Re[2]: how to train K9 ?

2004-03-19 Thread Hartwig Harder
Hi Peter, PM on Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:10:01 +0100GMT, you wrote: PM I don't believe there is. And there shouldn't be. You'd better train PM K9 with the spam *you* actually receive. This way you will get K9 to PM filter to *your* needs. Well, exactly for that reason I would like to be able to

Re: BayesIt

2004-03-19 Thread Stuart Hemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 RO No. If it would do that, it should decide on spam on the headers, RO that's not very likely to be a very precise method. sighI expected that./sigh - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by

Antivirus problem noted and solved

2004-03-19 Thread Bill Blinn - Technology Editor
This morning I received a message from a friend who began using The Bat after reading my recommendation of it. Here it is, edited slightly. I signed off TBUDL a while ago because The Bat had moved from being a major part of my thoughts to being a program which just works. However I hit a

Re: how to train K9 ?

2004-03-19 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Hartwig, on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:15:00 +0100GMT, you wrote: PM I don't believe there is. And there shouldn't be. You'd better train PM K9 with the spam *you* actually receive. This way you will get K9 to PM filter to *your* needs. HH Well, exactly for that reason I would like to be able

Re: Synchronizing Desktop with Notebook

2004-03-19 Thread Kevin Coates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi cs4l, On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:18:50 +0100 (2:18 AM here), cs4l [c] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: c You could use both machines to read email, and with synchronize, c you could then transfer the messages which have been read on one c machine to

Wrap in Fwd'd Messages

2004-03-19 Thread Joseph N.
I received a message mailed out from Outlook/Exchange, and the paragraphs appeared fine in TB! I forwarded the message, and the paragraphs in the TB! composition window were not wrapped. 1. Why? 2. I used Alt-L, but, if I had not done that, would they have wrapped on mailing or otherwise

Re: Synchronizing Desktop with Notebook

2004-03-19 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Friday, March 19, 2004, 2:41:03 PM, Kevin Coates wrote: Ah, I think I understand now. So I needn't worry which machine I download mail with as long as I synchronize periodically. Thanks for the explanation. The other thing to remember to TB! synch is that it is one way each time, that is,

Re: Antivirus problem noted and solved

2004-03-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Bill, On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:34:49 -0500 GMT (19/03/2004, 18:34 +0700 GMT), Bill Blinn - Technology Editor wrote: BBTE This morning I received a message from a friend who began using The BBTE Bat after reading my recommendation of it. Here it is, edited BBTE slightly. [...] It took a

Re: Wrap in Fwd'd Messages

2004-03-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Joseph, On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:54:25 + (UTC) GMT (19/03/2004, 21:54 +0700 GMT), Joseph N. wrote: JN I received a message mailed out from Outlook/Exchange, and the JN paragraphs appeared fine in TB! I forwarded the message, and the JN paragraphs in the TB! composition window were not

Re[2]: how to train K9 ?

2004-03-19 Thread Hartwig Harder
Hi Peter, thanks a lot for the information. That was the missing link I apparently kept ignoring. Cheers Thanks, Hartwig Friday, March 19, 2004, 1:14:35 PM, you wrote: PM Hi Hartwig, PM on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:15:00 +0100GMT, you wrote: PM I don't believe there is. And there shouldn't

Re[2]: Modify received date? (or created date)

2004-03-19 Thread Neil
Thursday, March 18, 2004, 9:08:27 PM, you wrote: JA On Thursday, March 18, 2004, Neil wrote... Sorry I don't understand what you are getting at? The Created date shows as 10 January 2010, 04:41:00 (Mon Feb 11 19:10:43 2002) JA The format is wrong, he is pointing it out. In the email that

Re: Modify received date? (or created date)

2004-03-19 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Friday, March 19, 2004, Neil wrote... Sorry I don't understand what you are getting at? The Created date shows as 10 January 2010, 04:41:00 (Mon Feb 11 19:10:43 2002) JA The format is wrong, he is pointing it out. In the email that was JA sent, it is in the format: Ok thanks I

Re: BayesIt

2004-03-19 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello bats, on Fri, 19. Mar 2004 at 08:57:08 + Stuart Hemming wrote: RO No. If it would do that, it should decide on spam on the headers, RO that's not very likely to be a very precise method. sighI expected that./sigh It was possible with an older version, don't know if that feature is

Re[2]: Modify received date? (or created date)

2004-03-19 Thread Neil
Thursday, March 18, 2004, 9:08:27 PM, you wrote: JA On Thursday, March 18, 2004, Neil wrote... Sorry I don't understand what you are getting at? The Created date shows as 10 January 2010, 04:41:00 (Mon Feb 11 19:10:43 2002) JA The format is wrong, he is pointing it out. In the email that

Re: Modify received date? (or created date)

2004-03-19 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Friday, March 19, 2004, Neil wrote... Which if I import as a Unix mailbox still shows as 2010 but if I double click on the file (01.msg) it opens in TB AND with the correct date. Could it be you have the created date showing in the preview, and not the received date? When you did the

Re: Modify received date? (or created date)

2004-03-19 Thread Chris
Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 19-Mar-2004 2:25:37 PM Modify received date? (or created date) mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Time: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:57:50 GMT Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:57:50 GMT SNIP (by the way this is a received email and my system clock is correct - locked to an internet atomic