Hello Pete!
On Saturday, June 8, 2002 at 9:04:36 PM you wrote:
Is this more what you are looking for?? If not, show me what it should
look like.
You did it right.
And just adding this delimiter worked for me to make the form of your
message more readable. :-)
Thank you!
--
Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, June 9, 2002, 12:43 AM, you wrote:
A Whenever I try the Quick Search, I usually give up on it.
TF I have made very good experiences with the Search function. Given your
TF experience, it appears to be quicker than Quick Search to find
Hello ,
--
Best regards,
stockhelp263net mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives :
Hello Frank.
At 3:49 PM on Saturday, June 08, 2002 you wrote the
following about [Removing mail list prefixes]:
Frank I am new to useing the bat, and things like the
Frank above are very much like reading a foreign language
Frank to me. Is there any way of getting an easy to
Frank understand
On Sunday, June 9, 2002, 4:29:30 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
I am very disorganized, too many filters too many accounts and I
can't find things!
another thing which would be very helpful would be to be able to
search the sorting offices.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS
On Sunday, June 9, 2002, 2:00:41 PM, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
Also the tech list group are quite helpful with regexp[s]
there is one book -- name escapes me @ the moment --
that is an excellent tutorial.
The book I have, which I have found very useful, is Mastering Regular
Expressions, by
Replying to your message of Sunday, June 9, 2002, 2:23:50 AM:
Dierk (and Roelof),
Thanks for the help. I didn't even have to have my Daughter help me. ;o)
--
Pete
Sunday, June 9, 2002
8:54:19 AM
This e-mail is brought to you by:
The Bat: Version 1.60q
Windows 2000 build
Sunday, June 9, 2002, 7:27:21 AM, you wrote:
DAC another thing which would be very helpful would be to be able to
DAC search the sorting offices.
I'll second that motion .. I recently dumped all my
filters and started over, but with several lists coming
in, it gets hard to find and modify
Hi Lynn,
on Sun, 9 Jun 2002 08:57:56 -0700GMT (09.06.02, 17:57 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
LT I have a yahoo list now that for some reason is dumping
LT some, but not all mail into my 'known' box ... it's very
LT annoying, but I can't figure out why
Is there a way change HTML incoming mail to text only? In other words, I
am not wanting to receive any HTML mail. I realize I don't have to view
it as HTML but was wondering if I can get rid of it all together.
--
Pete
10:28:30 AM
Ask about eScan
Hi Lynn,
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 08:57:56 -0700, you wrote:
I have a yahoo list now that for some reason is dumping
some, but not all mail into my 'known' box ... it's very
annoying, but I can't figure out why it's happening. I'm
sure there's more than one filter involved here (I've
been trying
Sunday, June 9, 2002, 9:25:18 AM, you wrote:
PM Hi Lynn,
PM on Sun, 9 Jun 2002 08:57:56 -0700GMT (09.06.02, 17:57 +0200GMT here),
PM you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
LT I have a yahoo list now that for some reason is dumping
LT some, but not all mail into my 'known'
Sunday, June 9, 2002, 9:35:16 AM, you wrote:
JA Order of filters is very important. They execute in the order they are
JA displayed. If you have the known rule enabled, and a member of the yahoo list
JA mails to that list, the known rule will kick in *before* the yahoo list filter
JA *if*
Hello Eriks,
Saturday, June 8, 2002, 7:47:31 PM, you wrote:
ET I am also using The Bat! since version 1.53 and did not have this
ET problem until version 1.60n. Then I tried versions n/nolog, n5, p, q -
ET still the same problem.
Oh, I see. I am still using version 1.60m, and so everything
Running The Bat! Version 1.60m on Windows 98 Build
Marck,
You'll have to temporarily turn it off. It is completely *unnecessary*
to have the interactive scanner running for the plug-in to work.
You're right. Apparently there was an argument going on as to which
was getting to examine
Hello TBUDL,
When I use the %OMSGID macro in my reply template, the result is
something like this:
you wrote in mid:%OMSGID:
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
which makes the reference non-clickable. How do I automatically remove
the superfluous sign so that I get
you wrote
On Sunday, June 9, 2002, 20:24:28 (+0200 GMT) Avenarius wrote:
which makes the reference non-clickable. How do I automatically remove
the superfluous sign so that I get
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
try this one:
you wrote in
Hello Technology,
On Saturday, June 8, 2002 at 16:50 GMT -0400, a creature mimicking
Bill Blinn, Technology Editor [BBT] wrote:
%subject=Re:%setpattregexp='(?i)\A\:?(\s*\[.*\])%-
?(\s*(re|ha|rcpt|fwd|fw)(\[\d*\])?:\s*)*(.*)'%-
%RegExpBlindMatch='%OSubj'%SubPatt='5'
snip
BBT This is a regular
Hi tbudl,
The reply template does not work properly anymore in 1.60q.
I do not get the to indicate the quote with the initials.
Here is my reply template:
%SUBJECT=%REPLYCOUNTER %OSUBJOn %ODATE, %OFROMNAME wrote:
%SUBJ
%TEXT
%REPLYADDR
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
sender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Syv [S] wrote:
...
S %SUBJECT=%REPLYCOUNTER %OSUBJOn %ODATE, %OFROMNAME wrote:
S %SUBJ
S %TEXT
^
this should be %Quotes
S %REPLYADDR
- --
-=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB!
Hello Thomas,
On Sunday, June 9, 2002 at 11:41 GMT +0700, a creature mimicking
Thomas F [TF] wrote:
TF right, but you are posting to localhost, so I think this cannot be an
TF ISP problem either. Why do you post to localhost? Can there be a
TF problem with the software that you are posting to -
Mine seems to work. Do you need %Quotes in the template?
I am a bit new here so I may be wrong.
--
Best regards,
Bobmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 09/06/2002 at 21:56, you wrote:
Hi tbudl,
The reply template does not work properly anymore in 1.60q.
I do
Hi Rick,
On Sunday, June 9, 2002, 9:07:48 PM, you wrote:
Rick Sorry for the off topic post, but I just had to thank whoever it was
Rick on this list that recommended trying out the Andale Mono font which
Rick not only puts a 'dot' in the middle of '0' numbers but also works
Rick great as a font
Hello Pete,
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 10:30:07 -0600GMT (9-6-02, 18:30 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
PM Is there a way change HTML incoming mail to text only? In other words, I
PM am not wanting to receive any HTML mail.
Yes.
Check on 'Content-Type:text/html' in the kludges and use as
Hello Rick,
Sunday, June 9, 2002, 3:07:48 PM, you wrote:
RR trying out the Andale Mono font which not only puts a 'dot' in the
RR middle of '0' numbers but also works great as a font for my
RR programming needs.
Where did you find/get such a font?
I looked under Options|Preferences|Viewer Tab
Hi folks,
I'm working on a mass mailing and I would like to insert the
recipient's Company name into the text. However when I use %COMPANY
only a blank space appears in each of the emails. I have made sure
that the recipient's Company name does exist under the business tab of
the Address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andy,
@10 June 2002, 19:17:49 -0400 (00:17 UK time) Andy Fluke wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is %COMPANY a valid macro?
No - you want %ABtoCompany.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB!
On Sunday, June 9, 2002, 6:00:06 PM, Greg Strong wrote:
GS Where did you find/get such a font?
Sorry I forgot to post the link (although I notice Ben did):
Download it from here:
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/default.htm
--
Rick
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A wise
On Sunday, June 09, 2002, Bob Lister wrote:
1.60q replies
,- [Bob Lister :: 1.60q replies]
| Mine seems to work. Do you need %Quotes in the template?
`-
Thanks, it works with %quotes, but I have been using this
template since 1.42, and I have never needed the %quotes
[EMAIL
29 matches
Mail list logo
