TB!3.62.11 Reply Template Anomaly

2005-11-04 Thread Robert D.
I verified this, it is repeatable here. In 3.62.10 a reply template for someone I do Beta Testing for works. In 3.62.11 it does not see the subject nor the From: address. I switched back and forth from one version to the other. Below, I will offer the offending Header minus a couple of things I

Re: TB!3.62.11 Reply Template Anomaly

2005-11-04 Thread Ethan J. Mings
Hello Robert, Friday, November 4, 2005, 7:36:53 AM, you wrote: RD In 3.62.11 it does not see the subject nor the From: address. Confirmed and real problem. I suspect it will be fixed quickly. Jerry -- Ethan J. Mings Current beta

Re: TB!3.62.11 Reply Template Anomaly

2005-11-04 Thread MAU
Hello Ethan, RD In 3.62.11 it does not see the subject nor the From: address. Confirmed and real problem. I suspect it will be fixed quickly. Are you saying that this happens to you with any message you reply to? I have been using this version since last night, have replied to a lot of email

Re: TB!3.62.11 Reply Template Anomaly

2005-11-04 Thread Robert D.
Recently, MAU squawked: Are you saying that this happens to you with any message you reply NO.. NO .. With that PARTICULAR header, or header (mal)formation, or UTF-8 or lack of email in I saw a lot of header differences between ones that (11) replies correctly to and the one I just

Re: TB!3.62.11 Reply Template Anomaly

2005-11-04 Thread 9Val
Hi Ethan, RD In 3.62.11 it does not see the subject nor the From: address. EJM Confirmed and real problem. I suspect it will be fixed quickly. Check in .12 -- 9Val

Re: TB!3.62.11 Reply Template Anomaly

2005-11-04 Thread Robert D.
Recently, 9Val squawked: RD In 3.62.11 it does not see the subject nor the From: address. EJM Confirmed and real problem. I suspect it will be fixed quickly. Check in .12 PERFECT !! TB! #.21.12 *understands* now the odd header that I got from that company. I did reply to them and all is OK