Tony Boom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Or maybe display colour depth? Even the image he sent to the list looks
fine to me and my colour is set to 32bit.
I'm also using the 32Bit colour settings,
so that's not it
--
Best regards,
Kian Andersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://neksus.dk |
Tony Boom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello Kian,
A reminder of what Kian Andersen on TBBETA typed on:
19 April 2005 at 21:42:57 GMT +0200
KA If it is that can't be helped,
KA I am using a Laptop with official drivers!
Are they the latest official drivers?
The latest working drivers! I
Het was op woensdag 20 april 2005 om 9:52 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'3.0.9.17 signed message icon looks bad' :
Hallo Tony,
C problems with your videocard maybe?
TB Or maybe display colour depth? Even the image he sent to the list looks
TB fine to me and my colour is set to 32bit.
Tony Boom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello Kian,
A reminder of what Kian Andersen on TBBETA typed on:
20 April 2005 at 09:57:45 GMT +0200
KA I'm also using the 32Bit colour settings,
KA so that's not it
Just a thought that was all.
Want me to send my icon file to try? Don't think
Cees ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
not confirmed; icons look just okay overhere.
I am using WindowBlinds to skin Windows!
This might have something to do with it!
The skin is Oxidized (costs money)
--
Best regards,
Kian Andersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://neksus.dk | http://paradiselost.dk |
Het was op dinsdag 19 april 2005 om 21:02 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'3.0.9.17 signed message icon looks bad' :
Hallo Kian,
KA I thought it might be my WindowBlinds skin,
KA but it is not, the attached image is using Windows Classic (95/98/2000 look)
KA And the white spots are still
6 matches
Mail list logo
