lunes, 18 oct 2004 at 20:44, it seems you wrote:

> But  the necessity to declare the header first reduces the chance of "typos"
> inside  the  templates  [e.g.  setheader("x-rouge",":rogue:")] and also most
> likely  reduces  the  appearance of messages with "nonsence headers". If the
> user  is  forced  to  DEFINE what he wants to insert at another place, he at
> least has to *think* ;-) a bit.

It's an opion thanks.
I  think  we  not  need  a confirmation for this, there are a lot more
dangerous  options  in  TB!  than  this,  and  the others don't have a
declaration elsewhere.

I  think  when  people  it's playing with filters or macros the should
test they before sending any message. You could test the macros saving
a blank message to the outbox and checking headers with F9.

-- 
  /\    /                     Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33
 /  \  /     \  /             Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 1)
/    \/ e t   \/ i c i o u s  Plugins: BayesIt! 0.7.3 and miniRelayPlug 0.05.50
   ........................   Last 24 hour Spam% it's 63%
Moderator of Spanish TBUDL    
Spanish Translation Coordinator of The Bat!






________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to