On Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 2:15:40 AM, The wrote:
TFC Hello Jarle H. Knudsen
TFC On Monday, May 2, 2005, 2:32:30 PM +0400 GMT
TFC You wrote:
JHK Seems like the built-in backup is useless for me. I currenly have
JHK 2,4 GB of mail, and growing.
TFC darn that's a lot of emails!
TFC I've been
hiyall,
Backup files larger than 2GB may not then be restored
JHK Seems like the built-in backup is useless for me. I currenly have
JHK 2,4 GB of mail, and growing.
maybe it would be possible to split them into multiple pseudo-accounts
- I e.g. use such accounts as yearly archive containers...
darn that's a lot of emails!
I've been keeping all my emails for almost 10
years now and I dont have that much
I do have that much mail and more because I use my
mail program as a searchable filing cabinet. I
have even committed data to email that is saved
(not sent) and then moved to its
Hello ETM,
Cooking is a hobby, and I also maintain about 7000
recipes in email form,...
7000 recipes? H..., if you wanted to try a different one every day
it would take you almost 20 years to try them all ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5
Cooking is a hobby, and I also maintain about 7000
recipes in email form,...
7000 recipes? H..., if you wanted to try a
different one every day it would take you almost
20 years to try them all ;-)
Recipes in email form don't require bookshelf
space and dusting and I plan to live at
Hello ETM,
Recipes in email form don't require bookshelf
space and dusting and I plan to live at least that
much longer smile.
Elaine (70 this year)
Congratulations for your age and spirit :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5 Return RC2
Hello Jarle H. Knudsen
On Monday, May 2, 2005, 2:32:30 PM +0400 GMT
You wrote:
JHK Seems like the built-in backup is useless for me. I currenly have
JHK 2,4 GB of mail, and growing.
darn that's a lot of emails!
I've been keeping all my emails for almost 10 years now and I dont have that
much
Hello The,
JHK Seems like the built-in backup is useless for me. I currenly have
JHK 2,4 GB of mail, and growing.
darn that's a lot of emails!
I've been keeping all my emails for almost 10 years now and I dont have that
much
If you wish I can let you borrow about 1 GB of mine ;-)
--
Best
Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 6:47:30 PM, Britt Malka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be beware if you make a backup that you cannot restore more than 2 GB.
Is the 2 GB limit for each mail folder, the total size of all folders,
or perhaps the backup image?
--
Jarle H. Knudsen
Hi,
A friend of mine has recently started using The Bat! and has over
50,000 messages in it (most imported from OE). The problem is that it
takes quite a while to close The Bat!. It shows Compressing folders
for more than a couple of mins.
Is there any way to get around this suitation?
Thanks,
Dear K,
@2-Feb-2005, 07:41 -0600 (02-Feb 13:41 UK time) K. Shantanu [KS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... snip
KS takes quite a while to close The Bat!. It shows Compressing folders
KS for more than a couple of mins.
KS Is there any way to get around this suitation?
The best way I find is to
ON Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 2:41:09 PM, you wrote:
KS Hi,
KS A friend of mine has recently started using The Bat! and has over
KS 50,000 messages in it (most imported from OE). The problem is that it
KS takes quite a while to close The Bat!. It shows Compressing folders
KS for more than a
* Britt Malka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050202 08:56]:
Hi K.,
Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 2:41:09 PM you wrote:
It shows Compressing folders for more than a couple of mins. Is
there any way to get around this suitation?
Yes.
Account - Properties - Options - Remove v from Compress
, there is! especially with heavy frequented and large mailboxes...
well, at least there was a substantial chance of the mailbox getting
corrupted some times ago... (I changed my behaviour and that of our
users to regularly compress and purge the inbox those times, so we did
not see any more of those problems
hiyall,
G ON Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 4:18:58 PM, you wrote:
KS Is there any chance with using the compression facility (even a remote
KS chance) that I might lose data in any case?
G It is actually the other way around, if you do not use it the change for file
G corruption increases.
of
* Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050202 11:37]:
ON Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 4:18:58 PM, you wrote:
KS Is there any chance with using the compression facility (even a remote
KS chance) that I might lose data in any case?
It is actually the other way around, if you do not use it the change
hiyall,
KS Can someone tell why NOT compressing and purging the data increases
KS chances of data corruption.
if there is substantial movement of messages in the folder, the
mailbox file grows and becomes more and more fragmented as the system
is only marking deleted mails as such... so the
ON Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 6:43:17 PM, you wrote:
NL if no messages are moving in and out, nothing happens of course...
Which does not seem to be the case otherwise P+C would not take minutes.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
18 matches
Mail list logo
