On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:15:29 +1000, Ian A. White wrote:
Stranger still. This message was picked up as spam, but your other
reply was not.
Now one thing common to both messages is the word SpamPal in
unquoted text so I am wondering if when this message gets to the
list it is gets flagged as
Hi
I've re0installed BayesIt 503 and it is immediately sending all TBUDL
mail to the Junk folder.
Is someone laughing somewhere there at the back.
Help - I am now spending the afternoon retrieving weanted mail from
the Junk folder - until TB 2.10.1 and BIT 5 everything went
swimmingly, Junk
Hi
I've re0installed BayesIt 503 and it is immediately sending all TBUDL
mail to the Junk folder.
Is someone laughing somewhere there at the back.
Help - I am now spending the afternoon retrieving weanted mail from
the Junk folder - until TB 2.10.1 and BIT 5 everything went
swimmingly, Junk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MG Help - I am now spending the afternoon retrieving weanted mail from
MG the Junk folder - until TB 2.10.1 and BIT 5 everything went
MG swimmingly, Junk was never wrong. Now it's worse than useless.
Did you try Michael Rudnick's suggestion ...
On Tuesday, April 20, 2004 at 2:04:11 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MG Help - I am now spending the afternoon retrieving weanted mail from
MG the Junk folder - until TB 2.10.1 and BIT 5 everything went
MG swimmingly, Junk was never wrong. Now it's worse than
Tuesday, April 20, 2004, 6:04:11 PM, you wrote:
SH Did you try Michael Rudnick's suggestion ...
SH ,- [ ]
SH | I have now trained the plug-in and it (for now) seems to be
SH | cooperating better. Here's what I did: - Went to each folder (Received
SH | messages( and marked all the messages
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:53:31 +0100, Marten Gallagher wrote:
I've re0installed BayesIt 503 and it is immediately sending
all TBUDL mail to the Junk folder.
Is someone laughing somewhere there at the back.
Just 1 simple advice: give SpamPal a try.
http://www.spampal.org
Arjan
--
[Non-text
Hi Arjan,
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, at 01:35:26 [GMT+0200] (which was 9:35:26 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
Just 1 simple advice: give SpamPal a try.
http://www.spampal.org
and don't forget to turn of Bayesit at the same time.
After some training SpamPal catches about 99.99% of all my
Hi Ian,
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, at 10:46:59 [GMT+1000] (which was 10:46:59 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
This has happened to another message on this list as well.
The Spam Assassin details are
X-PacNet-AU-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=5.092,
required 4, AWL
Hi Ian,
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, at 10:53:49 [GMT+1000] (which was 10:53:49 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
This is now even stranger. I quoted the text of the message that was
flagged as spam, so I would have expected this message to be flagged
as spam as well. After all it had the the
10 matches
Mail list logo
