Hi Peter,
PM on Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:10:01 +0100GMT, you wrote:
PM I don't believe there is. And there shouldn't be. You'd better train
PM K9 with the spam *you* actually receive. This way you will get K9 to
PM filter to *your* needs.
Well, exactly for that reason I would like to be able to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
RO No. If it would do that, it should decide on spam on the headers,
RO that's not very likely to be a very precise method.
sighI expected that./sigh
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by
This morning I received a message from a friend who began using The
Bat after reading my recommendation of it. Here it is, edited
slightly.
I signed off TBUDL a while ago because The Bat had moved from
being a major part of my thoughts to being a program which just
works.
However I hit a
Hi Hartwig,
on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:15:00 +0100GMT, you wrote:
PM I don't believe there is. And there shouldn't be. You'd better train
PM K9 with the spam *you* actually receive. This way you will get K9 to
PM filter to *your* needs.
HH Well, exactly for that reason I would like to be able
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi cs4l,
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:18:50 +0100 (2:18 AM here), cs4l [c] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
c You could use both machines to read email, and with synchronize,
c you could then transfer the messages which have been read on one
c machine to
I received a message mailed out from Outlook/Exchange, and the
paragraphs appeared fine in TB! I forwarded the message, and the
paragraphs in the TB! composition window were not wrapped.
1. Why?
2. I used Alt-L, but, if I had not done that, would they have
wrapped on mailing or otherwise
On Friday, March 19, 2004, 2:41:03 PM, Kevin Coates wrote:
Ah, I think I understand now. So I needn't worry which machine I
download mail with as long as I synchronize periodically. Thanks for
the explanation.
The other thing to remember to TB! synch is that it is one way each
time, that is,
Hello Bill,
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:34:49 -0500 GMT (19/03/2004, 18:34 +0700 GMT),
Bill Blinn - Technology Editor wrote:
BBTE This morning I received a message from a friend who began using The
BBTE Bat after reading my recommendation of it. Here it is, edited
BBTE slightly.
[...]
It took a
Hello Joseph,
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:54:25 + (UTC) GMT (19/03/2004, 21:54 +0700 GMT),
Joseph N. wrote:
JN I received a message mailed out from Outlook/Exchange, and the
JN paragraphs appeared fine in TB! I forwarded the message, and the
JN paragraphs in the TB! composition window were not
Hi Peter,
thanks a lot for the information. That was the missing link I apparently
kept ignoring.
Cheers Thanks,
Hartwig
Friday, March 19, 2004, 1:14:35 PM, you wrote:
PM Hi Hartwig,
PM on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:15:00 +0100GMT, you wrote:
PM I don't believe there is. And there shouldn't
Thursday, March 18, 2004, 9:08:27 PM, you wrote:
JA On Thursday, March 18, 2004, Neil wrote...
Sorry I don't understand what you are getting at?
The Created date shows as 10 January 2010, 04:41:00 (Mon Feb 11
19:10:43 2002)
JA The format is wrong, he is pointing it out. In the email that
On Friday, March 19, 2004, Neil wrote...
Sorry I don't understand what you are getting at?
The Created date shows as 10 January 2010, 04:41:00 (Mon Feb 11
19:10:43 2002)
JA The format is wrong, he is pointing it out. In the email that was
JA sent, it is in the format:
Ok thanks I
Hello bats,
on Fri, 19. Mar 2004 at 08:57:08 + Stuart Hemming wrote:
RO No. If it would do that, it should decide on spam on the headers,
RO that's not very likely to be a very precise method.
sighI expected that./sigh
It was possible with an older version, don't know if that feature is
Thursday, March 18, 2004, 9:08:27 PM, you wrote:
JA On Thursday, March 18, 2004, Neil wrote...
Sorry I don't understand what you are getting at?
The Created date shows as 10 January 2010, 04:41:00 (Mon Feb 11
19:10:43 2002)
JA The format is wrong, he is pointing it out. In the email that
On Friday, March 19, 2004, Neil wrote...
Which if I import as a Unix mailbox still shows as 2010 but if I
double click on the file (01.msg) it opens in TB AND with the
correct date.
Could it be you have the created date showing in the preview, and not
the received date? When you did the
Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 19-Mar-2004 2:25:37 PM
Modify received date? (or created date) mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Time: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:57:50 GMT
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:57:50 GMT
SNIP
(by the way this is a received email and my system clock is correct -
locked to an internet atomic
16 matches
Mail list logo