Hello Curtis,
A reminder of what Curtis typed on:
Sunday, October 02, 2005 at 06:49:37 GMT -0500
C It's now running a full 24 hours uninterrupted and IMAP remains well
C behaved.
C mem usage 24 MB
C Peak mem usage 28MB
C VM usage 35MB
Are you referring here to TB! or Mulberry?
--
Best
Hello Curtis,
A reminder of what Curtis typed on:
Sunday, October 02, 2005 at 08:25:56 GMT -0500
Are you referring here to TB! or Mulberry?
C TB! of course. :)
The problems I still have with IMAP are:
1) Filtering still only works on the first level. In other words if I
have a filter that
Hello Curtis,
A reminder of what Curtis typed on:
Sunday, October 02, 2005 at 09:42:32 GMT -0500
C This problem is easily avoided by avoiding a double action as you do.
C For instance, for TBBETA:
C Filter one - Header contains 'reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
C AND Header does not
Hi Curtis,
Am Sunday, October 2, 2005, 4:02:19 AM, schriebst du:
I've been running v3.61.09 beta all day without interruption. Things
have been quite fine. No hiccups at all really. The main good point is
that I haven't had to restart because the connection has flaked out on
me.
Connection
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
DAC On Sunday, October 2, 2005, 8:45:02 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
3) The counts that show are odd and inconsistent. Sometimes the
[..]
Shouldn't we be talking about the latest beta?
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
The eyes of wolves are flowers fertilized
Hello Clive,
This was my feeling until I returned from holiday this morning to find
that Cyrusoft and Mulberry have gone into receivership. No more
Mulberry by the look of it. Details here: http://www.cyrusoft.com
How the heck a small, one-product software company can go bankrupt? I
mean,
Hello Curtis,
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 9:02:19 PM, you wrote:
On 9/24/2005 at 2:55:32 PM [GMT -0500], Kevin Amazon wrote:
BTW, IMAP IS NOT hard stuff. The RFC is clear and concise and that is
the reason clients such as Thunderbird and Mulberry (and even Outlook)
are pretty flawless at
Hello Keith,
Sunday, September 25, 2005, 10:09:15 PM, you wrote:
KR Unfortunately, following the advice to downgrade to 3.60.1 didn't
KR help me. It appears as though one of the later betas may have
KR made some kind of a configuration change that resulted in this
KR behavior.
I wonder if
Hello Curtis,
Monday, September 26, 2005, 7:47:54 AM, you wrote:
C Using a FastMail account. Plain IMAP from work and IMAPs from home.
I am also using Fastmail and also have a Smarter Mail account through
Gearhost to compare.
C I don't really note any difference in IMAP of recently. Things
C
Hello Clive,
A reminder of what Clive Taylor typed on:
Saturday, September 24, 2005 at 08:39:18 GMT +0100
CT It's a shame, really. There was just one version (3.60.1) which
CT performed perfectly here under IMAP, all the others have been dogs for
CT me!
I knew that one of the past versions
Hello Greg,
A reminder of what Greg Strong typed on:
Saturday, September 24, 2005 at 09:56:04 GMT -0500
GS Hello Stuart,
GS On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:20:16 -0500 GMT(9/24/2005, 7:20 AM -0500 GMT),
GS per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stuart Cuddy wrote:
I think I will try to download 3.60.1 if it is
11 matches
Mail list logo
