Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

2005-01-21 Thread Cees
Het was op vrijdag 21 januari 2005 om 23:41 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Update on the Status of Software' : Hallo Goncalo, GMM I don't think that moderators are demagogs. This is contradiction in terms, I was referring to the concern with those people paying their internet per byte

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

2005-01-20 Thread Cees
Het was op donderdag 20 januari 2005 om 17:46 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Update on the Status of Software' : Hallo Maxim, they tell us. It may be they don't give us an update until they actually release the next version. Whatever. I will give a little technical update. The

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

2005-01-20 Thread NetVicious
jueves, 20 ene 2005 at 17:46, it seems you wrote: I will give a little technical update. The batskin.ini, which was a temporary glyph definition file, will no longer be read, the new file which will persist will be batskin.xml; the format of the language file for the people who translate The

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

2005-01-20 Thread Goncalo Farias
N jueves, 20 ene 2005 at 08:26, it seems you wrote: As read below in my prior message. TB! doesn't focus on John Doe home users in the first way but advanced home users and semiprofessionalls. And they will use IMAP more and more often. N A lot of companies use at work an

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

2005-01-20 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/20/2005 9:41 PM Hi Goncalo, Gesh! Huge task.. don't know how you can manage that just by yourself. You're being demagog. No big deal with that. I already justify all the text and that really ONLY affects people that actually reply to the message. I believe this list existed before you

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

2005-01-19 Thread Dick H
Hello Goncalo, On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 20:47:22 GMT + (which was 21:47:22 where I live), Goncalo Farias wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of Update on the Status of Software: It doesn't crash because it looks like it was built with a borland compiler but

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

2005-01-18 Thread Ethan J. Mings
Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 4:00:15 AM, you wrote: I made the comment because the same person has asked the same question on a regular basis, that's all. Yes, we are all waiting for a newer version but I seem to remember (I've deleted the original) that the developers said it was being put

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

2005-01-18 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Goncalo, On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GF Is that so, uh? I guess you need to cool down a little. What do you GF think? Oh ye gods. Another one crawls out from under the stones to start mouthing off. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.0.2.10 SpamPal | Windows

Re[3]: Update on the Status of Software

2005-01-18 Thread Tim Casten
Hello Goncalo, Tuesday, January 18, 2005, 4:41:14 PM, you wrote: We need bugfixes, that's what we need. I agree v3 has been nothing but problems on my end. -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]