Het was op zaterdag 17 december 2005 om 21:37 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'The Bat! 3.63.14 (Beta) is now available' :
Hoi Peter,
9 [-] Empty ASCII-only headers
PH my template contains these lines:
PH %comment(TheBat! %THEBATVERSION | %WINDOWSPLATFORMNAME %stripped)%-
PH %Modifyonce(X
Hello Peter,
PO So, what's the Empty ASCII-only headers supposed to be then?
PO Enlighten us.
It was the major problem of the .13 - headers that did not contain non-ASCII
characters were encoded into zero-length strings.
Honestly, what are you people doing, breaking stuff that worked as
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, at 12:06:24 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:06 where I
live) Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
...snip
...and there is still a room for last munite fixes that can spoil everything.
I realize that all of you are working hard ;-)
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
Hello Henk,
HMdB I realize that all of you are working hard ;-)
...and not always smart :-)
--
Best regards,
Stefan
Current beta is 3.63.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT:
On Saturday, December 17, 2005, 20:55:51, 9Val wrote:
The Bat! 3.63.14 (Beta) is now available from:
---
thebat.exe - Application Error
---
The instruction at 0x0080f8da referenced memory at 0x00fc. The memory
could not be read.
Click on OK
On 17/12/2005 at 2:55:51 PM [GMT -0500], 9val wrote:
[-] IMAP: message list changes
This one works a lot better so far. No duplicates noted and the folder
counts seem better so far as well. I'll continue testing this one. :)
--
-= Curtis =-
The Bat! v3.63.14 (Beta) /
Hi,
9 The Bat! 3.63.14 (Beta) is now available from:
9 http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
No column-autowidth option still! :-((
--
MfG,
Alto
pgp0UaByBeev1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current beta is 3.63.14 | 'Using TBBETA
Hi All,
The Bat! 3.63.14 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[-] Empty ASCII-only headers
[-] IMAP: message list changes
--
9Val
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, at 21:55:51 [GMT +0200] (which was 20:55 where I
live) 9val wrote:
The Bat! 3.63.14 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[-] Empty ASCII-only headers
[-] IMAP: message list changes
Up and running with OTFE
Answering a current message (Saturday, December 17, 2005, 20:55)
Good evening 9Val,
9 [-] Empty ASCII-only headers
my template contains these lines:
%comment(TheBat! %THEBATVERSION | %WINDOWSPLATFORMNAME %stripped)%-
%Modifyonce(X-Archive, Subject, To)%-
%SetHeader(X-No-Archive,yes)%-
Hello 9Val,
Saturday, December 17, 2005, 7:55:51 PM, you wrote:
Hi All,
The Bat! 3.63.14 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[-] Empty ASCII-only headers
[-] IMAP: message list changes
Installed here switched to internal
Hello 9Val,
Saturday, December 17, 2005, 7:55:51 PM, you wrote:
Hi All,
The Bat! 3.63.14 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[-] Empty ASCII-only headers
[-] IMAP: message list changes
Tried a test message using the Microsoft
On Saturday, December 17, 2005, at 21:37:00 [UTC+0100] (Saturday, December
17, 2005 21:37 my local time) Peter Hampf wrote:
while typing this message, I can see the Comments-header, but none of the
others.
Yes, confirmed. All user-defined fields in the header disappear.
--
Best regards,
Hello 9Val,
The Bat! 3.63.14 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Closed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5442
Closed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5443
New: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5478
New: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id
Hello Zygmunt,
while typing this message, I can see the Comments-header, but none of the
others.
Yes, confirmed. All user-defined fields in the header disappear.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5479
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.63.14
Hello 9Val!
On Saturday, December 17, 2005, 1:55 PM, you wrote:
The Bat! 3.63.14 (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Up and running with no difficulties.
Here is a short list of changes:
[-] Empty ASCII-only headers
Confirm X-Rogue function, https
Hello Peter,
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:37:00 +0100 GMT(12/17/2005, 2:37 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Hampf wrote:
my template contains these lines:
%comment(TheBat! %THEBATVERSION | %WINDOWSPLATFORMNAME %stripped)%-
%Modifyonce(X-Archive, Subject, To)%-
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:29:23 +0100 GMT(12/17/2005, 3:29 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MAU wrote:
Yes, confirmed. All user-defined fields in the header disappear.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5479
Added confirmation note.
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using
Hello MAU!
On Saturday, December 17, 2005, 3:18 PM, you wrote:
New: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5478
Placed a note confirming thatClicking on the To, CC or BCC header
labels does not open Address Book
New: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5479
Placed a note confirming that
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:18:47 +0100 GMT(12/17/2005, 3:18 PM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MAU wrote:
New: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5478
confirmed
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v3.63.14 (Beta) on Windows XP Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello 9Val,
on Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:55:51 +0200 (2005-12-17 20:55:51 in .nl) in the
message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
[] wrote (at least in part):
9 Here is a short list of changes:
9 [-] Empty ASCII-only headers
Not fixed, using templates.
Honestly, what are you people doing,
Hi Peter!
9 [-] Empty ASCII-only headers
Not fixed, using templates.
What templates? I guess, you're talking about other problem - with
setting custom headers from templates...
Honestly, what are you people doing, breaking stuff that worked as
expected before?
It's quite normal when parts
Hello Stefan Tanurkov,
on Sun, 18 Dec 2005 03:52:27 +0200 (2005-12-18 02:52:27 in .nl) in the
message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
[ST] wrote (at least in part):
9 [-] Empty ASCII-only headers
Not fixed, using templates.
ST What templates? I guess, you're talking about other
Hello Peter,
Honestly, what are you people doing, breaking stuff that worked as
expected before?
ST It's quite normal when parts are replaced - this is why it's still
ST a Beta.
Sure, in case you feel like replacing parts of TB code, its your
decision. But, do some (in house) alpha
24 matches
Mail list logo