Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread 9Val
Hi MAU, M Can anyone confirm? Did I miss some announcement about this? Yes, now they are included as resources in exe file, but there was no announcement about it. -- 9Val

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello 9Val, Yes, now they are included as resources in exe file I must use 'batskin.INI' and 'batskin.XML' to manage the Icons from outside glyph. Otherwise I have a mix from the internal and external glyph. Will this be changed in the final version? -- best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread Tony Boom
Hello MAU, A reminder of what MAU on TBBETA typed on: 27 April 2005 at 00:18:56 GMT +0200 M Can anyone confirm? Did I miss some announcement about this? Confirmed, and I don't remember seeing anything about it. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.0.9.20 Return Windows XP Home SP2 Pentium ,

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread 9Val
Hi Miroslav, MF I must use 'batskin.INI' and 'batskin.XML' to manage the Icons from MF outside glyph. Otherwise I have a mix from the internal and external MF glyph. MF Will this be changed in the final version? Yes, Robo currently working on it --

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello 9Val, M Can anyone confirm? Did I miss some announcement about this? Yes, now they are included as resources in exe file, but there was no announcement about it. OK, thank you for confirming. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.9.20 Return on

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello Miroslav, I must use 'batskin.INI' and 'batskin.XML' to manage the Icons from outside glyph. Otherwise I have a mix from the internal and external glyph. Could you please explain how you use 'batskin.INI' and 'batskin.XML'? I'm still using my good old glyphs.bmp. -- Best regards,

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello 9Val, MF Will this be changed in the final version? Yes, Robo currently working on it Will it be possible to somehow customise some of the icons like folder icons for the folder tree (my main problem because of the different shades of blue)? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello MAU, Could you please explain how you use 'batskin.INI' and 'batskin.XML'? I'm still using my good old glyphs.bmp. there is a documentation for the Batskin.ini: › http://bat-mail.de.vu/batskin_ini.html There isn't any official documentation for the XML file at the moment, but it's

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread 9Val
Hi Miroslav, MF There isn't any official documentation for the XML file at the moment, MF but it's similar to the INI file. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HTH -- 9Val Current

Re[2]: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread Ivan
Hello, Miroslav! There isn't any official documentation for the XML file at the moment, but it's similar to the INI file. Yea. is a similar to that one. You may use original as template. I simply extract new batskin.xml from new beta's resources. There is little undocumented feature in xml.

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello Miroslav, Could you please explain how you use 'batskin.INI' and 'batskin.XML'? I'm still using my good old glyphs.bmp. there is a documentation for the Batskin.ini: › http://bat-mail.de.vu/batskin_ini.html Thanks, I'll take a look. There isn't any official documentation for the

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello 9Val, MF There isn't any official documentation for the XML file at the moment, MF but it's similar to the INI file. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HTH Yes, I had seen that message. But see my reply to Miroslav. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.9.20

PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-27 Thread MAU
Hello all, Sorry if I have missed something with the previous betas but doing some testing I just realised that, at least 3.0.9.20 does not need the new_icons.png file or any of the other 2 PNGs. I start TB without those files being in the installation directory and TB does not complain and, as

Re: PNG files not needed for 3.0.9.20?

2005-04-27 Thread Boris Anders
Hello MAU, Mau wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]): Can anyone confirm? confirmed - I build up a new beta basis from my 3.01 RC6 and had therefor no *.png file in TheBat! folder - after starting new version I still have no one :-). -- Regards, Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de