Hello Nick,
> When you highlight text and do a "Reply Quoting Selected Text"
> shouldn't that override any other default type response?
>
> In particular I'm referring to selecting text below the sig cutoff
> marks "-- ". If I select this text then I am making a conscious effort
> and decision to
Was Fri, 7 May 2004, at 14:34:19 -0500,
when Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> This:
>> --
>> Is seen as a sig delimiter.
> Not here it isn't... do you have the PGP stripper macro by any chance
> are you? I cannot remember the real name of the macro, but it is
> us
Hello Marten,
Friday, May 7, 2004, 5:25:05 PM, you wrote:
M> So: if the highlighted area has any part of itself above the cut mark
M> the sig is cut off
M> If the highlighted area does not include all three cut characters
M> (dash dash space) and has no part of itself above the cut mark: sig is
> Dear Thomas,
> Friday, May 7, 2004, 2:12:30 PM, you responded to Ken:
> I tried this as well and the text below the sig delimiter did _not_ appear
> in the new message pane.
Highlight anything above cut mark excluding the cut mark: sig cut off
Highlight anything above cut mark including the c
Dear Thomas,
Friday, May 7, 2004, 2:12:30 PM, you responded to Ken:
T> I just highlighted this part below your sig delimiter and hit F4. No
T> problem.
I tried this as well and the text below the sig delimiter did _not_ appear
in the new message pane.
--
Regards,
Maggie
Hello Gerard,
Friday, May 7, 2004, 12:54:23 PM, you wrote:
Gerard> Hi Nick,
Gerard> It is more a case of interpreting a line as a signature delimiter.
Gerard> This:
Gerard> --
Gerard> Is seen as a sig delimiter.
Not here.
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
On Friday, May 07, 2004, Gerard wrote...
> It is more a case of interpreting a line as a signature delimiter.
> This:
> --
> Is seen as a sig delimiter.
Not here it isn't... do you have the PGP stripper macro by any chance
are you? I cannot remember the real name of the macro
ON Friday, May 7, 2004, 8:24:55 PM, you wrote:
ND> Yeah, it's only if you quote above and below the delimiter that it
ND> kicks in and overrides you.
Hi Nick,
It is more a case of interpreting a line as a signature delimiter.
This:
--
Is seen as a sig delimiter.
--
Best reg
Reply to message sent 5/7/2004, @ 01:12:30 (1:12 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Thomas,
> I just highlighted this part below your sig delimiter and hit F4. No
> problem.
Yeah, it's only if you quote above and below the delimiter that it
kicks in
Hello ken,
On Fri, 07 May 2004 13:01:01 -0500 GMT (08/05/2004, 01:01 +0700 GMT),
ken green wrote:
kg> ken green
kg> definitely Mary Ann
I just highlighted this part below your sig delimiter and hit F4. No
problem.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
"Wenn
Nick Danger wrote:
When you highlight text and do a "Reply Quoting Selected Text"
shouldn't that override any other default type response?
In particular I'm referring to selecting text below the sig cutoff
marks "-- ". If I select this text then I am making a conscious effort
and decision to inclu
ON Friday, May 7, 2004, 3:23:36 PM, you wrote:
ND> Thoughts? Opinions? Agree or disagree? Ginger or Mary Ann?
Hi Nick,
I agree fully.
Me work around is copy and "alt-ins" paste
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
“They are all res
When you highlight text and do a "Reply Quoting Selected Text"
shouldn't that override any other default type response?
In particular I'm referring to selecting text below the sig cutoff
marks "-- ". If I select this text then I am making a conscious effort
and decision to include this in my reply
13 matches
Mail list logo
