On Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 2:15:40 AM, The wrote:
TFC> Hello Jarle H. Knudsen
TFC> On Monday, May 2, 2005, 2:32:30 PM +0400 GMT
TFC> You wrote:
JHK>> Seems like the built-in backup is useless for me. I currenly have
JHK>> 2,4 GB of mail, and growing.
TFC> darn that's a lot of emails!
TFC> I've
hiyall,
>> "Backup files larger than 2GB may not then be restored"
JHK> Seems like the built-in backup is useless for me. I currenly have
JHK> 2,4 GB of mail, and growing.
maybe it would be possible to split them into multiple pseudo-accounts
- I e.g. use such accounts as yearly archive containe
Hello ETM,
> Recipes in email form don't require bookshelf
> space and dusting and I plan to live at least that
> much longer .
>
>
> Elaine (70 this year)
Congratulations for your age and spirit :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5 Return RC2
___
>> Cooking is a hobby, and I also maintain about 7000
>> recipes in email form,...
> 7000 recipes? H..., if you wanted to try a
> different one every day it would take you almost
> 20 years to try them all ;-)
Recipes in email form don't require bookshelf
space and dusting and I plan to live
Hello ETM,
> Cooking is a hobby, and I also maintain about 7000
> recipes in email form,...
7000 recipes? H..., if you wanted to try a different one every day
it would take you almost 20 years to try them all ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5 Re
> darn that's a lot of emails!
> I've been keeping all my emails for almost 10
> years now and I dont have that much
I do have that much mail and more because I use my
mail program as a searchable filing cabinet. I
have even committed data to email that is saved
(not sent) and then moved to its
Hello The,
JHK>> Seems like the built-in backup is useless for me. I currenly have
JHK>> 2,4 GB of mail, and growing.
>
> darn that's a lot of emails!
> I've been keeping all my emails for almost 10 years now and I dont have that
> much
If you wish I can let you borrow about 1 GB of mine ;-)
--
Hello Jarle H. Knudsen
On Monday, May 2, 2005, 2:32:30 PM +0400 GMT
You wrote:
JHK> Seems like the built-in backup is useless for me. I currenly have
JHK> 2,4 GB of mail, and growing.
darn that's a lot of emails!
I've been keeping all my emails for almost 10 years now and I dont have that
much
> Seems like the built-in backup is useless for me. I currenly have
> 2,4 GB of mail, and growing.
My mail of about that same amount backs up to
about a 500+ MB file. I do total backups, but
believe they also can be incremental, just haven't
tested that. I successfully restored just recently
af
Monday, May 2, 2005, 2:41:19 PM, Britt Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is the 2 GB limit for each mail folder, the total size of all folders,
>> or perhaps the backup image?
> It must be the backup image, because I was told that:
> "Backup files larger than 2GB may not then be restored"
See
Hi Jarle,
Sunday, May 1, 2005 at 1:15:05 PM you wrote:
> Is the 2 GB limit for each mail folder, the total size of all folders,
> or perhaps the backup image?
It must be the backup image, because I was told that:
"Backup files larger than 2GB may not then be restored"
--
Kind regards,
Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 6:47:30 PM, Britt Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Be beware if you make a backup that you cannot restore more than 2 GB.
Is the 2 GB limit for each mail folder, the total size of all folders,
or perhaps the backup image?
--
Jarle H. Knudsen
___
ON Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 6:43:17 PM, you wrote:
NL> if no messages are moving in and out, nothing happens of course...
Which does not seem to be the case otherwise P+C would not take minutes.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
hiyall,
KS> Can someone tell why NOT compressing and purging the data increases
KS> chances of data corruption.
if there is substantial "movement" of messages in the folder, the
mailbox file grows and becomes more and more fragmented as the system
is only marking deleted mails as such... so the i
* Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050202 11:37]:
>
> ON Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 4:18:58 PM, you wrote:
> KS> Is there any chance with using the compression facility (even a remote
> KS> chance) that I might lose data in any case?
>
> It is actually the other way around, if you do not use it the
Hi K.,
Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 4:18:58 PM you wrote:
> Is there any chance with using the compression facility (even a remote
> chance) that I might lose data in any case?
I don't think so, but with computers you can never be sure :-)
Be beware if you make a backup that you cannot restor
hiyall,
G> ON Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 4:18:58 PM, you wrote:
KS>> Is there any chance with using the compression facility (even a remote
KS>> chance) that I might lose data in any case?
G> It is actually the other way around, if you do not use it the change for file
G> corruption increases.
ON Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 4:18:58 PM, you wrote:
KS> Is there any chance with using the compression facility (even a remote
KS> chance) that I might lose data in any case?
It is actually the other way around, if you do not use it the change for file
corruption increases.
You will need to p
case?
yes, there is! especially with heavy frequented and large mailboxes...
well, at least there was a substantial chance of the mailbox getting
corrupted some times ago... (I changed my behaviour and that of our
users to regularly compress and purge the inbox those times, so we did
not see any m
* Britt Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050202 08:56]:
> Hi K.,
>
> Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 2:41:09 PM you wrote:
>
> > It shows "Compressing folders" for more than a couple of mins. Is
> > there any way to get around this suitation?
>
> Yes.
>
> Account -> Properties -> Options -> Remove v
Hi K.,
Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 2:41:09 PM you wrote:
> It shows "Compressing folders" for more than a couple of mins. Is
> there any way to get around this suitation?
Yes.
Account -> Properties -> Options -> Remove v from Compress folders on
exit.
--
Kind regards,
Britt Malka
|\
ON Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 2:41:09 PM, you wrote:
KS> Hi,
KS> A friend of mine has recently started using The Bat! and has over
KS> 50,000 messages in it (most imported from OE). The problem is that it
KS> takes quite a while to close The Bat!. It shows "Compressing folders"
KS> for more than
Dear K,
@2-Feb-2005, 07:41 -0600 (02-Feb 13:41 UK time) K. Shantanu [KS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
...
KS> takes quite a while to close The Bat!. It shows "Compressing folders"
KS> for more than a couple of mins.
KS> Is there any way to get around this suitation?
The best way I find is to
Hi,
A friend of mine has recently started using The Bat! and has over
50,000 messages in it (most imported from OE). The problem is that it
takes quite a while to close The Bat!. It shows "Compressing folders"
for more than a couple of mins.
Is there any way to get around this suitation?
Thanks,
S
24 matches
Mail list logo
