Re: Group by date

2007-08-20 Thread Fredrik Bergström
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:19:41 +0200 GMT, Fredrik wrote: I have the view mode configured to sort on Created, Thread by Recipient and Group by date. snip Ah, sorry. I just reloaded the non beta The Bat! version and noticed the problem there as well. Should I post the question the

Re: Group by date

2007-08-20 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Fredrik, On 20-08-2007 11:19, you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Any ideas? Is this a known problem? I complained about this a long time ago (https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6229) but nothing has happened... -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat

Re: Group by date..

2005-03-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Graham, On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:05:23 +GMT (18-3-2005, 11:05 +0100, where I live), you wrote: FG I've not noticed this before... View threads by.. group by date. For FG me I get Today, Yesterday, and This year more than 3 months ago. FG Cool - but a few in-between date groups

RE: Group by date..

2005-03-18 Thread Foster, Graham
You are right... The heading I provided were from the TB BETA discussion list. I think we have a bug with all these signed messages dates?. ;-) Other folders produce OK results -- Graham -- Notice: This e-mail

Re: Group by date..

2005-03-18 Thread Raymund Tump
Hello Graham, that may be an interesting feature, but I think the topnode should be bold, as that means there are unread mails in there. -- Regards, Raymund Current beta is 3.0.9.7 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: Group by date..

2005-03-18 Thread Foster, Graham
Hello Raymund that may be an interesting feature, but I think the topnode should be bold, as that means there are unread mails in there. Top node IS bold here at least. -- regards, Graham Using The Bat! 3.0.9.7 Return (pre-beta) assisted by Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.2 under Windows

Re: Group by date..

2005-03-18 Thread Raymund Tump
Hello Graham, that may be an interesting feature, but I think the topnode should be bold, as that means there are unread mails in there. Top node IS bold here at least. My fault, it should have been ...shouldn't be bold, as that means -- Regards, Raymund