On 2013-05-14, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 02:21 PM, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>> tboot provides a better AP wakeup mechanism based on cpu MWAIT
>> feature for OS/VMM. With this mechanism, system will boot faster and
>> will NOT require VT to be enabled. But it requires that OS/VMM must
>> have
No, this does not really answer the question of what the CPU state looks like.
"Ren, Qiaowei" wrote:
>On 2013-05-14, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 05/14/2013 02:21 PM, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>>> tboot provides a better AP wakeup mechanism based on cpu MWAIT
>>> feature for OS/VMM. With this mechanism,
Oh, the question should be in what states all the AP CPU registers are. Do you
think we need to define the case like what Intel SDM defined for
getsec[SENTER]?
Jimmy
H. Peter Anvin wrote on 2013-05-15:
> No, this does not really answer the question of what the CPU state looks
> like.
>
> "Ren,
On 05/15/2013 09:10 AM, Wei, Gang wrote:
> Oh, the question should be in what states all the AP CPU registers are. Do
> you
> think we need to define the case like what Intel SDM defined for
> getsec[SENTER]?
>
> Jimmy
I'll take a look later today.
-hpa
