Re: Memory Leak

2007-12-05 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Ethan, Sunday, November 25, 2007, 3:47:23 PM, you wrote: EJM Can anyone verify this problem? I can't look for the reason, I can only confirm that this .25 version also uses more memory than (seems) necessary and predecessors did. -- Best Wishes, Mark using

Re: Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 17:36:10, Tim Casten wrote: Will the Bat run on this machine without using dualboot and installing xp on it. Kinda defeats the purpose of buying a Mac. The only way you could do that would be with something like VMWare Fusion. -- Jernej Simončič

Re: The Bat! 4.0

2007-12-05 Thread Eddie Castelli
Dear Bob, -- Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007, 18:57:47: This is just my opinion, but it does seem to me that there is here a lot of ill will towards Rit, and anger with having to deal with the brokenness that will appear in betas. I agree that the Beta list has taken on an unproductive and I

Re[3]: The Bat! 4.0

2007-12-05 Thread Bob Riley
Hi Gleason, Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 8:33:55 AM, you wrote: This is just my opinion, but it does seem to me that there is here a lot of ill will towards Rit, and anger with having to deal with the brokenness that will appear in betas. I agree that the Beta list has taken on an

Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Tim Casten
Wife just received new IMAC 24 inch with the Intel Core 2 Duo. Of course I have turned her into a Bat user. Will the Bat run on this machine without using dualboot and installing xp on it. Kinda defeats the purpose of buying a Mac. Thanks in advance. -- TIm Casten Sent via BlackBerry

Re: Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 19:35:18, Vilius Šumskas wrote: I'd recommend Parallels. I've seen both in action, and VMWare Fusion easily justifies it's higher price. -- Jernej Simončič http://deepthought.ena.si/ [The Bat! v3.99.27 on Windows XP Professional x64 Edition 5.2.3790.Service

Re[2]: The Bat! 4.0

2007-12-05 Thread Gleason Pace
Eddie, Sounds to me like some sort of awful mickeysoft bells and whistles program. But then again maybe it won't be as bad as it all sounds. But if a new Version shall be released, why is the TB!beta ML not involved in giving their view? When I recall it from the previous versions

RE: Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Will the Bat run on this machine without using dualboot and installing xp on it. Kinda defeats the purpose of buying a Mac. The only way you could do that would be with something like VMWare Fusion. I'd recommend Parallels. -- Best Regards, Vilius Šumskas LNK TV IT manager

Re[2]: Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Tim Casten
Hello Jernej, Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 4:13:14 PM, you wrote: I've seen both in action, and VMWare Fusion easily justifies it's higher price. Thank you very much. -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bat for Mac or MacBat

2007-12-05 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jernej, On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JS I've seen both in action, and VMWare Fusion easily justifies it's JS higher price. Do you know anyone who's running it using Crossover? I gather TB version 2 worked faultlessly with it but TB 3 doesn't have a rating. I'm