Hello Peter,
Friday, February 23, 2018, 1:05:05 PM, you wrote:
> IMO an empty line is waste of space. I'd like to see variant
> 2. Better than a non-standard-compliant solution such as an extra inquiry.
Yes, I would agree with this method being preferred.
-- Ira
Title: Re: Search in filters
Hello andrei.sliusarenco,
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 01:46:10 +0200 GMT (23-Feb-18, 06:46 +0700 GMT),
andrei.sliusarenco wrote:
But search in the top allows you to find the filter by name
like here
> Hi Andrei,
> As you are looking for new functionality to
Hello Andrei,
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, at 00:40:44 [GMT +0200] (which was 23:40 where I
live) andrei.sliusarenco wrote:
> Dears, we would like to know how often you missclick on first
> message in list and instead of it you clicked on header and as
> result the sorting become broken and you have to
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez,
am Freitag, 23. Februar 2018 um 09:46 schrieben Sie:
I have to scroll down over 100 filters and find the one I am looking for. My
suggestion is to search for the actual filters by filter name.
For example, if the filter name is "China", I would key that word into a
Title: Re: Search in filters
Hello Thomas,
My suggestion is to search for the actual filters by filter name.
For example, if the filter name is "China", I would key that word into a search window and be taken to that filter, which I then can amend.
That is how it works for me, and I
Title: Re: Sorting and first message
Hello andrei.sliusarenco,
Dears, we would like to know how often you missclick on first message in list and instead of it you clicked on header and as result the sorting become broken and you have to restore initial sorting.
Maybe half a dozen times
Title: Re: Search in filters
Hello Lüko and MAU,
and of course Andrei,
Friday, February 23, 2018, 4:16:44 PM, you wrote:
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez,
am Freitag, 23. Februar 2018 um 09:46 schrieben Sie:
I have to scroll down over 100 filters and find the one I am looking for. My
7 matches
Mail list logo
