Re[2]: Encrypting mail and national law

2004-11-14 Thread Dennis Hays
Batters: On Sunday, November 14, 2004, at 2:53:08 AM, Avi Yashar jumped on the stage, took a mike and sang: They gave the broken lock back to me with a note attached saying that they had done it and that they were not liable for the damage. That is highly odd. Had the lock been a valuable

Re[2]: Encrypting mail and national law

2004-11-14 Thread Dennis Hays
Batters: Dennis, in response to your screech of dismay, I was a visitor to the U.S. How could I be expected to know what type of locks to buy... or that I need to buy a special type of lock? And this happened almost two years ago. Perhaps those special TSA locks were not introduced back

Re[2]: Encrypting mail and national law

2004-11-14 Thread Ethan J. Mings
Sunday, November 14, 2004, 1:11:29 PM, you wrote: Dennis, in response to your screech of dismay, I was a visitor to the U.S. How could I be expected to know what type of locks to buy... or that I need to buy a special type of lock? And this happened almost two years ago. Perhaps those

Re[2]: Encrypting mail and national law

2004-11-13 Thread rmorris
Hello Avi, Saturday, November 13, 2004, 7:53:08 PM, you wrote: AY On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 14:18:36 -0600, hggdh wrote: Privacy does not really exist in the US. There is a lot of hot air vented around the idea, but no real privacy -- it's bad for business. AY Though it seems to be totally OT

Re[2]: Encrypting mail and national law

2004-11-12 Thread Gonalo Farias
MDP Dear Tony, MDP @12-Nov-2004, 22:08 Tony Boom [TB] in MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Dierk: DH had it already implemented. Or the US. TB It's been so for a long while. MDP Yes - for encrypted data of any kind. Should the government wish to MDP read your encrypted data, they may indeed