Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hi On Friday 18 February 2005 at 8:02:16 PM, in , Alexander S. Kunz wrote: >> Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. I think you would have to inline sign, not PGP/MIME for the sig delimiter to be affected. > Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hi On Friday 18 February 2005 at 8:54:23 PM, in , David Calvarese wrote: > My only real issue with buying it is that I need to use it on 2 > PCs. my work PC (for personal email) and my home PC (for the > same). But I'm only ever going to be signing on one at a time. As fa

(no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:54:32 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote: >> Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to >> buying it if I had to. ASK> Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not: ASK> http://www.pgp.com/d

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hello David Calvarese & everyone else, on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote: > Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to > buying it if I had to. Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not: http://www.pgp.com/downloads/freeware/index.html -- Best reg

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hi David Calvarese, On 18/02/2005 03:11 PM, you wrote: > I suppose I'll have to up and buy it then. I was hoping to avoid > having to do that.Ummm... What exactly does it do different > anyway? TB! can generate PGP/MIME signatures using GnuPG. You don't need to get PGP v8 for that. Additio

(no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:02:16 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: >> Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. ASK> Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing, ASK> and the sig delimiter is also totall

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hello Peter Meyns & everyone else, on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: > Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing, and the sig delimiter is also totally normal. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (

Re: (no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

Hi David, on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:31:58 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC>>> I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC>>> up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --. Any DC>>> way to fix that? PM>> Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by

(no subject) Re: TB & GnuPG

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:14:40 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote: PM> Hi David, PM> on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC>> I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC>> up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --. Any DC>> way to fix that? PM