Re[2]: winmail.dat

Hello all, Monday, March 19, 2012, Alto Speckhardt wrote: yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any body or attachment, they were decoded from TS-TNEF. Oh yes, I forgot: The message body was empty, no text at all. So the winmail.dat was in fact not decoded

Re[2]: winmail.dat

Hello all, Monday, March 19, 2012, Dierk Haasis wrote: yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any body or attachment, they were decoded from TS-TNEF. In that case I sit enlightened. but I was wrong, it was implemented in 4.0 already :-) -- Bye Marek Mikus

Re[2]: winmail.dat ? what the heck is that?

Hi Pixie, P Uh, that brings to mind the numerous MS Outlook .PST import P features.. For example the .PST import from TB! This is not the case - TB! uses MAPI and automation to access Outlook's data (which also has problems) -- Regards, Stefan The only real difference between an oral and

Re[2]: winmail.dat ? what the heck is that?

Hello admins... M Outlook send weird things? And even if it does, how the heck can I pry M the darned thing open?? PC drag the winmail.dat to a program called fentun.exe , it will expand out PC any attachments.. ok, I can see the cut copy police out after me... I THOUGHT I trimmed that

Re[2]: Winmail.dat

Hello Syafril, Wednesday, November 24, 1999, 12:49:08 PM GMT+0800, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: SH Ouh.. all of my browser installed in my machine give up to read SH enriched attachment (Netscape 4.7, Internet Explorer 5.01, Opera SH 3.60). SH Any other ideas ? TF I have Netscpae 4.7

Re[2]: Winmail.dat

Hello Syafril, Wednesday, November 24, 1999, 3:07:17 PM GMT+0800, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: SH It work ! :-D))) You just made my day (even though the solution is not from me, but I was starting to worry.) ;-) -- Best regards, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.38 Beta/3 under