Hello Reza,
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:29:46 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:29 +0700 GMT),
Reza Habib wrote:
RH Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay your mail to the
RH host directly, bypassing the isp. That would be a really cool feature
RH for TB to adopt.
You need to stay connected
Hello Keith,
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:06:23 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:06 +0700 GMT),
Keith Rodrigues wrote:
KR 2) Use a free email service that allows you to send from their
KR smtp server, with authentication. I use myrealbox
KR (www.myrealbox.com) for this. Set up an account with them, then
KR
Hello Peter,
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:45:20 +0200 GMT (24/05/02, 20:45 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
PP More correct is: it's a not folder based view-filter, once applied valid
PP for all folders you're about to browse to, until you release the filter
PP (e.g. with Ctrl++)
Or with the esc
Saturday, 25 May 2002
Hi RapidFX,
On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 16:47:08 [GMT -0800] (which was 12:47 p.m.
here in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote:
R I can confirm issues with 1.60m and XP.
R flaky is about the correct description also :)
R Seems leaving Bat! open for lengths of time over 1-2 hours
R or
Hello Dave!
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 6:37:46 PM you wrote:
Also, Opera seems more flaky that usual, but also able to access sites
that I used to have problems with. Anyone have similar flakiness issue
with Opera since 6.02?
I didn't ever had any problems during the last months, when I
Hi Dierk,
Saturday, May 25, 2002, 8:50:42 AM, you wrote:
Also, Opera seems more flaky that usual, but also able to access sites
that I used to have problems with. Anyone have similar flakiness issue
with Opera since 6.02?
DH I didn't ever had any problems during the last months, when I
On Saturday, May 25, 2002, 03:18, Mark Wieder wrote:
Any experience using The Bat! as a service under Windows NT / 2k
server?
No, sorry.
I've currently got it configured as a System Task set to launch on
restart, but that has the following problems:
What do you mean by system task?
El viernes 24 de mayo de 2002, 22.18, Mark Wieder decía:
MW Any experience using The Bat! as a service under Windows NT / 2k
MW server?
no, but TB is not a service. How do you want to do it?
And, if you don't mind, why do you want to do it?
--
Ricardo M. Reyes | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El sábado 25 de mayo de 2002, 1.05, Jonathan Angliss decía:
JA Might not be a TB thing... might be an ISP thing setting a rule saying only one
JA connection at once from a single IP (odd rule, but you never know). I wouldn't
JA see that TB! would have a problem as it opens a seperate socket
On Sat, 25 May 2002 09:25:22 -0300 Ricardo M. Reyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW Any experience using The Bat! as a service under Windows NT / 2k
MW server?
no, but TB is not a service. How do you want to do it?
Someday in the past I run TB! as Service in NT4 Server, I was using
Firedaemon
On 25 May 2002, 13:25, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote:
no, but TB is not a service. How do you want to do it?
And, if you don't mind, why do you want to do it?
~~~
I can think of one reason to want to run TB as a service -- if you're
running it in server mode and don't want it to stop functioning
Hi Geoff,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 14:43:31 +0100, you wrote:
The other alternative is to leave a relevant user logged in which,
depending on physical security around the machine, may not be
acceptable.
But with NT, you press CTRL ALT DEL, and lock the work station if the person is
walking away,
Friday, May 24, 2002, 9:37:46 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
DC Also, Opera seems more flaky that usual, but also able to access sites
DC that I used to have problems with. Anyone have similar flakiness issue
DC with Opera since 6.02?
Yes. I found version 6 to be kind of flakey, in that it
crashes on
On Saturday, May 25, 2002, 4:44:33 AM, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote:
If I check again the failed one, it goes ok.
It seems to fail when attempting to connect simultaneously to the same
server, although I don't know if it's a problem at TB or softhome.net.
Anyone had the same problem?
Yes, all
On Sat, 25 May 2002 09:23:36 +0100 Julian Beach (Lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be good if there could be a way of extending the timeout
period in TB. I think that I would have had this problem in Outlook,
but since the timeout was 1 minute, it was rarely a problem.
As far as the
GL On 25 May 2002, 13:25, Ricardo M. Reyes wrote:
GL I can think of one reason to want to run TB as a service -- if you're
GL running it in server mode and don't want it to stop functioning just
GL because no-one's logged onto the machine. The requester is running TB
GL on NT Server, so that
Marcus-
Thanks. I missed this option. I'll look around for it.
Saturday, May 25, 2002, 2:01:18 AM, you wrote:
MO There is an option for services: Allow service to interact with
MO desktop. Maybe this would help? I've never used it with TB! but I have
MO with other programs and it worked like
Saturday, May 25, 2002, 2:01:18 AM, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
MO What do you mean by system task?
Sorry - I meant Scheduled Task.
-Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.60h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build
2195 Service Pack 2
Current Ver:
tbudl,
I was just going through some folders and changing column size... Is
there a way to auto size them (similar to double clicking the
header separator in the evil applications like -dare I say it- M$
Excel)?
Note, I don't want to change any of the current behavior, just add
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas F [TF] wrote:
...
TF You said it. I used myrealbox this for three years when I lived in
TF Taiwan, and regardless which ISP I was connected to, it always
TF delivered all my mails from any account. :-)
At what speed?
Slower than your ISP's
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 13:36:06 +0700, you wrote:
Hello Reza,
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:29:46 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:29 +0700 GMT),
Reza Habib wrote:
RH Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay your mail to the
RH host directly, bypassing the isp. That would be a
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 12:54:14 -0500 GMT (26/05/02, 00:54 +0700 GMT),
Allie C Martin wrote:
ACM MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense that
ACM it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP SMTP server
ACM instead of doing a direct delivery.
OK
Hello Allie,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 12:57:19 -0500 GMT (26/05/02, 00:57 +0700 GMT),
Allie C Martin wrote:
TF You said it. I used myrealbox this for three years when I lived in
TF Taiwan, and regardless which ISP I was connected to, it always
TF delivered all my mails from any account. :-)
ACM At
On 20020525, Tim Musson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just going through some folders and changing column
size... Is there a way to auto size them (similar to double
clicking the header separator in the evil applications like
-dare I say it- M$ Excel)?
This is a default behaviour in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Om 20:58 op zaterdag 25 mei 2002, Tone Marie Berg:
This is a default behaviour in Windows which all applications should
inherit, actually. Explorer does this, and all Windows applications
behaving as expected should do this.
trust me, it is
On Sun, 26 May 2002 01:18:29 +0700 Thomas F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ACM MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense
ACM that it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP
ACM SMTP server instead of doing a direct delivery.
OK then, why would I need MDaemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas F [TF] wrote:
...
ACM MDaemon here can be configured to use an SMTP host in the sense
ACM that it delivers mail to another SMTP server, usually your ISP
ACM SMTP server instead of doing a direct delivery.
TF OK then, why would I need MDaemon
Folks,
I had a problem where I was trying to send a message and my SMTP server was
rejecting my connection. The Bat! told me to check the log file. I thought
it was referring to the account.log file associated with the account, but
the account.log file told me to also check the logfile. So the
28 matches
Mail list logo
