Re: PGP signing question.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 8:38:53 PM, Gary wrote: p>> Technically if you want to get down and say that, then I've always p>> heard that the older the version of pgp (ie. 2.x) are harder to p>> crack than the newer windows versions. I can't remember

Re[3]: PGP signing question.

Hi Phil, On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 10:20:43 PM, you wrote in part about "PGP signing question.": p> Technically if you want to get down and say that, then I've always p> heard that the older the version of pgp (ie. 2.x) are harder to p> crack than the newer windows versions. I can't remember w

Re[2]: PGP signing question.

Greetings Nick! On Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 18:05:08 GMT -0700 (which was 6:05 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: NA> The latest freeware version of PGP is 6.5.3, and PGP Desktop Security 7.0 NA> has already been released, although the freeware version has not. There is NA> no

Re: PGP signing question.

On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 3:24:42 PM, Chuck Mattsen wrote: > I'm sure there are reasons of which I'm simply unaware, but why cannot > one simply have their multiple addresses on *one* key? Why the need > for multiple keys? Although PGP allows for more than one User name or E-Mail address for u

Re: PGP signing question.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 4:52:37 PM, Christian Dysthe wrote: CD> U.why is that? Isn't PGP..eh..PGP? I mean isn't a 1024 key just as CD> secure implemented in The Bat! as used from an external application? I am CD> not expert, maybe I have m

Re[2]: PGP signing question.

Hello Nick, Saturday, May 27, 2000, 5:25:22 PM, you wrote: NA> Hopefully, PGP will be better implemented in Version 2.0, but until then, NA> it's my feeling that the external PGP implementation, as opposed to the NA> internal, would better accommodate the security concerns of TB! Users. U

Re[2]: C-Win (was:Re: customization questions)

Hi Thomas, > While TB is in English, the day of the week, and the > month, are diaplayed as in Chinese. While I can read that > much, it is not aestthetic to much scripts and languages. > I understood in your earlier posting that you can switch > this to English somehow. I guess I was mistaken.

Re: PGP signing question.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 3:13:43 PM, Christian Dysthe wrote: > I see you use an "external" PGP > implementation. It wouldn't be that the internal PGP implementation in > The Bat! can do this? I am now pretty sure it can't after having > looked in e

Re: PGP signing question.

On Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 5:13 PM or thereabouts, Christian Dysthe wrote the following about PGP signing question.: Christian> You are right though, in these multi mail account times Christian> when even your average ISP gives you a few aliases this Christian> functionality would be very helpf

Re[2]: PGP signing question.

Hello Nick, Saturday, May 27, 2000, 12:15:17 AM, you wrote: NA> I have two Accounts Christian, and would like to do the same thing, but NA> I've not figured out how, unless someone else has come up with a way. It NA> would be a nice implementation though. NA> Instead, TB! simply PGP clear-signs

Re: Newbie with Address Book Problem

Hello Listmembers, On Fri, 26 May 2000 at 18:13:23 [GMT -0500] Allie Martin wrote: > I see what you mean. The sorting is, however, simply done in the > reverse order. Strange. It doesn't toggle sorting by first name as > opposed to last name. Are you happy with what it does there? It rea

Re: TB! as MAPI mailer

Hello Urban, Saturday, May 27, 2000, 7:21:23 PM, you wrote: U> Can I use the Bat! as my MAPI mailprogram? It seems not alas! I too have great need for this feature and had been hoping it might be incorporated into one of the upgrades. No such luck unfortunately. -- Best regards, Tony

Re: PGP-decryption

On Sat, 27 May 2000 10:09:13 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote: NA> Allie, I think Robert wants to delete the original _encrypted_ NA> message, once it's been decrypted. As it stands, TB! now produces a NA> totally separate unecrypted copy of the message which he wants to NA> keep, and then delete the o

TB! as MAPI mailer

Can I use the Bat! as my MAPI mailprogram? -- Urban -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: To Unsubscribe fr

Re: Multi Address Users

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 1:38:15 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: > Indeed. OTOH, I won't actually use the AB in that way - I'll stay with > the way it is now for a simple reason: I don't want to be interrupted > by an extra dialog when trying

Re: PGP-decryption

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 9:05:18 AM, Allie Martin wrote: RB>> Is it possible to decrypt the original message instead of creating a RB>> decrypted copy? I save all messages decrypted here, so I have to RB>> delete the original manually for the momen

Re: PGP-decryption

On Sat, 27 May 2000 14:42:11 +0200, Robert Bratgjerd wrote: RB> Is it possible to decrypt the original message instead of creating a RB> decrypted copy? I save all messages decrypted here, so I have to RB> delete the original manually for the moment. If not, can I use a RB> filter or macro to del

Re: C-Win (was:Re: customization questions)

Hallo Ming-Li, On Sat, 27 May 2000 06:27:58 -0700 GMT (27.05.2000, 21:27 +0800 GMT), Ming-Li wrote: ML> What you want (if I understand you correctly) is for the whole ML> Windows to display English by default, which is impossible in ML> C-Windows. Thanks; I already decided to install an English

Apology. (was FreeStuff)

Hi TBUDL, I was just checking the most recent postings to this list and was aghast to see I'd sent an earlier email with the title FreeStuff to this list instead of to my normal address. I promise everyone here that it was an unintentional mistake and I apologise for sending inappropriate mail t

Re: C-Win (was:Re: customization questions)

Hi Thomas, ML>> [snip]..., even after I've set the nationality of my ML>> Windows as "English (United States)". Even funnier when ML>> I set Windows as Chinese (Taiwan), ...[snip] > You mean you can switch C-Win98 between English and Chinese? Mine is > always in Chinese (Taiwan) and my Chinese r

PGP-decryption

I have a question regarding the PGP-support in The Bat! : Is it possible to decrypt the original message instead of creating a decrypted copy? I save all messages decrypted here, so I have to delete the original manually for the moment. If not, can I use a filter or macro to delete the original s

FreeStuff

Hi Mark, http://www.bahlsen.co.uk/try.htm Bahlsen http://www.myfreeld.com/download.html Free Telecom offers... Cheers, Mark -- -- - Using TheBat! 1.44 Windows NT 4 0 1381 Service Pack 6 -

SMTP

hallo TBUDL! are there plans to read mail via monitoring an SMTP-directory in BAT? (see PMMAIL) PAT -- vcard/LDAP/PGP: http://dresden-online.com/~perler/identity.html PGP fingerprint: DAC6 2FDA 1ED7 AD55 BD1F 5142 3D5F 72BF -- -

Change DUN connection for International Roaming with Laptop

Hello TBUDL! I have two DUN connections set up. When I chose Option/Dial-up Monitor/Show always, I have the possibility to change the "Phoen book entry". But then there is no button "connect now". So I choose "check mail for all", but TB changes the phone book entry back to the default. How do

Re: Multi Address Users

Hi Nick, On 27 May 2000 at 18:07:24 GMT -0700 (which was 02:07 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Multi Address Users": >> 2) (and *this* is how the TB Address Book *should* be used in such >>circumstances) have a separate AB entry for each address

Re: OT: Date of TB v1.15

Hi Sir, On 26 May 2000 at 22:41:49 GMT +0200 (which was 21:41 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "OT: Date of TB v1.15": >I am trying to find out exactly how long am I flying on >TB:) So, does anyone know [approximately] the

Re: TB! Version 1.44 is available...

Hi Mark, On 27 May 2000 at 01:22:52 GMT +0100 (which was 01:22 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "TB! Version 1.44 is available...": > Sorry folks - I'm not desperate to reply to my own posts but I > noticed in the "What's new" text a message sta

Re: Address book?

This message: 27/05/2000 00:08 GMT. Hello Jast, On 26 May 2000 at 00:30:22 GMT +0200 (which was 15:30 where I live) Jast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: J> I also made a universal macro thingie for mailing lists like this: Many thanks Jast, I knew it was something simple like that. -- ___