Re: SMTP problem

2005-05-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Vili, On Tue, 3 May 2005 02:30:57 +0200GMT (3-5-2005, 2:30 +0200, where I live), you wrote: TBS SMTP server is ok, the recipient email is ok, I get back this message: TBS 500 invalid domain name When you're sure about those two, my guess would be that you're using the wrong from address.

Re[2]: Was I dreaming...?

2005-05-03 Thread Vili
Sometime earlier this year there was an email about a version of TB that would run from a memory stick. U This definitely rang a bell. So I did some searching and found The Bat! U Voyager U http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/news_detail.php?ID=725phrase_id=745609 Unfortunately, you did

Re: SMTP problem

2005-05-03 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Vili, On Tuesday, May 3, 2005 at 2:30:57 AM Vili [V] wrote: V SMTP server is ok, the recipient email is ok, I get back this message: V 500 invalid domain name V What can be the problem? Well, if server is OK and address is OK and server moans about address, either one must be not OK.

TB! and PGPDisk

2005-05-03 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
I’ve been waiting for message-base encryption to be implemented, but have been thinking of an interim solution using PGPDisk. Would it slow down TB! downloads, etc., to move the message folders to an encrypted disk? Obviously the encrypted disk would need to be opened before opening TB!, but can

Re[2]: SMTP problem

2005-05-03 Thread Vili
Hello Roelof, TBS SMTP server is ok, the recipient email is ok, I get back this message: TBS 500 invalid domain name RO When you're sure about those two, my guess would be that you're using RO the wrong from address. ??? What does it exactly mean? This address I am sending from is valid. Is not

Re: SMTP problem

2005-05-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Vili, On Tue, 3 May 2005 14:21:24 +0200GMT (3-5-2005, 14:21 +0200, where I live), you wrote: TBS SMTP server is ok, the recipient email is ok, I get back this message: TBS 500 invalid domain name TBS ??? What does it exactly mean? This address I am sending from is TBS valid. Here are the

Mod: Cut mark (was: SMTP problem)

2005-05-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Vili, On Tue, 3 May 2005 14:21:24 +0200GMT (3-5-2005, 14:21 +0200, where I live), you wrote: TBS Is not it possible, that some error on the SMTP server cause this TBS error message? TBS Vili TBS TBS Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using

Re: TB! and PGPDisk

2005-05-03 Thread Allie Martin
Hi Richard, On 03/05/2005 08:08 AM -0400, you wrote: Ive been waiting for message-base encryption to be implemented, but have been thinking of an interim solution using PGPDisk. Would it slow down TB! downloads, etc., to move the message folders to an encrypted disk? Obviously the encrypted disk

Re[2]: TB! and PGPDisk

2005-05-03 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Allie, Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 6:08:57 PM, you wrote: AM There have been subscribers to this list who used TB! with their mail AM on an encrypted PGP Virtual Disk. They had no operational problems. Thanks. I'll give it a try. -- Current

Re: TB! and PGPDisk

2005-05-03 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 3 May 2005, @ @ at 08:08:17 -0400, when Richard H. Stoddard wrote: I’ve been waiting for message-base encryption to be implemented, but have been thinking of an interim

Re: SMTP problem

2005-05-03 Thread Gerard
ON Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 1:50:18 PM, you wrote: PP Well, if server is OK and address is OK and server moans about PP address, either one must be not OK. Quite obvious, isn't it? There might be a temporary outage. I have seen a few lately. What is also possible is that your e-mail is rejected on

Filtering issue

2005-05-03 Thread MikeD (3)
Hello All, Just as of today I have been hammered by a significant increase in spam. I can deal with that. But one thing did confuse me. One of the spam messages ended up in my known folder and I checked my address book three times to be sure and neither the From nor the To address appear in my

Re: Announcement: The Bat! Nailclipper

2005-05-03 Thread Mark Wieder
admin- Monday, May 2, 2005, 5:15:34 AM, you wrote: aacu Many users experience difficulties activating the hand aacu and configuring an e-nail account. Often my hands are busy typing. I wonder if it would be possible to have an e-nail client for a different OS. My feet, for example, are

Re[2]: TB! and PGPDisk

2005-05-03 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Mica, Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 8:03:22 PM, you wrote: MM Since TB installation also dwells on this disk, it is not possible to MM start even TB, if the PGP disk is not unlocked. Beautiful! I think I'll settle for just moving the message folders, since I should be able to do that without a

Re: Filtering issue

2005-05-03 Thread MAU
Hello MikeD, Using The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 You are using a beta version, you should post this in the TBBeta list. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL'

Re[2]: Filtering issue

2005-05-03 Thread MikeD (3)
Hello MAU, Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 1:41:56 PM, you wrote: M Hello MikeD, Using The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 M You are using a beta version, you should post this in the TBBeta list. Ooops ... sorry. Grabbed the wrong email -- Best regards, MikeDmailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: Announcement: The Bat! Nailclipper

2005-05-03 Thread Marten Gallagher
We used to have a sneakernet at my old office, but I think this was something else. Does Nailclipper rely on the finger protocol to determine configuration? I think with SneakerNet it's Net/Pooey protocol... -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat!

Re: Announcement: The Bat! Nailclipper

2005-05-03 Thread David Elliott
Hello admin, Monday, May 2, 2005, 1:15:34 PM, you wrote: Just announced I see - coming shortly to a finger near you... The Bat! Nailclipper – Mobile Enail Client Sounds Great but what is the URL. VBG -- Best regards, Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TB! and PGPDisk

2005-05-03 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 3 May 2005, @ @ at 22:33:00 +0500, when Richard H. Stoddard wrote: MM Well, all in all, Richard, I could cooly suggest you to give the MM PGPDisk a nice try, it will show quite

Re: Announcement: The Bat! Nailclipper

2005-05-03 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 2 May 2005, @ @ at 13:15:34 +0100, when admin@ wrote: But now you have a fully configured Enail Client with an active e-nail account on one of the free fingers. Good! Now,

Re: TB! and PGPDisk

2005-05-03 Thread Robin Anson
On Tue 3 May 2005, 22:08:17 +1000, Richard H. Stoddard wrote: I’ve been waiting for message-base encryption to be implemented, but have been thinking of an interim solution using PGPDisk. Would it slow down TB! downloads, etc., to move the message folders to an encrypted disk? Obviously the

Re[2]: Announcement: The Bat! Nailclipper

2005-05-03 Thread Marten Gallagher
The Bat! Nailclipper – Mobile Enail Client Sounds Great but what is the URL. Is it? -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 with POPFile 0.22.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 |

SMTP problem solved

2005-05-03 Thread The Bat! support
Hello guys, First, thank you for all of you for your time and for your thorough answers. I did not change anything, the problem went away... As it happened with Gerard sometimes... So Peter (Palmreuther): it is not as obvious as you thought... I am happy, that you also learnt something

Re: SMTP problem solved

2005-05-03 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Vili everyone else, on 04-Mai-2005 at 03:25 you (The Bat! support) wrote: If nothing else, than this: if you don't have anything to say, please be quiet With comments like this, I'd say you have to start with yourself. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ