-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I want to use nicknames (handles) in my default templates for new
messages. I've tried (in account properties) to edit the default
template by replacing %TOFNAME with either %TONICKNAME or %TOHANDLE.
However, in both cases I get a blank space and
Dear Richard,
@10-Nov-2006, 20:06 +0500 (10-Nov 15:06 here) Richard H. Stoddard
[RHS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
RHS I want to use nicknames (handles) in my default templates for new
RHS messages. I've tried (in account properties) to edit the default
RHS template by replacing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Marck,
MDP You want the AB macro set to do this with, since the Handle is an
MDP attribute of the Address book entry rather than a function of the
MDP addressee. %ABtoHandle does the job admirably.
Works like a charm - thanks. But I don't suppose
Dear Richard,
@10-Nov-2006, 20:32 +0500 (10-Nov 15:32 here) Richard H. Stoddard
[RHS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP You want the AB macro set to do this with, since the Handle is an
MDP attribute of the Address book entry rather than a function of the
MDP addressee. %ABtoHandle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Marck,
Friday, November 10, 2006, 8:44:25 PM, you wrote:
MDP It is at this stage I usually bail out and hit one of the lesser
MDP used AB fields - like %ABtoBusPager or something or %ABtoPrefix.
MDP I don't use TB to address real mail so I never
Dear Richard,
@10-Nov-2006, 21:05 +0500 (10-Nov 16:05 here) Richard H. Stoddard
[RHS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP It is at this stage I usually bail out and hit one of the lesser
MDP used AB fields - like %ABtoBusPager or something or %ABtoPrefix.
MDP I don't use TB to address
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 at 20:32:02 +0500, Richard wrote:
MDP You want the AB macro set to do this with, since the Handle is an
MDP attribute of the Address book entry rather than a function of the
MDP addressee. %ABtoHandle does the job admirably.
Works like a charm - thanks. But I don't suppose
Hi
On Friday 10 November 2006 at 4:05:03 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard H. Stoddard
wrote:
Maybe it would just better to use the standard and then use an
addressee template for those whose nicknames aren't the same as
their first names. It may be less work in the end.
Even less work
Maybe it would just better to use the standard and then use an
addressee template for those whose nicknames aren't the same as
their first names. It may be less work in the end.
M Even less work would be to just put the nickname in the first name
M field.
After much stealing of other list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks to all who've replied. One of these will likely work for me.
The main reason I want this to work is that for some people I want a
more formal address but an informal salutation. I'll test these
possibilities after a few more cups of coffee.
Hi
Where macros are described as having identical functionality, is
there any reason to choose one over the other?
eg %PUT or %INCLUDE
%QT or %QINCLUDE
Are they really just straight alternatives, or an older version
deprecated in favour of a newer one?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
11 matches
Mail list logo
