Re: OpenPGP - bad signature in message viewer but good signature in source viewer

2010-06-29 Thread MFPA
Hi On Monday 28 June 2010 at 9:41:26 PM, in , Jernej Simoncic wrote: > On Monday, June 28, 2010, 22:16:22, MFPA wrote: >> What character set does the source viewer use? > None (though it uses either CP-1252 or the Windows ANSI > codepage for characters 128..255). Then how does it know wha

Re: OpenPGP - bad signature in message viewer but good signature in source viewer

2010-06-28 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Monday, June 28, 2010, 22:16:22, MFPA wrote: > What character set does the source viewer use? None (though it uses either CP-1252 or the Windows ANSI codepage for characters 128..255). -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > You no sooner get your head above water than

Re: OpenPGP - bad signature in message viewer but good signature in source viewer

2010-06-28 Thread MFPA
Hi On Monday 28 June 2010 at 1:18:48 PM, in , MFPA wrote: > I've encountered some pgp-signed messages that show up > as "bad signature" when I press the button in TB! to > verify them, and also show a "bad signature" if I use > GPGshell's current wind

OpenPGP - bad signature in message viewer but good signature in source viewer

2010-06-28 Thread MFPA
Hi I've encountered some pgp-signed messages that show up as "bad signature" when I press the button in TB! to verify them, and also show a "bad signature" if I use GPGshell's current window decrypt/verify/import function in the message viewer window. Strangely, ex

Re: Bad Signature?

2004-06-01 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello Marck, On 1 Jun 2004 at 10:06:24 +0100 GMT [11:06 CEST] you wrote: MDP> Incorrect. The cut mark is a standard PGP-modified cut mark and MDP> works fine with the newest release (which has been changed to MDP> correctly recognise a PGP-modified cut mark). You don't need the newest release. I

Re: Bad Signature?

2004-06-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Robin, @1-Jun-2004, 12:38 +1000 (01-Jun 03:38 UK time) Robin Anson [RA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Michael: >> I tried to sign an email to myself. When verifying it with the bat >> and PGP 8.03, I am told that it is a bad signature. Ideas? RA> The signatures on both

Re: Bad Signature?

2004-05-31 Thread Robin Anson
On Tue 1 June 2004, 12:25:36 +1000, Michael L. Wilson wrote: > I tried to sign an email to myself. When verifying it with the bat > and PGP 8.03, I am told that it is a bad signature. Ideas? The signatures on both emails you have recently sent to the list verified fine here. However yo

Bad Signature?

2004-05-31 Thread Michael L. Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings All, I tried to sign an email to myself. When verifying it with the bat and PGP 8.03, I am told that it is a bad signature. Ideas? - -- Rev. Michael L. Wilson, MBA @142 Philospher Teacher Critic "Big Brother is watching" - Geo