On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 07:05:25 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AdG I don't know about your set-up, but in my situation I would try
AdG this:
Thanks for your idea, but it seems a bit unfeasable:
Yes, I suspected it already. When I used TB on a regular basis, I
filtered incoming mail directly to unix
Hello Arjan,
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:08:39 +0200 GMT (06/Jul/09, 20:08 +0700 GMT),
Arjan de Groot wrote:
Have you tried the messages? Which TB! version are you using, and how
do they display on your side?
AdG I tried them in TB 4.2.6 but unfortunataly my Windows doesn't speak
AdG Thai.
I think
Hi
On Monday 6 July 2009 at 5:40:24 PM, in
mid:298147479.20090706234...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
I think if you'd tried 4.0.28 (which is not possible,
but hey), your Windows would have spoken Thai. Unless
it's a Win98.
I see all three here.
Well, I think I do. I
Hello Roelof,
This is what you said on Sat, 4 Jul 2009 18:09:47 +0200 your time:
The contents of the sent or received messages might give you some idea
of the date of the transaction. The protocol log is intended for
problem hunting, not for keeping permanent stats.
Well, for starters,
Hello MFPA,
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:26:46 +0100 GMT (07/Jul/09, 0:26 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
I think if you'd tried 4.0.28 (which is not possible,
but hey), your Windows would have spoken Thai. Unless
it's a Win98.
M I see all three here.
M Well, I think I do. I don't know what the Thai
Hi
On Monday 6 July 2009 at 7:13:15 PM, in
mid:203765731.20090707011...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
Thank you, it confirms my theory that it was still OK
in 4.0.x.
Bug report: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7654
Just to check, here's screenshots of TB! 4.0.38
Montag, 6. Juli 2009 at 15:08, Arjan de Groot wrote:
When I used TB on a regular basis, I
filtered incoming mail directly to unix files and kept my database
small.
If The Bat! would be able to display UNIX .mbx Files in a Folder, i
would do that too - that would be a Feature, even to read my
Hello MFPA,
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:18:55 +0100 GMT (07/Jul/09, 2:18 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
Thank you, it confirms my theory that it was still OK
in 4.0.x.
Bug report: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7654
M Just to check, here's screenshots of TB! 4.0.38 viewing your emails:-
M
8 matches
Mail list logo
