lunes, 18 oct 2004 at 20:44, it seems you wrote: > But the necessity to declare the header first reduces the chance of "typos" > inside the templates [e.g. setheader("x-rouge",":rogue:")] and also most > likely reduces the appearance of messages with "nonsence headers". If the > user is forced to DEFINE what he wants to insert at another place, he at > least has to *think* ;-) a bit.
It's an opion thanks. I think we not need a confirmation for this, there are a lot more dangerous options in TB! than this, and the others don't have a declaration elsewhere. I think when people it's playing with filters or macros the should test they before sending any message. You could test the macros saving a blank message to the outbox and checking headers with F9. -- /\ / Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 / \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 1) / \/ e t \/ i c i o u s Plugins: BayesIt! 0.7.3 and miniRelayPlug 0.05.50 ........................ Last 24 hour Spam% it's 63% Moderator of Spanish TBUDL Spanish Translation Coordinator of The Bat! ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/