-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 9:52:21 AM, Curtis wrote:
> to another folder using or Navigation -> Go to Folder.
> OTOH, I'd want PMMail's browse windows to disappear when I'm finished
> browsing a list because there's nothing else to do with the brows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 10:06:42 AM, Curtis wrote:
> LOT. :-) One thing though, it requires practice like a spoken language.
Yes, it does. Just like spoken language it can also get very complex,
esp. when one considers there are different "d
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 06:57:49AM -0700, Ming-Li wrote:
> preserving Alt-Tab for application switching. With SDI, it might
> take forever to switch to another application with Alt-Tab, forcing
> you to use mouse. (Not that I hate mouse, mind you.)
You know, the only time I've ever used alt-t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 6:25:49 AM, Mike wrote:
> (?i)make money fast
> will screen for that string of text on a case-insensitive basis.
> Is that correct?
This is why I wish RIT would release docs on how TB! uses PCRE. For me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 6:05:02 AM, Nick wrote:
> In Reference to "Too many windows" From Steve Lamb:
S>> Mainly because there is a utility out there that groups like
S>> windows together under a single start bar button
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 5:45:48 AM, Oliver wrote:
>grep aol file >> die.scum
Ah, very correct.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 12:17:41 AM, Leif wrote:
> Multiple Document Interface. It's nice (IMHO-- Steve and I already
> covered this ground ) for things like Opera and Frontpage, but
> stinks for e-mail.
BTW, we should go over it again someti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 12:35:08 AM, Jamie wrote:
> Grep.com was supplied free with all versions of Borland C and C++ as well
> as Pascal from version 3 onwards .
I'm not sure it has the same options, however.
- --
Steve C. Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 2:36:32 AM, Syafril wrote:
> Thanks again, I have been trying to learn Regex, but still no go,
> perhaps I have to read from the book.
> Anyone have suggestion the good book for Regular Expression ?
Programming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 10:55:04 PM, Marc wrote:
> Just a quick questions.. what does MDI stand for? (I know what it is,
> being a longtime Eudora User.. but I was curious)
Multi-document interface.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 10:53:37 PM, Curtis wrote:
> We aren't being critical of PMMails method. We are defending TB!'s
> method. There's a difference there you know.
Right.
PMMail correct.
TB! incorrect.
Reasons given months ago.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 10:48:21 PM, Curtis wrote:
> machine as we speak for cripes sake. I know exactly what you're both
> referring to. Just what is your problem Steve??!!
My problem is most people get it wrong. There is no problems with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 9:27:36 PM, Marck wrote:
JA>> What would be your closest analogy for pasting? Is hitting the paste
JA>> button the same as typing whatever you copied? Or is it like going to
JA>> a magazine and physically ripping out the p
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 09:07:41PM -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote:
> Steve's impact on my life is akin to the impact on me of a mosquito
> imbedded in the ass of a chimp in Uganda.
> p> Steve likely surrounds himself with other like-minded intelligent types.
> Yes, I've heard that sheep like to
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 08:27:21PM -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote:
> Yeah, sure, right after you learn how to spell.
Oh, are we down to that level now? Sheesh, what a newbie.
> Most people who play golf well also usually spell well.
Most people who play golf can't spell at all and, inste
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 06:34:27PM -0700, phil wrote:
> Actually Henry Ford was a Genius, even though he only had 3 months(or was
To expand upon that, do you know why Ford said that? Because at that time
cars were painted by hand. For a decent finish they needed the paint to dry
as fast as
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 02:01:51AM +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> On 09 August 2000 at 17:19:41 GMT -0700 (which was 01:19 where I
> live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
> of "Two Format Questions":
> >>Many of my clips are *dozens* of paragraph's long.
>
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 01:36:45AM +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Out of interest, why argue /for/ the persistence of a bug just because
> it doesn't affect you when its' cure won't affect you either? I can't
> imagine why you feel a need to do that.
Uhm, because it isn't a bug?
--
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:49:03AM +0100, Deryk Lister wrote:
> However: the GNU tools are extremely useful and a lot easier to use
> than you think... I think they were ported to Win32 as well, which
> makes Steve's point more valid to those who aren't Linux zealots.
Yes, they have been.
>
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 07:16:33PM -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote:
> MDP> I don't
> MDP> use it myself. Nor do I use the "double space after punctuation"
> MDP> concept. I do use paragraphs separated by a blank line.
> That! It eliminates those blank lines.
Well, now you understand
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 06:47:07PM -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote:
>And who, in their right mind, anyway, would want to do that with
>*each* paragraph when they didn't have to (thanks to ClipMate)???
>Many of my clips are *dozens* of paragraph's long.
*shrug* Most editors
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 06:40:16PM -0500, Joe Finocchiaro wrote:
> For the time being, at least, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and not
> take exception to it.
Well, considering the message I was replying to was intented on every
line, take exception.
> Maybe not from where you sit,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:38:52AM +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> get back to where you were and maybe remember exactly what you were
> going to say and to whom you wanted to say it ...
> No, I'm glad TB does it the way it does it. Sure it's different. Vive
> la difference IMHO ;-).
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:17:22AM +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> What do you mean by "maintain paragraphs"? If you mean the typewriter
> convention of indenting the first line of a new paragraph .. I don't
> use it myself. Nor do I use the "double space after punctuation"
> concept.
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 06:07:47PM -0500, Curtis wrote:
> browse different folders from the same window. When I'm finished looking
> through messages, I may wish to select a new folder to browse. If the
> window disappears when I'm finished with a list this would pose a
> problem if I wish to brow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 2:55:39 PM, Kenneth wrote:
> I'm just starting to play with TB after coming from PMMail, and one
> thing that's hard to get used to is the action of the Next/Prev
> buttons when at the end of a folder.
You and me both.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 3:19:32 PM, Curtis wrote:
KP>> automatically close the window when the end of the list is reached?
> Nope. This is just a difference in behaviour. Different clients.
For which TB! is wrong for the reasons outlined befor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 3:10:57 PM, Joe wrote:
> I want my pastes to conform *precisely* with my usual written text format
> (by default), and I still think the majority would agree with that.
Given that your usual written text format blows, pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 3:15:46 PM, Steve wrote:
> find \>\S*
Fat fingered this, it should be \>\s*. >\s* should work also. \S means
non-whitespace where \s means whitespace. Bg difference.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 2:51:38 PM, Leif wrote:
> Try using ALT-L/C/R on this puppy!
Sure.
1. Only in America..can a pizza get to your house faster than an
ambulance.
2. Only in America..are there handicap parking places in front of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 2:47:52 PM, Joe wrote:
> Then, if you asked us again whether we would ever want TB to do this for
> us automatically, and without the need for an external editor, the reply
> would be "You betcha!
Not on your life.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, August 02, 2000, 12:32:56 PM, Jamie wrote:
SL>> The GNU text utils would work wonders here.
SL>> type file | sort | uniq > file.new
SL>> Sort will put them all in order and then uniq will return only a single
SL>> occurance of any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 8:20:58 AM, Deryk wrote:
> I don't think Microsoft invented S/MIME (which would explain
> everything as well) but they were certainly behind it a lot.
Certainly reason right there to ignore it. WTF was RIT thinking when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 7:43:44 AM, David wrote:
> would not only need to download that persons key to check their
> signature, but you would also need to phone them or something, to
> check if the key really belongs to them. How many people here wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 7:43:48 AM, David wrote:
> Anyone could forge a PGP key, if you manage to give fake details to
> Thawte it says they can sue you for about 10,000 dollars or something
> crazy.
No, noone can force a PGP key. If you think
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 08:45:12AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OTH, PGP 6.5.1.i is a 8.1mb download (i just did) and needs 15mb of hard
> disk space ...
> a S/MIME certificate is a couple of 100 bytes and just imports into the
> address book. just sayin' ... it all depends on wether you got
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 01:17:26AM +0100, Deryk Lister wrote:
> Not really. S/MIME insists on including the entire certificate,
> whilst the PGP version (key) has the nice friendly
> download-it-manually method :)
You're joking, right? That has GOT to be a joke. Who the hell would make
a b
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 12:59:04AM +0100, Deryk Lister wrote:
> Of course, it works perfectly in TBUDL and TBBETA since we all use TB
> :)
We do?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboa
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 03:46:34PM -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
> So are you saying that PMMail's PGP plug-in (or whatever method they
> use) presents you with a drop down list of Keys to encrypt your replies
> to so that you can read those replies later on?
No, it encodes to the Key ID assign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 3:08:44 PM, Curtis wrote:
> I much prefer how S/MIME signing is implemented in TB! compared to
> PGP.
Which is how PMMail2k Pro does it. A small indication on the status line
is all you ever see unless you reques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 3:16:02 PM, Nick wrote:
> But isn't that a product of PGP... requiring a default key... and not
> that of the Mail Client. I know of no way around that. How does PMMail
> allow you to choose which of your keys you want your re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 2:55:13 PM, Nick wrote:
> The automatic encryption to both receiver and sender is already
> available through PGPKeys/Edit/Options/General... Always encrypt to
> default key.
I send mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED], I do not w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 1:59:52 PM, Nick wrote:
> What were some of the features inherent in the way PMMail2000Pro
> implemented PGP, that are missing in TB!'s implementation?
Automatic signature checking, the PGP information hidden (viewing a P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 1:22:24 PM, Nick wrote:
> On August 7, 2000, at 10:27:38 AM, Mark Aston Wrote:
>> Actually it's the S/MIME that makes the message 6K or thereabouts, the
>> PGP doesn't make much difference.
>>
>> Whilst it was a new feature a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 9:34:20 AM, Curtis wrote:
> I personally understand your sentence above rather than the cryptic
> snippet of code you posted. If it had been wrapped inappropriately, I
> wouldn't have even realised.
Point was that it woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 8:30:27 AM, Jamie wrote:
> Perl or Python? Definitely showing off.
Perl, and not showing off, just happens to be the first snippet of code I
could find over 80 characters wide to illustrate a point more effectively than
s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday, August 07, 2000, 2:09:26 AM, Martyn wrote:
> - Get rid of the horizontal scroll bar - text should be fully
> wrapped within the open message window upon reading that message
sub make_date {
@time = gmtime(time);
my(@month) =
("Ja
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday, August 05, 2000, 3:37:03 AM, Remi wrote:
> I have noticed that every time I create or open a message, TheBat!
> opens a new window. I find this confusing and unnecessary. Is there a
> way to do all one's work in the main window, as is the ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, August 04, 2000, 2:48:26 PM, Joe wrote:
> How would anyone know what "Pop-up menu" they were referring to?
Same as with most programs, trial and error. So far the only docs that I
swear by are not online.
O' Holy Programming Perl, p
Friday, August 04, 2000, 1:54:44 PM, Joe wrote:
> PS: Yes, I checked through all the written documentation, but I
> couldn't find anything that documented what the arrow was for.
Funny, this is in the help, "The new entry may be added to the Pop-up menu
of address entry fields, if the check b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, August 04, 2000, 12:43:54 AM, Gold wrote:
> mail from a command-line mailer with a subject 32,748 bytes long, and
> TB receives and displays it just fine. Well, pretty much. For some
> reason, the string "Length=97" was appended to the end of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, August 03, 2000, 12:59:55 PM, Nick wrote:
> It's an election year (here in the U.S.). Better get out there and
> start canvassing votes, Steve. Looks like there's competition on the
> horizon.
Hey now, I said I was an @hole, not a poli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, August 03, 2000, 12:16:01 PM, Dierk wrote:
> Reading your posts again, consider me an ale and do not - I
> repeat *not* - answer to this one.
Hey now, I'm the resident TBUDL/TBBETA @hole.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 12:14:55AM +0800, icqman wrote:
> do you by any chance know of any txt editor which can remove identical lines?
> i have got a list of addresses which i joined from 5 other txts and it
> came to some 5000 k and about 4 identical lines of each
The GNU text utils would
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 02:59:52PM +0900, Leif Gregory wrote:
> There are quite a few people on this list who pay for Internet access
> by the amount of data transferred.
I'll have the spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans and spam..
But could you substitute spam for the baked beans
Friday, July 28, 2000, 9:25:06 AM, Marck wrote:
> No problem - it was just the second time you had said so.
However I think that it wasn't the only point made in that post. And,
humorously enough, I think the thread wound down before you called a DH. ;)
--
Steve C. Lamb
Friday, July 28, 2000, 8:26:50 AM, Thomas wrote:
> My smtp server is ms10.hinet.net or something around that - I keep
> chainging - (never mind the "from" address), but if you say they're
> not RFC compliant, I will take it up with them [Thomas arming up].
220 ms10.hinet.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.8.8/
Friday, July 28, 2000, 1:51:07 AM, Marck wrote:
TF>> I see your point. How about tabs at the bottom then? This way you know
TF>> there are attacheements, and I really don't need big icons. I have now
TF>> icons on the left side, plus tabs for some of the attachments.
> IMHO we're starting to get
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 8:59:12 PM, Thomas wrote:
> With our recent discussion about default domains, I would like to
> suggest that TB does check at least whether a recipient is a valid
> email address.
For the record, Alex's email address, *is* valid per RFC822. The comma is
contained ins
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 04:53:58PM +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> That would be OK for me too. When I see the extension .xls, I don't
> really need the icon. I'm not sure we're the majority though.
Well, the icon I was thinking of was tiny, just like the icons in the list
view for the messa
cept at the bottom?
List view, details. This allows a small icon, a name, a type, and
information about the type if it can be dealt with. For example:
[] Signature/PGP PGP Valid signature from Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[] Image/GIF GIF 23k 800x600
> Not to mention
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:34:09AM +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Fundamental difference between you and me. In office email, I *need*
> to look at the TO and CC fields. shft-crtl-K is cumbersome.
In office email I've yet to get a list larger than what I can see in the
window. Any larger a
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 11:07:44PM -0500, Curtis wrote:
> SL> Nuh-huh!!! Try this on for the standard text editor[*]. 80i
> SL> yy80PG$
> Uhm, that one passed me by. Did I miss the obvious above? :-0
80 - repeat next command 80 times
i - enter insert mode
- insert a space
- exit
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:32:39PM -0500, Curtis wrote:
> a standard editor. In a standard editor, in order to get the cursor to
> the bottom right corner, one would have to hit the return key until the
> last line is reached and then space bar over to that point.
Nuh-huh!!! Try this on for
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 4:59:49 PM, Joe wrote:
> Well, at least I'm as stupid as the vast majority of TB newbies, eh?
Nah, I'd say smarter. I think the quirky interface of TB! turns off most
newbies. I will admit that I looked at TB! for, o, a year, off and on,
before relenting and it
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 4:29:31 PM, Joe wrote:
> Just a quick question. Is it possible to have *multiple* line
> quotes/phrases for Cookies?
> I don't know that many one-liners.
And coming in at #2 is "One More Line" by Britenay Speers!
Yup, \n where you want the line break(s).
--
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 3:54:30 PM, Tom wrote:
NA>> Secondly, this may be OT for the List, but I've never reformatted
NA>> before, and I do have a start-up disk that has all the necessary files
NA>> and CD-ROM drivers, etc. What I'm not sure of, is the exact command to
NA>> type in a DOS prompt
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 2:26:37 PM, Joe wrote:
> Really, Nick? That's freaking amazing, I say.
> It's a good thing that I drink...
> Thanks for the quick reply. I was ready to open a new bottle.
He's joking with you. We have a web cam hooked up and saw you drinking
and decided to have a
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 1:56:42 PM, Tom wrote:
> You don't look at any of the headers in any form before reading a
> message?
Look, no. Scan, yes.
> Am I correct in assuming that you don't ever care what the full To:
> field is, if it's long?
Oddly enough that rarely happens. The few
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 10:33:54 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Both accounts would be similar, with the only exception being the smtp
> server in acounts/properties/transport.
Won't work. When I accidentally write a message in my work account that I
meant to send from my home account I, at one time,
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 10:11:15 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Let's swing away from technology-centered UI to user-centered UI. You
> are technically right, but the user would appreciate it if the
> attachment icon was in the body on a GUI.
The user would, would s/he? I don't think so. As I said, b
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 4:26:53 PM, Tony wrote:
> I think the area people are referring to is the blank area above the
> preview text. There is plenty of wasted space there as can bee seen
> from the example.
Wasted only if the fields are short. Quite frankly they need to drop the
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 4:08:50 PM, Curtis wrote:
> prefer to use in a particular situation. I prefer a standard shift car.
> Others think I'm backward and like unnecessary tedium. That's
> them.
Of course, how else are you supposed to drop 3 gears to get a high boost
so you can switch lan
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 02:36:58AM -0700, Tom Plunket wrote:
> Isn't it funny that Agent solved this years ago in what I would call
> the near-perfect solution?
Because it isn't nearly perfect nor a solution?
> top of the message. However, if you're only interested in To:, From:,
> CC:, and
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 3:46:55 PM, Nick wrote:
> This was my exact point in an earlier thread about displaying the icons
> representing an S/MIME signature. My suggestion was to follow Outlook
> and Eudora's example... re-designing the icon to something much smaller,
> and to relocate it to the
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 1:52:22 PM, Curtis wrote:
> do it faster that way. Why? Because I'm deadly accurate and fast with a
> mouse. Sorry that you aren't. :-)
You're assumption is that I am not. As I stated, I play FPS games and I
use the mouse. I was in one of the top CS clans of its ti
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 1:48:29 PM, Fred wrote:
> Of course I can use the keyboard (with the Bat I'm forced to do that).
> But I noticed with other programs that I find it much easier and faster
> to drag and drop text blocks with my intellimouse (digital or
> analog???).
Analog. Intellimo
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 1:44:48 PM, Tom wrote:
> Heh, well, if your mouse is a little pencil-head eraser-type thing in
> between the G, B, and H keys, then presumably it's not too far away.
> :)
Ungh. While that is the best laptop pointing device there is it is even
more imprecise than a m
...is there any way to have attachments show up at the bottom of the edit
and folder view windows instead of the side? The side is absolutely the
stupidest place to put it because causes the width of the view window to
change. This is a problem in that my edit and view windows are wide enoug
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 1:42:36 PM, Curtis wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:12:06 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> traditional way is better then say so. Adding this silly 'but this is
> how it has been done for god knows how many years' just doesn't cut it.
That is why I
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 1:08:33 PM, Fred wrote:
FvV>>> Is it possible to drag and drop text in the editor?
C>> No it's not. . Missing Agent again? :-)
> Too bad. Maybe in a next version. In agent is a option you can chose
> or not! Yep missing agent again!
I never understood t
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 9:55:38 AM, Tony wrote:
> Has anyone else experienced this?
Yup, tried to email the postmaster to tell him to get a real MTA and this
is what I got:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered t
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 9:12:23 AM, Ben wrote:
> Thanks for your patience...
If it is any consolation I rather liked the way OS/2 had their interface
set up with the mouse. It made better use of the two mouse buttons standard
on the PC.
BTW, just to forewarn you of a gotcha in TB! it
Wednesday, July 26, 2000, 7:49:13 AM, Ben wrote:
> I can do what I was talking about in Eudora, or many other
> Windows based programs... Just surprised i couldn't do so in TB. :-)))
I'd be surprised if you could use it in but a few (like 1-2) Windows
programs since it is not part of the CUA
Tuesday, July 25, 2000, 6:46:26 PM, Ben wrote:
> I suppose I didn't make myself too clear. What I would like to do is to
> click and hold the left mouse button while I drag the cursor down the list
> of messages, and then release it , and had have all of the messages the
> cursor passed over highl
Tuesday, July 25, 2000, 5:45:00 AM, Ben wrote:
> Is there a way to drag and select with the mouse? For example, you want to
> delete ten messages. I know I can do with the keyboard, but like to do it
> with my Tablet (mouse).
No, this isn't OS/2.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm yo
Monday, July 24, 2000, 11:40:58 PM, Thomas wrote:
MW>> A stupid question,
> No such thing.
If a chicken and a half lays an egg and a half in a day and a half how
long does it take a man with one wooden leg to kick all the seeds out of a
dill pickle?
I love it when people say that. :)
Monday, July 24, 2000, 4:30:04 PM, Ming-Li wrote:
> As a new user of S/MIME myself, a comprehensive answer is beyond me.
> Perhaps some security gurus could shed some light.
It is like WinCE, just not as aptly named.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm
Monday, July 24, 2000, 1:47:58 PM, John wrote:
> How do I get the columns to display the date as well as the time for all
> messages?
Ya don't. Anything displaying the time was received today, anything date
on that date.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink,
Monday, July 24, 2000, 10:30:23 AM, Nick wrote:
> On my install, those combinations result in exactly the same thing... a
> fully quoted reply addressed solely to the Sender, and the List address
> is never included.
Odd, I wonder what option you have (un)set that I do not because, as you
can
Monday, July 24, 2000, 3:22:35 AM, Tony wrote:
> The thing I hated most about Eudora, and this was the deciding
> factor to dump it within a few minutes of installing it was:
> Click on the Inbox, a window opens up.
> Click on the outbox, a window opens up.
> Etc. Etc...
Actually,
Monday, July 24, 2000, 12:09:51 AM, Nick wrote:
> My apologies to the entire List for sending the darn attachment... I hit
> "Reply" and should have hit "Reply to All". :o(
You mean Reply-To-Sender (CNTL-F4) not Reply-To-All (SHIFT-CNTL-F5),
right?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm y
Sunday, July 23, 2000, 10:24:59 PM, phil wrote:
> There's always a way to do anything with logic.
Justify Windows?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
--
Sunday, July 23, 2000, 12:12:19 AM, Leif wrote:
> We will hunt you down like the dog that you are!
Please, don't insult the dogs.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---
Saturday, July 22, 2000, 8:46:23 AM, Jamie wrote:
BP>>> Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs?
MDP>> ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities,
MDP>> then yes.
> Such as www.ultraedit.com Sorry for advertising a commercial product
> b
Friday, July 14, 2000, 8:55:50 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
> TB is treating the whole filter string area as a field, and use
> arrow keys to move within it. After realizing it, I've come to like
> it better. Tabbing/Shift-Tabbing is a sequential movement; you can
> only move back and forth. The filter stri
Friday, July 14, 2000, 5:46:18 AM, Thomas wrote:
> beta 5
What happened to 4, 3, and 2? :P
> Beta 1
> [+] Empty subject reminder
Oh hell. Wanna know something funny? Ritlabs did the same thing a lot of
people do in this regard. They created a dialog and there is a checkbox there
t
Thursday, July 13, 2000, 1:55:02 PM, Marck wrote:
SL>>Well, if labels are colors and he knows of colors, why the
SL>> question. I'm puzzled.
> He didn't know of the parallel - and now (between us) we've filled in
> the gaps. Labels are colours :-).
I just hope we're not doing something
Friday, July 14, 2000, 2:16:42 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
> Agreed. To be fair, though, its current arrangement isn't illogical
> per se. Yet the school of using Tab to move around fields and Arrows
> to move within a drop-down list has won out in today's Windows
> programming.
Bite your tongue! I w
Thursday, July 13, 2000, 12:59:58 PM, Hans wrote:
> I was looking for someting like 'Get mail'
> but it stops after fetching mail headers and presents
> you a tabel view of all the headers (from, to, subject, size)
> after wich you can select the mails your interested in (or all)
> and restrieves
101 - 200 of 973 matches
Mail list logo
