Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread flash
, TB! recognize these stuffs too. Yes! This is my KISS campaign ha..ha.. -flash Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-02 Thread flash
suggest to unsub this kind of user from TB* lists. One should use this kind of account for his job related correspondences only. -flash Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: List problems?

2002-01-19 Thread flash
, Flash -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com

Re: header

2001-09-06 Thread flash
different from mailbox originator. If the value of those to headers are identical, then Sender: header SHOULD NOT appear on the message. Ref.: RFC2822 Regards, Flash -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto

Re: header

2001-09-06 Thread flash
be a bad idea if it's programmable. MUA/MTA should provide that header automagically. Regards, Flash -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe

Re: header

2001-09-06 Thread flash
. No, because it would create any possibilities for someone to create a mess. Regards, Flash -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Threads

2001-09-04 Thread flash
accepts, and restrictive in what one sends. Regards, Flash -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d

Re: failure notice ??

2001-09-01 Thread flash
-to header only once, then if it get the same message (which has same delivered-to header), it would love to think that it is a loop problem. For some reasons, Marck's server (MDaemon) do some header rewriting, (i.e rewrite return-path header) which cause this problem. -flash

Re: failure notice ??

2001-09-01 Thread flash
better then you :-) Regards, -flash -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: failure notice ??

2001-09-01 Thread flash
remember, we have met this kind of problem, right? :-) Regards, -flash -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: failure notice ??

2001-09-01 Thread flash
come to mine while talking about 'this' problem. I think, it's all about old version of MDaemon. Regards, Flash -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED