6/15/2012 8:24 PM
Hi Thomas,
On 6/15/2012 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF For actaul working, POP is best.
Yup!
- --
Paul
The Bat! v.4.2.44.2 on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7601
No IMAP No OTFE
Current beta is 5.1.6.4 | 'Using TBBETA'
5/2/2012 3:53 PM
Hi RS,
On 5/2/2012 RS (FEDARA) wrote:
RF Last thing is that I do not have much trust in IMAP and leaving your
RF data on some server ; even big companies lost customers data due to
RF mistakes - you can call me old fashioned here but if it's lost I can
RF only blame
5/1/2012 11:36 AM
Hi Tony,
On 5/1/2012 Tony Hoare wrote:
IMO IMAP is the only driving force for v5. IMAP is not a part of my
future for reasons of security that cannot be overcome with IMAP.
TH What security issues do you see in IMAP?
The message base is not local.
- --
Paul
The Bat!
5/1/2012 11:56 AM
Hi Raymund,
On 5/1/2012 Raymund Tump wrote:
RT Hi Paul,
TH What security issues do you see in IMAP?
The message base is not local.
RT That is a security issue only if you think your mails aren't save as
RT long as they are on a server. This is also true for POP3 as
5/1/2012 11:56 AM
Hi Rick,
On 5/1/2012 Rick wrote:
The message base is not local.
R Is that not the nature of the beast? If you want security, us POP
Yup!
- --
Paul
The Bat! v.4.2.44.2 on Windows 7 Pro 64 bit 6.1.7601
No IMAP No OTFE
5/1/2012 9:41 PM
Hi Vilius,
On 5/1/2012 Vilius Šumskas wrote:
VŠ If an attacker is in possesion of mail server it doesn't matter if
VŠ it's IMAP or POP. He will still be able to read your new email. IMAP
VŠ is just a protocol to get email from the server. It is no more or less
VŠ secure
5/1/2012 9:43 PM
Hi Raymund,
On 5/1/2012 Raymund Tump wrote:
RT I can't see what's more to it.
RT Any mail send can be read by someone along the way as long as it is
RT not encrypted. If it is at rest at a server it might be easier to
RT access for an attacker.
RT if your mail is that
4/30/2012 8:21 AM
Hi Rick,
On 4/29/2012 Rick wrote:
R Filters work well
R Delayed sending is AWESOME
R Less bugs
R Drag and drop images in HTML emails
R I could go on - what specifically concerns you?
Filters in V4 work perfectly for me.
After 14 years of use the interface changes do nothing
4/29/2012 10:19 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 4/29/2012 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF Over 100 filters though, that's why I am reluctant: If it ain't broke,
TF don't fix it.
Precisely!
TF Maybe it's time for a little prep-talk again. In a nut-shell, why
TF should I (POP-user) upgrade to v5? I am not only
9 matches
Mail list logo
