Hi Clive,
--On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 6:48 PM +0100 you wrote in part:
Given Mulberry is now gone, what other program could be used as a
comparator for IMAP and the Bat?
Why would you want that? The latest version of Mulberry was released two
weeks ago and, unless IMAP standards change, it
--On 11/10/2005 13:41 -0400 Ethan wrote:
Given Mulberry is now gone, what other program could be used as a
comparator for IMAP and the Bat?
Why would you want that? The latest version of Mulberry was released two
weeks ago and, unless IMAP standards change, it will continue to function
as exp
Hello Curtis,
Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 10:15:18 AM, you wrote:
> When I start up Mulberry
Given Mulberry is now gone, what other program could be used as a
comparator for IMAP and the Bat?
Jerry
--
Ethan J. Mings
Principal,
Curren
Clive,
>> Mulberry's speed comes from efficiency. You do far more with much less
>> transfer of data. TB! is doing too much in the background and requires
>> too much data transfer to be productive
> I'd buy that. It's the difference in philosophy between a POP and IMAP
> developed client, I su
4 matches
Mail list logo