Re[3]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-28 Thread Vili
Hello Goncalo, I have 2 messages created with TB (messages I sent) simply stall the TB's backup procedure for every TB! released since version 3.51.8 (or 3.51.10). At least 3.51.8 was the last version where I was able to do a full backup of my message base without issues. the

Re[4]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-27 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I may try to export and import them into my laptop installation. I'll let you know about the results. What do you suggest if those messages are backuped correctly? I'm V I guess, he meant it literally. You're guessing... asking this because I'm

Re[5]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-27 Thread Vili
Hello Goncalo, asking this because I'm not the only one to have this problems, another user is experiencing the same. V Two experience it, many not... You must be under great stress lately. Maybe, but... I didn't mention MANY, I said I'm not the ONLY one having the problem

Re: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-27 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Goncalo Farias everyone else, on 24-Sep-2005 at 10:31 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote: I have 2 messages created with TB (messages I sent) simply stall the TB's backup procedure for every TB! released since version 3.51.8 (or 3.51.10). At least 3.51.8 was the last version where I was able

Re: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-27 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello ...in addition to my previous message... on 27-Sep-2005 at 18:31 you (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote: I can confirm that the backup stalls when store external attachments in message body is selected. PS: I don't store attachments externally, anyway, so this option shouldn't make any

Re[2]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-27 Thread Goncalo Farias
Hi Alexander, In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : ASK Hello Goncalo Farias everyone else, ASK on 24-Sep-2005 at 10:31 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote: I have 2 messages created with TB (messages I sent) simply stall the TB's backup procedure for every TB! released since version 3.51.8

Re: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-26 Thread 9Val
Hi Goncalo, GF I'm still awaiting for an answer from Maxim, since I sent him the GF offending messages. Hmm, I've tested your messages and they are backuped normally, so... Could you send them to anybody else for testing? --

Re[2]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-26 Thread Vili
Hello 9Val, GF I'm still awaiting for an answer from Maxim, since I sent him the GF offending messages. Hmm, I've tested your messages and they are backuped normally, so... Could you send them to anybody else for testing? In our dreams : We asked him, and we got this answer... It

Re[2]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-26 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : 9 Hi Goncalo, GF I'm still awaiting for an answer from Maxim, since I sent him the GF offending messages. 9 Hmm, I've tested your messages and they are backuped normally, 9 so... Could you send them to anybody else for testing? I may try to export

Re[6]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-26 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : In your dreams! :) V New Kill filter, if Sender: Goncalo, active. Case closed. You should try a SPA. I'm feeling tension in your emails... -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias 911, If you are reporting a murder, press 1. If your rep

Re[2]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-26 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : 9 Hi Goncalo, GF I'm still awaiting for an answer from Maxim, since I sent him the GF offending messages. 9 Hmm, I've tested your messages and they are backuped normally, so... 9 Could you send them to anybody else for testing? PS: Not all

Re[3]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-26 Thread Vili
Hello Goncalo, 9 Hmm, I've tested your messages and they are backuped normally, 9 so... Could you send them to anybody else for testing? I may try to export and import them into my laptop installation. I'll let you know about the results. What do you suggest if those messages are

Re[7]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-26 Thread Vili
Hello Goncalo, In your dreams! :) V New Kill filter, if Sender: Goncalo, active. Case closed. You should try a SPA. I'm feeling tension in your emails... :)) Taken. -- Vili The Bat 3.61.07 Echo (Beta) on Windows 98 4.10 A

Re[5]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-25 Thread Vili
Hello Goncalo, V If you want, send me the TBB and TBI files ZIPped in private, V describe the problem, and if I can reproduce your problem, I V promise, I will push this thing too. My intention is as yours: V kill the bugs. If it is there... In your dreams! :) New Kill filter,

BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-24 Thread Goncalo Farias
It very annoying to see everybody talking about AV in printing, high memory consumption, etc and neglecting something I've been complaining about for 3 or 4 beta released. I have 2 messages created with TB (messages I sent) simply stall the TB's backup procedure for every TB! released since

Re: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-24 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Goncalo, On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 09:31:00 +0100GMT (24-9-2005, 10:31 +0200, where I live), you wrote: GF It very annoying to see everybody talking about AV in printing, high GF memory consumption, etc and neglecting something I've been complaining GF about for 3 or 4 beta released. That's

Re[2]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-24 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : RO Hallo Goncalo, RO On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 09:31:00 +0100GMT (24-9-2005, 10:31 +0200, RO where I live), you wrote: GF It very annoying to see everybody talking about AV in printing, GF high memory consumption, etc and neglecting something I've been GF

Re: Re[2]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-24 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Goncalo Farias, RO That's because nobody can reproduce it, except for you. Well, that doesn't mean the bug is not there, does it? Not necessarily, it can be a local thing not really related to TB, but merely surfacing there. And I see people interested in things less

Re: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-24 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 2005-09-24 (11:01), you wrote: That's because nobody can reproduce it, except for you. You are wrong. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik -- pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! | /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl | /'.';

Re[4]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-24 Thread Goncalo Farias
Hi Roelof, In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : RO That's because nobody can reproduce it, except for you. Well, that doesn't mean the bug is not there, does it? RO Not necessarily, it can be a local thing not really related to TB, RO but merely surfacing there. How do you explain that TB

Re[2]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-24 Thread Goncalo Farias
Hi Krzysztof, In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : KK On 2005-09-24 (11:01), you wrote: That's because nobody can reproduce it, except for you. KK You are wrong. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] KK Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik Try to narrow it down to messages with attachments. To find the

Re[3]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-24 Thread Vili
Hello Goncalo, Well, that doesn't mean the bug is not there, does it? And I see people interested in things less important. Other people maybe too polite, my opinion is that you are selfish when you say it. AV at printing was REPRODUCIBLE, memory consumption is REPRODUCIBLE. If you

Re: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-24 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 2005-09-24 (16:50), you wrote: That wil narrow the offending message to a small group and you'll be able to determine which one is. Gonacalo :) I did it all the same way, as you. My conclusion is coherent with yours. Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik -- pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska

Re[4]: BUG IN BACKUP procedure: Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-24 Thread Goncalo Farias
Hi Villi, In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : V Hello Goncalo, Well, that doesn't mean the bug is not there, does it? And I see people interested in things less important. V Other people maybe too polite, my opinion is that you are selfish No comments. V when you say it. AV

Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-23 Thread Vili
Hello Volodymyr, Stay on message. If message include a attachment (picture, text etc), to view it - Shortcut Ctrl+Tab not working! Messages List Tab is OFF... 3.61.05 - all OK. More details, please. At me, Ctrl+Tab just working fine... -- Vili

Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-23 Thread Vili
Hello Dimitry, I will check the features, one question: the size of the EXE was ca. 10.5 MB at v.05. v.06 was 11.5 MB. Now we back to 10.4 MB. This last release was built by Maxim, the previous ones by 9Val. They obviously use different build systems and/or settings. Maybe 9Val builds his

Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-23 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Matt, Friday, September 23, 2005, 9:19:28 PM, you wrote: Auto-filtering has stopped working on one of my IMAP accounts with this beta. Anyone else? It has not stopped working, it just seems to work intermittently. I don't see any real pattern. Also have pauses when selecting

Re[2]: 3.61.07

2005-09-23 Thread Vili
Hello Vladimir, MM 3.61.07 is available at MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb36107.rar Cannot download - connection failed. I'm connected to Internet via LAN. Working for me, just tried now. -- Vili The Bat 3.61.07 Echo (Beta) on Windows 98 4.10 A