Re: [thebat] Re: Background colors

2004-06-25 Thread Lou Yovin
Friday, June 25, 2004, 10:27:30 AM, you wrote: MR> BTW, this message should be in utf-8, so you can check my assumption on MR> it.. Yes, and thanks for the pointer... it is now doing it my way. I did not realize that it used the HTML editor settings for utf-8 even when you tell it to use plain t

Re: Background colors

2004-06-25 Thread Maxim Ryazanov
On Thursday, 24 Jun 2004 15:29 [-0400] Lou Yovin wrote: .. LY> Except for some email that has headers that force black on white. LY> They always seem to contain something like: LY> LY> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 LY> or LY> Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 LY> LY> Is there some

Re: [thebat] Re: Background colors

2004-06-24 Thread Lou Yovin
Thursday, June 24, 2004, 1:39:29 PM, you wrote: MW> Have you checked Options | Preferences... | Plain Text/MicroEd or MW> HTML/Windows Editor? You can change default text/background there. Of MW> course, this won't work with some HTML messages since the colours are MW> set by the markup. Thanks,

Re: Background colors

2004-06-24 Thread Martin Webster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Lou, On 24 June 2004, 08:42 -0400 (13:42 local time) Lou Yovin [LY] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LY> I am one of those who do not like html, so I just tell the viewer to do text. LY> Other than the spammers who tell me I should get a better

Background colors

2004-06-24 Thread Lou Yovin
I am one of those who do not like html, so I just tell the viewer to do text. Other than the spammers who tell me I should get a better reader, I get along pretty well. Except for some email that has headers that force black on white. They always seem to contain something like: Content-Type: text/