Re: K9 AV Plugin

2004-11-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Richard, on Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:40:22 +0500GMT, you wrote: RHS I'm trying out K9 ... However, it causes a problem for my AV RHS plugin (Avast), which heretofore would flag viruses and RHS automatically move them to the quarantine folder. I used K9 before I installed Avast, and thus never

Re: K9 AV Plugin

2004-11-28 Thread Andre Wichartz
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:40:22 +0500, Richard H. Stoddard wrote: Greetings: I'm trying out K9 since BayesIt has dropped from an accuracy rate of 97% to less than 33% over the last few months. However, it causes a problem for my AV plugin (Avast), which heretofore would flag viruses and automatically

Re: K9 AV Plugin

2004-11-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Andre, on Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:45:00 +0100GMT, you wrote: it was a lot cleaner when the plugin just moved them automatically to the quarantine folder. Is there any way to configure either K9, TB!, or Avast to restore that functionality? AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages as

Re: K9 AV Plugin

2004-11-28 Thread Andre Wichartz
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:58:14 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote: I cannot find a setting anywhere to move all infected mails to quarantine (or delete) automatically either. I have only v2 here but this is not plugin specific. I can set the option even without an installed plugin. See

Re: K9 AV Plugin

2004-11-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Andre, on Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:22:18 +0100GMT, you wrote: AW On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:58:14 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote: I cannot find a setting anywhere to move all infected mails to quarantine (or delete) automatically either. AW I have only v2 here but this is not plugin specific. I can set

Re: K9 AV Plugin

2004-11-28 Thread Raymund Thomas Tump
Hi Andre, That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9 shouldn't make a difference at all. Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will store the mail for a time on the hard disk.

Re[2]: K9 AV Plugin

2004-11-28 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Andre, Sunday, November 28, 2004, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote: AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the AW mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9 AW shouldn't make a difference at all. You mean the plugin catches it? And AW what then? Is

Re[2]: K9 AV Plugin

2004-11-28 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Raymund, Monday, November 29, 2004, 1:11:23 AM, you wrote: RTT Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will RTT store the mail for a time on the hard disk. That that is where Avast RTT can fetch it. But that would harm the mail delivery only if K9 sends RTT the mail from

Re[2]: K9 AV Plugin

2004-11-28 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Andre, Sunday, November 28, 2004, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote: AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the AW mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9 AW shouldn't make a difference at all. You mean the plugin catches it? And AW what then? Is

Mod: Cut mark (was: K9 AV Plugin)

2004-11-28 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Richard, On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:50:07 +0500GMT (29-11-2004, 2:50 +0100, where I live), you wrote: RHS caught, but some days I get for or five per session, so prefer they be RHS quarantined by TB! as before. RHS RHS Current version is