Size exceeding and autoreply

2002-08-04 Thread Shahar
Hello all. I need your help. I setup an account to delete message greater than 312K. Is there a possibility to send an autoreply to the original sender, inform the sender about this delete and kindly ask the sender to send me a message with the file description ? When I receive the message fro

Re[4]: Is it me or ....

2002-08-04 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hi Syafril, I just noticed your note written Saturday, August 3, 2002, stating: SH> ... you already know that myrealbox.com will go to maintenance SH> mode for 2-days or more, why not change your subcription to SH> digest or set on vacation (the procedure to do that already SH> mention on Welc

Re: Is it me or ....

2002-08-04 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 15:51:00 +0200 Peter Palmreuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SH> Hmm...I have idea, how if we change the procedure to automatically > SH> going to vacation for 14-days instead of unsubscribe. > > That's exactly what I wanted to suggest after reading this thread. > I don't kno

Re: Is it me or ....

2002-08-04 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Syafril, On Saturday, August 3, 2002 at 3:14:40 PM you [SH] wrote (at least in part): SH> Hmm...I have idea, how if we change the procedure to automatically SH> going to vacation for 14-days instead of unsubscribe. That's exactly what I wanted to suggest after reading this thread. I don't

Re: Re[2]: Is it me or ....

2002-08-04 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 20:07:02 +0700 Syafril Hermansyah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ ...] > > A "20 bounce limit, and 3-days reset" would not have lasted the > > weekend, except for those subscribing to the TBUDL-Digest (if there > > is one). Obviously, when a server is down, the number of bounces

Re: Re[2]: Is it me or ....

2002-08-04 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 14:07:11 -0500 Douglas Hinds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I dunno. Let's look at it. None of us were unsubscribed from TBTech, > which suffered the same condition except the message flow is much > less. This indicates that a higher message flow (i.e. TBUDL) > requires a higher