Allie,
On 22-02-2003 01:06, you [A] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
A Peter Fjelsten [PF] wrote:'
PF Actually, I only get false negatives with Bayesian and no false
PF positives with blacklists.
A No false positives with BlackLists? Wow! :)
Nevertheless the
Hello Peter,
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 11:10:18 +0100 GMT (22/02/03, 17:10 +0700 GMT),
Peter Fjelsten wrote:
In my view, SpamCop is too hard. Actually, banning Korean and Chinese
IPs get me a long way (I don't know anyone there).
What if a TBUDL member from these countries sends a posting? I used
Thomas,
On 22-02-2003 13:43, you [T] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
T What if a TBUDL member from these countries sends a posting? I used
T to live in Taiwan, and one TBUDL member never received my postings,
T because he deleted all incoming mails with the .tw TLD. ;-)
If it goes through the
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 10:16 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, February 21, 2003
5:37:31 PM
RE: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI
Greetings Frank,
On Friday, February 21, 2003, 2:04:02 PM, you wrote:
FN Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
FN as spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dg Raftery Sr. [DRS] wrote:'
DRS Obviously you are having a problem with Spampal and I highly
DRS suggest that you correct it!
It would seem that he created a TB! filter to send an auto-reply to
for all messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Frank Nijkamp [FN] wrote:'
FN Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
FN as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
FN altering the subject.
A lot of messages from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Allie Martin [AM] wrote:'
AM A lot of messages from you starting with the quoted text above is
AM reaching TBUDL. Because of this, I've had to change your
AM subscription to 'moderated'. I haven't unsubscribed you. I've just
Allie,
On 21-02-2003 23:52, you [A] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A It would seem that he created a TB! filter to send an auto-reply
A to for all messages containing the 'X-Spampal: Spam' header.
A Not a good idea at all since there are a lot of false positives
A when using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter Fjelsten [PF] wrote:'
PF Actually, I only get false negatives with Bayesian and no false
PF positives with blacklists.
No false positives with BlackLists? Wow! :)
PF What is the basis of your statement?
When
10 matches
Mail list logo
