On Tuesday, May 19, 2020, 11:58:15 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Tbbeta,
> Does your CPU support Intel SHA extensions? These are instructions
> introduced on Intel Goldmont microarchitecture. AMD added support in
> their processors for these instructions starting with Ryzen. There
> are seven new SSE-ba
Hello Maxim,
> The Bat! 9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) is available at
> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb91186-64.rar
>
> What's new in 9.1.18.6 since 9.1.18.5:
> [-] 0001760: An "Access violation" error message appears while
> attaching an open PDF-file via drag-n-drop
> [*] Work in prog
Hello Maxim,
> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK
--- SHA1 benchmark ---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of
1024 bytes took 1.6875 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 868.0674
Megabytes per second
---
Hello MAU,
M> What the Subject says. Any confirmations?
Doesn't happen here with 64 bit.
--
Best regards,
Richardmailto:newmangroup@gmail.com
--
Using The Bat! v9.1.18.6 (ALPHA) on Windows v10 18363 __
Hello list!
* I wrote '[1]:
> Hello Maxim, hello List!
> * Maxim Masiutin via TBBETA wrote '[1]:
>> thebat64.exe /SHA1_BENCHMARK
>> Could you please post your results here? Thank you in advance.
> This is my communication laptop (which is normally running TB!). But I
> can test it on my other
Hello Christoph,
Friday, May 22, 2020, 3:14:08 AM, you wrote:
> 150 data blocks of 1024 bytes took 0.8513 seconds to process by
> SHA1 using CPU instructions (hardware), 1720.6420 Megabytes per
> second; 1.9198 seconds to process by software implementation, 763.0005
> Megabytes per second
Wo
Hello Maxim,
---
SHA1 benchmark
---
This CPU does not support SHA instructions. 150 data blocks of
1024 bytes took 5.9410 seconds to process by SHA1 (software); 246.5652
Megabytes per second
---
OK
7 matches
Mail list logo
