Hello Rick,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:47:45 -0500 GMT (17/Dec/10, 8:47 AM +0700 GMT),
Rick wrote:
you download the new rogues.zip and extract it in your images folder
I'm stuck on this step. The download does not seem to be working.
You can not download?
Hello Rick,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:47:45 -0500 GMT (17/Dec/10, 8:47 AM +0700 GMT),
Rick wrote:
you download the new rogues.zip and extract it in your images folder
I'm stuck on this step. The download does not seem to be working.
You can not download?
12/17/2010 4:50 PM
Hi Rick,
On 12/17/2010 Rick wrote:
Then I would think the problem is with your DNS server. I just
downloaded the file by clicking on the link above.
R It is working now - din't blame MY dns server when others are
R having the same trouble - and on a SITE that has a track
Hello Rick,
Friday, December 17, 2010, 3:35:54 PM, you wrote:
It is working now - din't blame MY dns server when others are having the same
trouble - and on a SITE that has a track record of trouble :)
Yes it is working now.
--
Best regards,
Stuart
Hi,
the pcwize Rogues Site is working (for me) again.
So i initially managed to update my Account and get into the Gallery ;-)
Could someone tell me, if this message shows up the Rogue correctly?
--
Jens Franik
je...@gmx.de
Current beta
Hello Jens,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:10:01 +0100 GMT (16/Dec/10, 22:10 PM +0700 GMT),
Jens Franik wrote:
JF the pcwize Rogues Site is working (for me) again.
JF So i initially managed to update my Account and get into the Gallery ;-)
This might be worthy of a post on TBUDL.
JF Could someone tell
.
- you upload a picture
- that picture has to be approved by Marck ore me (I did that)
- you get a message from the site that a new set is ready (should have happened
by now)
- you download the new rogues.zip and extract it in your images folder
- you insert the x-rogues header in your messages
- you
Am 16.12.2010 16:27, schrieb Thomas Fernandez:
Yes, I mean no. There is no X-Rogue header. I don't see you.
This is curious, i dont see it myself, The other TB is doing something
weird.
--
Jens Franik
je...@gmx.de
Current beta is
Am 16.12.2010 16:49, schrieb Roelof Otten:
you can see yourself
Thunderbird has some problems with this :-)
But now it works.
--
Jens Franik
je...@gmx.de
Current beta is 5.0.0.118 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Jens,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:12:55 +0100 GMT (16/Dec/10, 23:12 PM +0700 GMT),
Jens Franik wrote:
JF But now it works.
Yes: I see you! :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.36.4
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hello Roelof,
A reminder of what Roelof Otten typed on:
Thursday, December 16, 2010 at 16:49:56 GMT +0100
RO Well, actually you're forgetting a few steps.
RO - you upload a picture
RO - that picture has to be approved by Marck ore me (I did that)
RO - you get a message from the site that a
Am 17.12.2010 02:00, schrieb Stuart Cuddy:
you download the new rogues.zip and extract it in your images folder
I'm stuck on this step. The download does not seem to be working.
You can not download?
http://pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip
Thats almost impossible...
--
Jens Franik
Am 17.12.2010 02:00, schrieb Stuart Cuddy:
you download the new rogues.zip and extract it in your images folder
I'm stuck on this step. The download does not seem to be working.
You can not download?
http://pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip
Thats almost impossible...
404 error
The
Dear Costas,
-- Montag, 20. Oktober 2008, 22:37:03:
From where can I download the latest complete file of rogues pics?
Never mind: I found it.
Can you please still share your findings? Thanks
--
best regards | Using The Bat! 3.95.6
www.EddieCastelli.com
Hi Eddie,
Can you please still share your findings? Thanks
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/
http://thebat.zetema.de/links.html
--
Best wishes
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
Current beta is 4.0.34.16 | 'Using TBBETA'
Hello,
From where can I download the latest complete file of rogues pics?
--
Best regards,
Costas
Current beta is 4.0.34.16 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Monday, October 20, 2008, 11:12:05 PM, I wrote:
From where can I download the latest complete file of rogues pics?
Never mind: I found it.
--
Best regards,
Costas
Current beta is 4.0.34.16 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, August 8, 2007, 1:09:53 PM, you wrote:
MM You should stop testing betas, if You have problem, they are buggy... I can
MM understand, You will write about major problems, but rogues?
As long as they are offered AND don't work properly, they are, IMHO, a
considerable
Hi Marek,
on Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:41:49 +0200GMT (08.08.2007, 17:41 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MM You should stop testing betas, if You have problem, they are buggy... I can
MM understand, You will write about major problems, but rogues?
As long as they are offered AND don't work properly
Hello Peter
On Wednesday, August 8, 2007 you wrote:
Hi Marek,
MM You should stop testing betas, if You have
MM problem, they are buggy... I can
MM understand, You will write about major
MM problems, but rogues?
As long as they are offered AND don't work properly,
they are, IMHO
Rick Grunwald wrote:
For the first time I had to go back a version as 10 was so buggy as to
be unusable. I do not say that lightly. From .10 to .11 was a short
cycle but most are considerably longer. Should we in effect go without
mail? I don't think so :)
LOL. just as when i was in
Hello all,
I've just realised that I am not seeing any of your pictures (those of
you who have Rogues). I thought it was some kind of display problem, but
I went back to 3.62.14 and even all the way to good old 3.02.10 and same
thing.
This lead me to find out that what is happening
Hello MAU,
A reminder of what MAU typed on:
Sunday, December 11, 2005 at 18:32:52 GMT +0100
M I've just realised that I am not seeing any of your pictures (those of
M you who have Rogues). I thought it was some kind of display problem, but
M I went back to 3.62.14 and even all the way to good
Hello MAU,
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M I've just realised that I am not seeing any of your pictures (those of
M you who have Rogues). I thought it was some kind of display problem, but
M I went back to 3.62.14 and even all the way to good old 3.02.10 and same
M thing
Hello MAU!
On Sunday, December 11, 2005, 11:32 AM, you wrote:
I've just realised that I am not seeing any of your pictures (those
of you who have Rogues). I thought it was some kind of display
problem, but I went back to 3.62.14 and even all the way to good old
3.02.10 and same thing
Hello Dierk,
Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 1:04:06 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH He that would exchange liberty for temporary safety deserves neither
DH liberty nor safety. (Benjamin Franklin)
Very astute words of wisdom. Are you sure Benjamin Franklin wrote
these words?
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Hello Greg,
On Sunday, July 25, 2004, 8:01:38 PM (Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:01:38) you wrote:
DH He that would exchange liberty for temporary safety deserves neither
DH liberty nor safety. (Benjamin Franklin)
GS Very astute words of wisdom. Are you sure Benjamin Franklin wrote
GS these words?
Hi Mary Bull
-
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, at 21:02:21 [GMT -0500] (which was 7:02 PM where
I live) you wrote:
On Sunday, July 25, 2004, 8:01:38 PM (Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:01:38) you wrote:
DH He that would exchange liberty for temporary safety deserves
Hello Kevin!
On Sunday, July 25, 2004, 9:16 PM, you wrote:
KA This is really OT for this thread.
Sorry. Please forgive me.
--
Best regards,
Mary
Current beta is 2.12.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings All,
I am confused why it matters if rogue pictures show a real face, or a
real body with no face, or, in one exception, a drawing. Does my
email have any less meaning in this list because I use a cartoon or a
drawing of einstein? Since
Monday, July 12, 2004, 10:05:30 PM, Michael wrote:
MLW I am confused why it matters if rogue pictures show a real face, or a
MLW real body with no face, or, in one exception, a drawing. Does my
MLW email have any less meaning in this list because I use a cartoon or a
MLW drawing of einstein?
On
Hello Michael,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:05:30 -0700 (10:05 PM here), you [MLW] wrote:
MLW I am confused why it matters if rogue pictures show a real face,
MLW or a real body with no face, or, in one exception, a drawing.
Personally, I prefer to see a human face because I'm interested in
seeing a
Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote:
Absolutely agree with it, and Allie recently posted a message asking
people to change the subject or create a new thread when bugs are
mentioned.
And I hope that without too much trouble, we'll be put out of our
longstanding and unusually well tolerated misery by
Hello Carsten!
Just now (on 07/10/2004 at 10:21) you wrote:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0003219
Confirmed. Very annoying...
--
Adios,
Bernd (http://www.bd-programs.de - ICQ 12962268)
Current beta is
Hi Bernd!
even (on 10.07.2004 at 12:15) did you write:
Confirmed. Very annoying...
Mhhh, not an error: A user has changed his headers to your name.
--
Bye Bye,
Carsten
www.batworld.de
www.batboard.de
Current beta is v2.12
Hello Carsten,
Confirmed. Very annoying...
CK Mhhh, not an error: A user has changed his headers to your name.
So it is not a bug but user error?
--
9Val
Current beta is v2.12 RC/1 |
Hello 9Val,
Saturday, July 10, 2004, 13:38 you wrote at
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Confirmed. Very annoying...
Mhhh, not an error: A user has changed his headers to your name.
So it is not a bug but user error?
Yes. Some german users are not glad about the new feature. So he
demonstrated
Hello 9val, hello The Bat! - Betalist,
* 9Val wrote:
So it is not a bug but user error?
Not an user error but some kind of misusage like in this mail.
--
cheers
Frank
Current beta is v2.12 RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Frank!
On Saturday, July 10, 2004 at 2:17:43 PM you wrote:
Not an user error but some kind of misusage like in this mail.
A misuse I don't find that troubling, not even a minor inconvenience.
--
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept
The Bat 2.12 RC/1 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service
* 9Val writes:
Confirmed. Very annoying...
Mhhh, not an error: A user has changed his headers to your name.
So it is not a bug but user error?
Design issue. Anyone can set X-Rogue headers as he or she wants to ...
Don't you think that rogues only depend on the sender's email
address?
So
Hello All,
Using auto-downloading of rogues/smileys since RC/3 needs basic magic
knowledge. So, here is the first spell for whom wants to be a mage :))
Create file auto-load-urls.txt in program dir
Add the following line to it:
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/getrogue.php
Restart program
Just
Hello 9Val,
Saturday, July 10, 2004, 10:07:55 PM, you wrote:
9 Using auto-downloading of rogues/smileys since RC/3 needs basic magic
9 knowledge.
Will it be explained in the Care of Magical Creatures lessons? :)))
Thanks for the hint.
Ciao,
luigi
--
Using The Bat! v2.12 RC/3
on Windows
Hello 9Val,
Saturday, July 10, 2004, 2:07:55 PM, you wrote:
9Val Just to see it is not enough, so test it ;)
Worked fine over here on two machines.
--
Leif Gregory (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Tagline of the day:
If I had something funny to say, I'd say it here.
Using The Bat!
Hello TBBeta,
I seem to have overcome my Rogue issues by erasing the listings
in the PDFS2.msl and restarting. All works perfectly now
regardless of whether a sender is in my ADB, in my ADB with
photo, or none of the above.
If I had to guess, it looked like a struggle for rogue image
rights
Hello Cedric,
Friday, July 9, 2004, 12:13:56 PM, you wrote:
Cedric How does it work ? Could I use it for any mailing-list I'm
Cedric subscribed to ?
Yes and no..
Right now it only check for smileys and Roguemoticons on my server.
However at a later point you will be able to specify other
On Friday, July 9, 2004, 3:57 PM, you wrote:
LG About the time this TB beta becomes official, so will Roguemoticons
LG and PCWSmileys. At that point I will be making all my code available
LG under the GPL for anyone to use to set up their own smiley server.
a smiley server, wow!! must be Linux,
Hey Leif!
even (on 09.07.2004 at 21:57) you wrote:
Right now it only check for smileys and Roguemoticons on my server.
However at a later point you will be able to specify other servers
too.
I love this feature :) .
--
Bye,
Carsten
www.batworld.de
www.batboard.de
Hey Costas!
Just now (on 07/07/2004 at 17:57) you noticed:
I downloaded the new version and did everything from the beginning.
Unfortunately, it still gives me the same error message. :(
Did you change the path to your system in the filter-template for the
export to file-filter?
If you edit
Hello Bernd,
Wednesday, July 7, 2004, 7:06:35 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
I downloaded the new version and did everything from the beginning.
Unfortunately, it still gives me the same error message. :(
Did you change the path to your system in the filter-template for the
export to
rogues...
download http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip C:\Program
Files\The Bat!\images\rogues.zip nul
echo extract file...
unzip -qo rogues.zip nul
echo delete old files...
del pdsf2.msl
del rogues.zip
echo.
echo done.
echo.
pause
The line beginning with download wraps around
Hello Costas!
Just now (on 07/07/2004 at 19:02) you meant:
download http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip C:\Program
Files\The Bat!\images\rogues.zip nul
The line beginning with download wraps around and includes the next
line too.
Could you please go to your command line,
Hello Bernd,
Wednesday, July 7, 2004, 8:11:44 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
download http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip C:\Program
Files\The Bat!\images\rogues.zip nul
The line beginning with download wraps around and includes the next
line too.
Could you please go to
Hey Costas!
Just now (on 07/07/2004 at 19:22) you dropped the lines:
You are methodically narrowing it down. When I execute the download
program from the command line I get that error message about it not
being initialized properly.
OK i think i got it now. The download.exe needs the
Hello Bernd,
Wednesday, July 7, 2004, 8:31:16 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
Hey Costas!
Just now (on 07/07/2004 at 19:22) you dropped the lines:
You are methodically narrowing it down. When I execute the download
program from the command line I get that error message about it not
being
Hi Leif!
Just now (on 07/06/2004 at 01:14) you commented:
BD I have made a little package to automate the extraction and
BD organization of the rogues.
Thanks. Sorry, I should have taken care of that earlier. The .MSL
files are all updated to use the rogues folder, and all the images
Hi Bernd,
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, at 22:30:37 [GMT +0200] (which was 2:30 PM where I
live) you wrote:
BD I have made a little package to automate the extraction and
BD organization of the rogues.
Thanks. Sorry, I should have taken care of that earlier. The .MSL
files are all updated to use
Hello Leif!
On Friday, June 18, 2004 at 4:02:38 PM you wrote:
Here, see for yourself. I'm replying twice to your message. Once with
my Rogues Smiley sig, and once without. There's virtually no hit
whatsoever.
And you cheated by changing your sig midway. Although I know that you
specifically
Hello Graham!
On Friday, June 18, 2004 at 4:24:39 PM you wrote:
- It can only include rogues
And?
- It only works in 1 of the viewing modes of TB! - one I don't
actually use (Why TB! has so many selectable viewing and editing
modes is (IMHO) a far more relevant issue to the beta team)
Me
, that was the point. That the only difference between a message
showing a Rogues Smiley and one that does not, is 3 bytes. Those three
bytes attributes to the : _ : that are different in my Rogues sig and
my non-Rogues sig.
I don't see where it was cheating if that was the exact point I was
trying
picture into the library next week).
For instance, looking at my sig below you'll see :Leif_Gregory:
which if you've downloaded the Rogues Smileys images and .MSL file
would show up on your machine as my Rogues Image from the gallery
60 matches
Mail list logo
