At 12:29 + on 21 Dec (1324470582), Wei, Gang wrote:
> Without this delay, Xen could not bring APs up while working with
> TXT/tboot, because tboot need some time in APs to handle INIT before
> becoming ready for receiving SIPIs. (this delay was removed as part of
> c/s 23724 by Tim
At 01:32 + on 22 Dec (1324517520), Wei, Gang wrote:
> Tim Deegan wrote on 2011-12-22:
> > At 12:29 + on 21 Dec (1324470582), Wei, Gang wrote:
> >> Without this delay, Xen could not bring APs up while working with
> >> TXT/tboot, because tboot need some time i
At 10:05 + on 27 Dec (1324980346), Wei, Gang wrote:
> > So you jumped from 100ms to 10us - how was that value established?
> > Or in other words, how certain is it that this (or any other) timeout
> > is sufficient for all current and future systems implementing tboot?
>
> First way, code anal
At 01:22 + on 28 Dec (1325035368), Wei, Gang wrote:
> If no further question on this patch from anyone else, could you help
> to check it in?
Done.
Tim.
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't n
