I get a confirmation, I will create a bug report. It's not that serious, as the behaviour normalises once TB! is closed and reopened, but still. -- Cheers, Thomas. 19. The quickest way to double your money is to fold it in half and put it back in your pocket. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.24.11 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.24.16 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Doesn't stop flapping - Re: 4.0.24.11
Dear Thomas, @1-Jun-2008, 00:17 +0700 (31-May 18:17 here) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Thomas: ... snip TF field, it showed your name with the TBBETA address as desired. The TF moment I click into the body, the TO field is changed as above. That TF happened three times in in row. TF Can anybody confirm? I've never seen this odd behaviour before. I will confirm but fully describe it as follows: When you click into the *unchanged* body of a message, the source template is re-evaluated. If that template affects any of the address fields, these are re-evaluated too. If you edit the body (even slightly) before making any changes to the addressing, any address changes will stick. It is by design, I believe, but the design does feel uncomfortable to me. ... snip -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v4.0.24.16 on Windows Vista 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 ' pgpiUaZrUvG3m.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.0.24.16 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Weird recipeint behaviour (was: Doesn't stop flapping - Re: 4.0.24.11)
Hello Marck, On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:03 +0100 GMT (01/06/2008, 00:32 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: TF Can anybody confirm? I've never seen this odd behaviour before. MDP I will confirm but fully describe it as follows: MDP When you click into the *unchanged* body of a message, the source MDP template is re-evaluated. If that template affects any of the address MDP fields, these are re-evaluated too. Confirmed. MDP If you edit the body (even slightly) before making any changes to the MDP addressing, any address changes will stick. Confirmed. MDP It is by design, I believe, but the design does feel uncomfortable to me. Confirmed. Since it is apparently by design, would the request to change have to be a wishhlist entry rather than a bug report? Wishlist entries take longer to get attention. Or should we wait for Ritlabs to confirm whether this is a bug or WAD? -- Cheers, Thomas. 14. Why do 'overlook and 'oversee' mean opposite things? http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.24.11 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.24.16 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
